I’ve been looking for a very long time for a short video that explained fractional lending and the debt spiral it creates. Because often showing you this in video format helps with understanding it better than it being typed out in words. But this video should help you understand why every time the government goes tossing money at problems, it really creates more of a problem rather than actually solving financial issues. This is a game of continually kicking a growing can down the road and hoping that maybe later something might do away with the problem. And the problem only grows.

Please watch the video in full before making comments.

Related posts:

• Some Financial Analysts Are Starting To Claim The US Is Headed For Economic Doom!
• I Might Be Against A Ron Paul Presidency, But You Better Listen To The Man When He’s Talking About The US Economy.
• The Bailout, This Thing Is Just Terrible…
• $700 Billion In Magic Money And Who Knows What Might Be Nationalized Next.
• Credit Cards and Usury in America
• CNN Starting to Report the Truth About the Economy Online. Your Dollar COULD become WORTHLESS.
• Uncomfortable Truth About America’s Banking System, the Federal Reserve. What’s Behind the Economic Issues? Fiat Currency.
• Arab Muslims Continue Buying Up America. Citigroup Makes Abu Dhabi one of its Largest Shareholders.

A thought provoking and edifying video from our brother Brett on YouTube.

Please watch in full before making comments. (It’s only about 8.5 minutes long.)

Always give thanks to God and always share the message of the Lord Jesus.

Seems false teaching pulpit pimps are using the names of precious metals as part of their donation scams. Check out the post at I’m Speaking Truth titled Pimps & Their Resilient Ministries Pimpistries.

I don’t get any sort of pleasure out of making these kinds of posts, but I can’t think of a better way, to warn saints about someone that some of them have been duped into thinking is a “committed Christian”, than to show his actions. So it can be seen plainly, that Obama is simply another politician, no more special, no more greater, than any other who gamed Christians for votes.

And on to the latest example.

Christians are supposed to focus on spiritual growth in Jesus Christ, not bodily exercise.

I’m not saying a workout is bad, but when it’s your choice over a church meeting on the Lord’s Day (Sunday), there’s a big problem.

The article continues:

Asked about the president-elect’s decision to not attend church, a transition aide noted that the Obamas valued their faith experience in Chicago but were concerned about the impact their large retinue may have on other parishioners.

“Because they have a great deal of respect for places of worship, they do not want to draw unwelcome or inappropriate attention to a church not used to the attention their attendance would draw,” said the aide.

Both President-elect George W. Bush and President-elect Bill Clinton managed to attend church in the weeks after they were elected.

In comes the excuses of potentially causing a stir. But that was not a problem for prior Presidents. Regardless of our feelings regarding their standing with Christ, they did make the effort and it was after they got the votes.

In November of 1992, Clinton went to services in Little Rock, Ark., on the three weekends following his election, taking pre-church jogs on the first two and attending on the third weekend a Catholic Mass with the Rev. Jesse Jackson, with whom he was trying to smooth over lingering campaign tensions.

The Presidents usually claim to be real Bible believing Christians, yet they too often are found in the assembly of the cult of Mary at the Roman Catholic Mass.

In the weeks after the contested 2000 election, Bush regularly attended services at Tarrytown United Methodist Church in Austin, Texas, and Al Gore was frequently photographed arriving at and leaving church in Virginia.

On his first day as president-elect, following weeks of Florida recounts and court hearings, Bush went to church with his wife, Laura. They attended an invite-only prayer service on Thursday, Dec. 14, at Tarrytown United Methodist Church. About 300 people attended, including top campaign staff and visiting clergy. During the service, the Rev. Mark Craig, senior pastor at Highland Park United Methodist Church in Dallas, told Bush, “You have been chosen by God to lead the people.”

Invite only prayer service for political figures? That does not square with James 2. In ancient Rome, Senators were elected by Roman citizens and the church abstained from political participation. Now there are church groups that give the publicans special invitation and deny the meeting to others. Romans 13 affirms those who have political rule are allowed their post by God. For them to be an example for God’s wrath or glory. But having church assembly meetings that exclude all but the high profile is a bad example. If a pastor desires to pray for a President and security is a concern, he can always visit the White House and say a prayer.

Obama was an infrequent churchgoer on the campaign trail, though he did make a series of appearances in the pews and pulpits of South Carolina churches ahead of that heavily religious state’s primary.

Obama found his way to church meetings when it was politically expedient.

The issue of where he worships is, of course, fraught. For about two decades, Obama and his family attended Chicago’s Trinity United Church of Christ. But, with the public disclosure earlier this year of incendiary sermons at Trinity by the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Obama and his wife, Michelle, in June resigned their membership in the large South Side congregation.

While denouncing Jeremiah Wright, Obama has never denounced the heresy of Black Liberation Theology and even calls it “the social gospel”.

At the time, the then-Illinois senator said that he didn’t want his “church experience to be a political circus” and expressed regret for the unwanted attention members of the congregation had received, noting that some reporters had taken church bulletins only to call sick members and shut-ins.

Obviously, the media going after the sick and shut-ins was despicable. But there would not have been any circus if Jesus was preached at Chicago’s Trinity United Church of Christ in truth.

During the campaign, Obama returned to Chicago to attend the South Side’s Apostolic Church of God on Father’s Day Sunday to give a speech aimed at the black community on the importance of fatherhood and family.

Hung out at a Oneness spot for another politically expedient venture.

A number of Washington, D.C., churches of different denominations and traditions are now competing to become the spiritual home of the new first family.

The Obama aide said the family “look[s] forward to finding a church community in Washington, D.C.”

Well one has to wonder, if there are any Hindu temples making a bid too?

Related posts:

• President Elect Barack Hussein Obama, Junior. Has Taken And May Continue To Take Counsel From A Homosexual So-Called Bishop.
• Why Presidential Candidate Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. Honestly is Not a Christian.

Let’s play a most serious version of the game, what’s wrong with this picture?

The web site for the Charter for Compassion Project is here.

A listing of the Charter for Compassion Project “Partners” is here.

The group “TED” gets guidance from a “Brain Trust” that is listed here.

Now if you are a Christian and all sorts of alarms are not going off in your mind, after seeing what is shown and linked above. I’ll explain why real Christians should be concerned and avoid the Charter for Compassion Project. Of course Christianity being someone who realizes Jesus is the Christ, Son of God, God in flesh and ONLY hope for salvation. To the glory of the Father, God being Father, Son and Holy Spirit.

Unity That Refuses To Submit To Jesus

Christians already know to show compassion to others. And that is primarily shown through letting others know Jesus is their ONLY hope for salvation. So why should a Christian AVOID signing onto the Charter for Compassion Project? Because the Charter for Compassion Project seeks a Christless form of compassion. Compassion for the sake of humanism, for the glory of a god they feel is the same regardless of doctrine, to the glory of Baal. The abomination of universalism.

Christians have NO bond with people who deny Jesus is the Christ. Any “charter” they claim in the name of “religion” is a charter devoid of the truth. Being done to the glory of humanity and false gods, rather than the glory of the One True God, who sent Jesus as the ONLY mediator between God and man, 1 Timothy 2:5. Christians know to show compassion and do so out of love for Christ, not to water down that compassion in the name of secular humanism and false religion. So I don’t need their charter. The compassion I have is noted in the Bible and I don’t need anyone picking parts of scripture, while refusing to take it whole and seeking for me to join with them in their scripture hacked efforts. And when we speak of “compassion” I doubt what they call compassion is true to scripture’s teachings regarding such subjects. But I’ll address that later in this post, under the area titled “A Christian’s Compassion Versus Secular Humanistic Compassion”.

The Players

As the article mentions, the group TED has figures that are anything but uncompromising Christians. The “Partners” of the Charter for Compassion Project, features groups with a history of standing on the wrong side of 2 Corinthians 6:14-18. Groups such as Union Theological Seminary laud the heresy of Black Liberation Theology. Please see: James Cone, Creator of Black Liberation Theology, Says Whites Salvation Comes via Giving Blacks Money. That group also holds people such as Irene Monroe in high regard, I’ve warned about her in the past. And the viewpoint of Union Theological Seminary is not unique, but a view held by the bunch behind the “Charter for Compassion Project” in general. Consider another “Partner”, the American Society for Muslim Advancement. On their page of “Muslim Leaders for Tomorrow”, see what they say about someone named Scott Siraj Al-Haqq Kugle:

…
His current research explores contemporary Muslim sexuality, including how lesbian, gay and transgendered advocate for supportive communities within the Islamic tradition. He has been quoted in Omid Safi’s book, Progressive Muslims: on gender, justice and pluralism and Voices of Islam and he has been interviewed on a BBC documentary on gay Muslims in 2006.
…

The players in the Charter for Compassion Project are anything but people Christians should be teaming with.

A Christian’s Compassion Versus Secular Humanistic Compassion

As you’ve probably noticed, many of the actual people who will be of greatest influence to the Charter for Compassion Project are not people who see the truth of the following:

They are the people who have done all they could, to remove the truth of those words. Because what the members of the Charter for Compassion Project call “compassion” is really a passion, to promote all forms of desires of the flesh. Christian compassion, is to tell them their efforts to destroy the truth of scripture are unacceptable and they must be avoided unless and until God brings them to repentance in this life. To let them know homosexuality is an abomination before God and all of Leviticus 18 is valid and affirmed in Acts 15, as still being sin and activity nobody claiming the Lord’s name should endorse.

The bottom line is, the Charter for Compassion Project is a movement, that will seek to crush true Christianity.

Conclusion

So you might be saying, “well this might help stop radical Islam”. I can tell you, the radicals of the cult of Muhammad could care less about some “charter”. It’s just like when these far Left groups propose more “gun laws”, while gun criminals could care less what new law is made and law abiding citizens are left inconvenienced. While their opening appears to be against radical groups, it is true Christians who stand against abomination who also will feel this group’s scorn. You don’t think they’re going into the hills of Pakistan, to try and tell the Taliban to change it’s views. No, they are going to be coming for we who are peaceful, trying to turn us to their evil ways. I say the rebuke of 2 John 1:10-11 is theirs. (Which of course means none of their supporters are allow to promote that garbage here.) The people involved in the effort have a long history of promoting all manner of heresy and abomination. Therefore, it is only godly, for Christians to have no part in the so-called Charter for Compassion Project.