Malkin has a good reminder of the direct link between illegal immigration and terrorism. Grant amnesty and you’re giving an untold number of gang members, other assorted law breakers who broke laws possibly BOTH IN MEXICO OR OTHER COUNTRIES AND THE USA and folks who refused to adhere to our laws a pat on the back for their efforts.

And let me say, any “church” that hides an illegal alien is not doing the will of the Lord. That sanctuary is not being provided to escape religious persecution, but to help a law breaker continue breaking the law. Law enforcement SHOULD bust in there and pull the illegals out and charge all who assisted them. I’ll be frank, some Christians are too darn lazy to help an illegal alien do things legally. As in having the illegal alien go back to their home country, helping them and staying in contact with them there and then helping them immigrate into the USA legally at a later date. Just because you claim it’s God’s will does not justify breaking the law. Helping a stranger who is here legally is one thing, but helping a law breaker continue to skirt the a law is a crime in both man and God’s law.

You want to help someone up their pay grade, help them where they are.

Growing up, I saw Jews help thousands of other Jews escape Russia. They used legal means, they didn’t break the law, in helping people who were facing persecution.

Now I could sit here and harp about what is going on in Congress, that would result in amnesty and making it harder for some in your own family to find a job, but why bother? If you really cared about Congress, you would have thrown the bums out (people in Congress who work for Mexico and not the interests of your family) when you had a chance during the last election. I think the bums are calling YOUR BLUFF and while they hold off because you keep catching them trying to grant amnesty, they’ll keep chipping away at it until they do it, because you have not thrown the bums out. And to top it off, new bums like US Senator Bob Corker were allowed in during the primaries. Because he “said” he’d not stand for amnesty, but is likely to flip on that. There was MORE THAN ENOUGH EVIDENCE to prove that Bob Corker was not true to his word even before he won a primary in TN. But folks voted for the man with the biggest money bags anyway. As if the man in the race with the most money is going to care about you when you or your loved one is losing to people who break the law. Most of you don’t have the guts to vote outside of the party system. So quite frankly, I’m sick of repeating the same stuff over and over. My time is better spent talking about matters of the spirit. I’m not saying that I’ll discontinue talk about illegal immigration, I’m still down with GTB and we’ve got plenty in store. But the lackluster concern when it counts, then hooping and hollering once the amnesty bills hit the table is sort of ridiculous to me. Folks, it might already be too late for this round of amnesty, crying is the only thing holding the bums back from granting it, but they could pull it off right now if they wanted to. You’ve got to make it count for real when it’s time to vote and given the last opportunity was missed your next opportunity might have a different set of challenges.

They’ve been calling your bluff for too long. You’d better make it count when given the opportunity or blame yourself when they fail you.

Sometimes an article has way too much good information to cite only part of it, so check out this WorldNetDaily article about Al-Qaida’s latest efforts to recruit American Blacks. The rest of this post assumes you have read that article in full.

Notice how they leverage the words of El Hajj Malik El Shabazz (aka Malcolm X ). Now it is most interesting that they would release a recording in May and reference Shabazz, because his birth date is May 19th. Even the WorldNetDaily failed to notice, because most people simply don’t know, but Black Muslims and your’s truly are aware of this fact. This was totally a play on Black Muslims who admire the man. There’s only a small problem with the efforts of the terrorists. And here I don’t even need to get into Muslim theology, because anyone with an in depth knowledge of El Hajj Malik El Shabazz probably is not going to fall for these terrorists recruitment efforts, only those with cursory knowledge of the man might. And honestly, there are many Blacks who claim the cult of Islam in some form and have little knowledge about El Hajj Malik El Shabazz. Many might say he was just a militant, however he was an advocate of self defense by all available means. By the time he had come to the point where he was murdered, by Black Muslims, he had adjusted his views a bit. He was using legal means to advance his goals and not condoning the use of violence except when needed for self defense. So for violent Muslims to reference someone who had actually pursued less violent means is interesting. Also Blacks who are not well off were facing different circumstances in Shabazz’s day than now. Today Blacks are far more likely to be murdered by a Black person, than ever to be attacked by any racist Whites. The realities of today are not the realities of the 1960s and Shabazz had already cut ties with the Nation of Islam, the group that actually was involved in his murder. Louis Farrakhan even admits he had a role in it. Keep in mind, Farra-the-Con is one who sounds most like the terrorists. So for me, seeing the terrorist attempt to leverage El Hajj Malik El Shabazz is a trick that might work on the least informed of Black Muslims and stupid folks are a terrorist’s best friend. The article notes many stupid Blacks who claim Islam that have already been caught in terrorist plots.

So the terrorists are telling Blacks, instead of making the most of a nation other Blacks gave their lives to change, blow ourselves up and somehow that will make things better, ridiculous!

Their plays on Christianity were interesting, especially considering Christians have led efforts for Blacks including abolition of slavery. The terrorists claim that they reject teachings about Eve, but women in majority Christian and Jewish nations fair far better than women in Muslim nations. The old spin known as the “curse of Ham” was also mentioned. How interesting that I even heard a Christian radio station today correcting this faulty teaching. I always reference this comment from over at BookerRising since it details things well. But it’s also important to note, as a broadcast I heard today mentioned, that Ham had 4 sons, only Canaan was cursed. That curse was fulfilled way back when Israel had rule over those of Canaan. Also Canaan’s people inhabited Sodom and Gomorrah. I don’t think any more needs to be said regarding Canaan knowing that. Now regardless of all that, with Christ we who accept him are not under any forms of curse and avoid judgment to eternal damnation.

So I don’t know what fool might accept the terrorists’ call, but somebody might. Which might make my life more of a hassle at the airport, but so long as I can prove I’m not one of those nuts I’m not bothered. I’ve got Christ and eternal life, while life for a terrorist ends the moment they blow themselves up!

Let’s see, if Christians desired to be like the first Christians or even Jesus, we would not seek to attack anyone, but let Muslims who claim they are in the religion of peace start acting like Muhammad and things go to pieces!

They are surprised by the silence regarding their plight, but this is the new Iraq. The new MUSLIM nation. But some parts of Iraq are safer than others for Christians.

…
As a relatively wealthy community, however, many Christians fell prey to kidnap and ransom gangs and many — probably more than half — of them have fled the country or moved to the relative safety of Iraqi Kurdistan.

Those who are running Christians off want to be like the founder of their cult.

…
Now there are reports that Salafist groups such as Al-Qaeda, fundamentalists who believe Islam can be renewed by returning to the values of the era of the Prophet Mohammed, are targeting Christians on purely sectarian grounds.

In recent weeks a “fatwa” or Muslim religious decree has been issued by extremists ordering Christians to flee Dura, a southern suburb of Baghdad which is a hotbed of Sunni insurgent groups.
…

You see, it’s the religion of peace, because they gave the Christians warning to run before actually trying to kill them, yea that’s it…that’s the ticket!

Now anyone who tells you that Muhammad allowed non-Muslims to live with Muslims in peace, you ask them how much of an ADDITIONAL TAX non-Muslims had to pay (the dhimma) for that supposed peace, which was really nothing more than non-Muslims paying into a religious protection racket. And it is still applied to non-Muslims in many Muslim nations. Just like the slave trading, marriages to 9 year old girls and so on. It’s all so peaceful when you let them do their dirt.

All those mostly Christian troops fighting in Iraq, to create a new Muslim nation, while most of the native Christians are having to run for their lives, at the same time the Muslim kids get a new school. Is it just me, or does something about that not jive well with you?

We don’t hear of a meeting this large with such a strong rebuke from these guys until they see it happening in their neighborhoods.

Did you notice the words “against administration of an Islamic country”? That’s important to note, because check this out later in the article:

…
One of the resolutions said that the country had been built in the name of Islam and it was the government’s responsibility to take action to eliminate indecency and immorality in order not to provide opportunity to non-state elements to take law into their hands.

The declaration, signed by prominent clerics, including Mualana Fazlur Rehman, said that people were being instigated to rush to Islamabad and participate in Jihad. “Masses are being instigated through provocative statements, pamphlets, telephonic address and slogans to provoke them.

Notice, they are against attacks in a country built in the name of Islam. This declaration that appears on the surface to be a strong rebuke against radical Islam. (What Osama bin Laden calls “pure Islam”.) Does not address any acts of radicalism outside of PAKISTAN. In other words, it’s bad when it’s on their own turf, but they are mute regarding attacks elsewhere.

So there you have it folks, a nicely packaged rebuke against radical Islam. If you live in Pakistan. Because they expect the Islamic government to do the job of enforcing things like possibly killing women they feel engaged in fornication.

I’ll allow Robert Spencer to get you up to speed on this one.

Nothing more needs to be said. If you didn’t catch all the red flags and conflicts of interests in that one, you need to go read a book.

I’ve been waiting for this and was holding back from saying a word till it came out.

Notice that the Iranian data agreed with the British GPS data (although at a slightly different position), that the sailors were in Iraqi waters and then all of a sudden they came up with corrected data . CNN has an image of all the reported positions and you can see how the Iranians changed their coordinates. It’s obvious the Iranians are full of it and hoping everybody forgets they are trying to build a nuke!

There have questions asked about mounting a “rescue”. Let’s face it, that’s never going to work. Either the Brits are going to be able to press Iran to release the sailors they have KIDNAPPED, or the British will have to opt for all out war with Iran. And you won’t hear me complain if the Brits decide to help Iran see first hand what a working nuke looks like.

I say those Imams can’t be trusted and I’m glad Congress for the most part is in agreement. Hot Air has the media report and more commentary. The roll call vote of 304-121 shows that MOST DEMOCRATS VOTED AGAINST THE MOTION AND ONLY DEMOCRATS VOTED AGAINST IT.

Now you know who is on your side when you fly. Take a look at all the typical Liberal Democrats who voted “NO”.

Related post: Lying Flying Imams May Sue Airline Passengers, to Intimidate People Who Spot Terrorists.

The United Arab Emirates is out to get yet another American company that helps provide our defense. Oh, but the government says it’s A-OK…

I think every deal like this is a security problem, but it seems the UAE may soon own yet another company that is supposed to help keep America secure.

Hat tip Michael Savage.

Related posts:

• Halliburton Shifting its Corporate Headquarters From Houston to Dubai. That is Bad News!
• Bush Approves Dubai Buying Defense Supplier. The UAE Now Owns Doncasters!
• Democratic and Republican Families Play Both Sides of Portgate

Well that’s my opinion of them. Check out the details over at Fire & Hammer.

I say it’s all a well designed effort to weaken US security. And I feel these men enjoy every time the USA is attacked.

Their lawyer Omar Mohammedi claims they might go after people who they feel were “prejudiced” towards Muslims. This is all part of a WELL COORDINATED effort, to ensure that any terrorist profiling is made illegal. In my opinion, they would rather Americans act like they did before 9/11. When we saw things that didn’t look right and ignored them. America and other nations have thwarted MANY terrorist plots, based on looking into suspicious behavior and recognizing aspects common to terrorists. America has to stand against this form of intimidation.

That’s not a question for you, that’s a question for our President. Given he tells us that the Saudis are our “ally” in the war on terror. Robert Spencer has the details of why I ask this question over at Hot Air.

Maybe I’m the crazy one, because I didn’t think “allies” mixed with “axis of evil”…