This is proof that voting for a Liberal simply because he aligns with some of your views will still burn you! When voters in NJ voted for Democrat James E. McGreevey, they had no idea they were also voting for so-called gay marriage, but in fact they were. Of course if given a vote, the people of NJ would outlaw morally depraved efforts to place anything but one man and one woman into an institution with the name “marriage”. Just as is happening all across this nation and Thank God will soon happen here in Tennessee. The voters in NJ voted for McGreevey because they thought the Liberal was someone they agreed with, but now they have been burned. And many in NJ still don’t even realize it was him that burned them.

Yesterday Dr. Michael Savage uncovered that McGreevey loaded up the NJ Supreme Court with pro-gay activist judges. Of the 4 judges in the majority of the 4-3 ruling, that voted for homosexuals to be treated as if they were heterosexual. 3 of those judges were appointed by none other than Liberal Democrat and formerly down-low gay sex at highway rest stops James E. McGreevey. (Yes heterosexual fornication is also a sin, but McGreevey was engaging in depraved unnatural activity with any man he could get his hands on. While he had a wife and kids at home!) McGreevey claimed he was against gay marriage, to stealthily win the Governorship and then stacked the court with judges that would favor it. Everyone knew he was a Liberal Democrat and simply hoped he was not “that Liberal”. The bottom line is that all candidates prove to be a bit more Liberal once in office than they told voters they were when running for office. So if a candidate seems to be fairly Liberal like McGreevey, you have to assume he’s actually a far Left Liberal, willing to allow all manner of sin to be not just allowed, but actually encouraged by the state with special recognition, licensing and benefits.

Of the judges on the NJ Supreme Court 3 were nominated by McGreevey and 4 by former Republican Governor Christine Todd Whitman. Only one of Withman’s appointed judges sided with McGreevey’s picks. At 75% she did pretty good! I’m not saying Whitman is very Conservative, because I never felt she was, but she is more of a Conservative than McGreevey. Savage details it all here on his web site.

The bottom line is that the people of NJ need to press for the ability to amend their state’s constitution to end this mess. And everyone across the nation should press for a Constitutional amendment that affirms state recognized marriage in America can only be between one man and one woman. As I continually mention, Utah was not allowed into the Union until that state and its largest religious body denounced polygamy. Certainly they would not have been permitted with gays calling themselves married. America has always been against so-called gay marriage, to the point of it being so obvious that nobody felt a need to waste paper on making laws to outlaw it before now. Keep in mind there were laws against fornication and sodomy. America had a level of sexual morality, that homosexual-activists are trying to tear away. Americans regardless of their race or status do not want gays calling themselves “married” and if Americans want to stop it they will need to eventually do so on the federal level. Because if not, the gay activists will press their own claim on the federal level. Just as immoral baby killers pressed the federal courts about the issue of abortion when some states outlawed it. Pro-gay Liberals will do the same with this issue of who can be called “married” in America. The attitude of Americans against gays’ efforts is far stronger than even the effort to prevent the intentionally targeted killing of babies in the womb. So there is no shortage of people who are against the pro-gay lobby. But those who are against that lobby must press the case to the highest level or the pro-gay lobby will.

Also, legislative bodies need the ability to be able to over-ride a court ruling with a 2/3 majority vote. This will ensure in cases where courts grossly overstep their bounds, the issue can be swiftly corrected. The NJ court did not uphold law, they made it. And the people need a means to press for removal of such insane rulings. Savage feels the judges themselves should be removed. Down here in the South, we vote for our judges to obtain and maintain their posts. So it’s very easy for us to remove the ones who don’t act right. Maybe that’s why you have not seen any Southern court ruling for gays to call themselves “married”.

The gay lifestyle is, unnatural, unhealthy and unproductive. Which is why Jesus said:

Hear Michael Savage speaking about NJ and issues of sexual morality using the audio link below.
Michael Savage on NJ and sexual morality – WMA Audio (Size: 682 KB)
(If linking, please link to this post, not the audio file. For the sake of bandwidth there will be no other formats made.)

The folks at U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) asked me if they could send me updates about our war against enemies in places like Iraq and Afghanistan. I told them sure, because I figured there are times they are trying to get out information that you and I might want to know about, but the MSM is probably not going to report it. Although I’m sure CENTCOM sends them press releases.

This latest piece of information from them interests me greatly and probably you too, but lets see if you can find a US based MSM outlet that says much about it. If they say anything at all I’m sure it will be less than they say about news that might put a negative spin on efforts to defeat the enemy.

Of course if I were running the court there might be more than 5 sentenced to death, but I’ll accept the court’s ruling .

Now I’m sure reports like this have been made in the past and I never knew about them, because our lovely US MSM says very little or nothing about it. The only Iraqi court hearings we ever hear about in the MSM, is when Saddam wants to run his mouth in court.

Notice how the terrorists were convicted and sentenced in Iraqi courts in less than 2 years time. Some in just a matter of months! If those same terrorists were on trial here in the USA, they’d still be awaiting sentencing and once sentenced they would get light sentances. Isn’t that amazing that Iraqi courts better recognize the threat of terrorists than American courts? You’d think the nation that launched the effort to stamp out Islamists would better recognize the threat than the nation that lives under Islam.

update 10/19/2006 8:50PM: So I got the press release at noon and it’s almost 9 hours later. So far a Google News search shows that only one site in their news search engine is carrying this story. And that site is a military news site.

You mean to tell me Katie didn’t run with this story as the lead tonight ?

First Zacarias Moussaoui gets life in prison and now Lynne Stewart only gets 28 months. At this rate, if Osama bin Laden were captured he’d be sentenced to 30 days in a halfway house!

Hot Air ran a piece in preparation for the sentencing, with all the details of Stewart’s crime and then like me was disappointed with the final verdict.

You know what time it is… Who can best express the frustration, with seeing enemies who aid those who chant “Death to America” getting off easy? Well on this one it was none other than Michael Savage. He like Hot Air, noted the judge John George Koeltl is a Clinton appointee who was a Watergate special prosecutor. Even Stewart mentioned he was practically patting her on the back before sentencing. This is a judge that should be removed from his post. And this case should be retried.

There were claims that Stewart could not do a long time in prison because of breast cancer, but I think Savage said it best when he said:

You can be a traitor with breast cancer or you can be a patriot with breast cancer!

Regardless of her medical condition, she deserved a trial that should have resulted in the President executing the death penalty on the White House lawn!

You do have to have some level of concern that Democrats running the government might result in more terrible judges and results like this.

I also think the crowds supporting Stewart are a concern. Are they all idiots or conscious enemies of America? Remember, even the more Leftward leaning types in Europe are starting to understand there is a real issue at hand. Going light on Islamic nuts and their allies only encourages the enemy. Those nuts in the crowds supporting Stewart won’t know what hit them until it’s too late!

Pray and educate, that’s all we can do. Because we are in the midst of a very serious war and some people think it’s all fabricated.

Check out Savage’s take. He might be ranting, but he offers plenty of details worth noting.
Michael Savage on the Lynne Stewart verdict – MP3 Audio (Size: 1.96 MB)
(If linking, please link to this post, not the audio file. For the sake of bandwidth there will be no other formats made.)

And this is why I usually read and initial every page in multi-page legal documents.

Doe vs. Bolton was ruled on the same day as the original Roe v. Wade case.

Keep in mind Norma McCorvey, the original “Jane Roe” is now Pro-Life.

Hat tip Michael Savage.

The people of Indiana are hoping for a chance to vote on a constitutional amendment to ensure marriage remains a union of one man and one woman. In the mean time they have a law on the books that helps defend marriage until that time. This prevents the perverted Pro-Gay Lobby’s efforts to try and have the state offer special recognition to gays that feel they should be granted a status reserved for one man and one woman that make their union official – married. One of the cornerstones of defending marriage is the fact it is the best environment for raising children. Indiana’s Supreme Court fails to make that connection and has approved of the adoption of children by couples that are not married. They can be unmarried male/female fornicators, they can be a gay couple and the state’s high court feels they are just fine for raising children.

It is harder, but possible for a single person to raise a child. And a single person can keep themselves from exposing a child to sins like fornication. Plus there are plenty of cases where 2 parents have failed in their duties and someone like an older widow might take in the child for care. A married couple adopting is optimal, but other than that a single person that does not expose the child to negative influences is all that should be allowed. Couples that are “shacking up” should not be allowed to adopt children. Adoption is a privilege that should not be granted to straight unmarried or gay couples. The people in the state of Indiana are in the process of rejecting privileges for gay couples and unmarried couples have no privileges either. Therefore they should not be allowed the privilege of adopting a child.

An unmarried heterosexual couple exposes a child to out of wedlock sex, which may have been the conditions the child was conceived in. An adopting family should be able to provide better, not raise the child in an environment of sin that could continue a cycle of out of wedlock sex and children born outside of wedlock. A gay couple simply is a sinful non-productive entity and so children should not be raised in such conditions via state approved adoption.

For Indiana’s Supreme Court to allow such an endorsement of sinful “couples” runs counter to efforts in the state to defend marriage and good social order.

Many states once had laws to prevent fornication and sodomy. Now Liberal judges have removed those laws and turned established social order on its head, by allowing the same people that once would have been charged with a crime to adopt children. These kinds of legal matters like state approved immoral forms of adoption used to never exists, because once upon a time America knew better.