First see Farra-the-Con claim Jesus is not the Christ. And Farra-the-Con claims he himself is the Messiah.

Then watch Farra-the-Con claim Obama is “Messiah”.

Interesting how he cites the start of the New Testament, but leaves some words out.

And scripture says:

Farrakhan is an antichrist and his statements about Obama make Obama a false christ, to those who believe what Farra-the-Con said.

I will also add, that Farra-the-Con adjust his statements about Jesus depending on his audience. But the bottom line is, that Louis Farrakhan is an apostate. He’s only made a Presidential candidate part of his apostasy, given the candidate fits Farrakhan’s favored skin tone.

As the saying goes, the devil is a liar, Jesus is the Messiah. Not only is Jesus the Messiah, JESUS IS THE ONLY MESSIAH! Because Jesus is the ONLY HOPE for any person.

The true Messiah warned.

And as He said, the false christs show themselves and we see some of them even deem other men Messiah with themselves.

Related posts:

• The Nation of Islam. A Cult of a Cult.
• Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam’s duping of Blacks

(Efforts to promote the cult of Muhammad or its race cult child the Nation of Islam/NOI are not allowed in comments here, 2 John 1:10-11)

A while back I made a post titled The Prosperity and Word of Faith Movement are a Literal Joke!. Because as I mentioned in that post, the words Paul was inspired to recall regarding some hypocritical Jewish teachers are most fitting regarding what the Word of Faith and Prosperity false teachers have done.

In Christian terms, because of them, the name of the Lord is blasphemed among the unbelievers.

I want to show, that even BEFORE many of us went and fell for the false prosperity doctrine and the Lord pulled us out of it, some of us were laughing at it back in the 1970s. Because back then unbelievers such as Richard Pryor were exposing it on the big screen and the little screen. In my own shame I say I saw Pryor’s skits and still fell for the mess and the Lord had to deliver me from it. (For me that’s proof that Richard Pryor, comedy and laughter can’t save.) It’s a shame Richard Pryor noticed the prosperity doctrine is false, but he never seemed to find the true doctrine of the Lord Jesus himself.

I apologize for the profanity used in the first clip below. And while the person who rejects the pulpit pimp is actually (playing the role of) a Muslim, the clip dramatizes how unbelievers on the street can see through the lie of prosperity heresy better than some who actually do know Jesus is the Christ.

And the following clip is from Richard Pryor’s old TV show.

Now lets see how the real professional pulpit pimps do it and notice the obvious similarities.

The false teachers were pathetic 30 years ago and still are today. Avoid the false prosperity teachers, read your Bible and run from the fakes!

Related post: The Bastardization of the Gospel = The Prosperity Gospel!

Melvin’s blog has suffered another infiltration by hackers, who were using his web resources for nefarious purposes. Who is behind it I don’t know, other than knowing they do the work of their father the devil, but I’ve seen all kinds of sites suffer these kinds of things.

Just wanted to let everyone know the issue is being addressed and Melvin will have the blog back up when he can.

A very short post over at the blog Gay Christian Movement Watch captures Kirbyjon Caldwell showing who he really serves. Man and money.

See the post titled: Newsweek covers Kirbyjon Caldwell ‘exgay’ issue

This shows how so-called pastors will even kick mention of a ministry to the curb, for the sake of political gain and certainly for money. (Kirbyjon Caldwell teaches the heresy known as prosperity doctrine.) With the political gain comes notoriety and higher sales of whatever Caldwell peddles in the future.

Avoid Kirbyjon Caldwell, he’s not standing for the Lord, but to please men.

Related post: Pulpit Pimp Kirbyjon Caldwell Comes Up Lame Against Abomination. To Enhance His Crush On Obama!

I have mentioned many reasons why I can’t personally vote for either of them. And my reasons against them are some of the reasons I have against most everybody else running. (And if I don’t like a US Presidential candidate for the same reasons I don’t like McCain or Obama, trust me, I’ve got other reasons I won’t be voting for them. Yes, I’ve reviewed the entire lot that is running, even the smaller parties and pure Independents also. None are getting my vote, not this time.) But John Sidney McCain, III and Barack Hussein Obama, Junior are the big names favored to win. So I’ll make this post in their regard and it can be understood for others. With McCain and Obama, I’ve pointed out how they both act like something other than Christians, although they claim the faith. So their idolatry alone given 1 Corinthians 5 puts them at a “so-called brother” status of which I’m not to associate myself with. That alone is reason for me to strongly never endorse them. And you who read this blog know I’ve got countless posts more. But there’s really one core reason even if all else was OK, which is why I can’t vote for either man.

Now each side (Obama supporters versus McCain supporters) has their reasons to claim the other fulfills some or all of that scripture noted above. I see it in both of their policies and their own lives in various ways. Most pronounced, being Obama’s advocacy for government permitting murder of babies in the womb and McCain’s advocacy of using babies as lab rats in “embryonic stem cell research”. And there’s much more, but what I’ve noted is more than enough. It is a line I refuse to cross. The bottom line is, they promote things the Lord hates, so I will not and cannot support either of them.

And personally speaking, I feel abortion and “embryonic stem cell research” needs to be nationally banned, as slavery has been. I don’t find “states rights” to be a sufficient solution to the problem. States rights was not sufficient for slavery, so it’s certainly not sufficient for murder.

That’s my opinion and Lord willing I’m sticking to it!

Some may say, well McCain or Obama wants to reduce (or eliminate) the number of a certain style of baby murder while they are permissive of another. I say, I can’t look at a single one of my children and say I’d be OK with losing a single one. So these men that advocate keeping legal the murder of a single American baby for someone’s convenience or medical advancement won’t get my vote.