<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Independent Conservative &#187; Judiciary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.independentconservative.com/category/judiciary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.independentconservative.com</link>
	<description>The Independent Conservative saying what needs to be said!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:39:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Death for a Child Rapist is Not &#8220;Cruel&#8221; or &#8220;Unusual&#8221; Punishment.  States&#8217; Rights Trounced Once Again.</title>
		<link>http://www.independentconservative.com/2008/06/25/death-for-a-child-rapist-is-not-cruel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.independentconservative.com/2008/06/25/death-for-a-child-rapist-is-not-cruel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IndependentConservative</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rapists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[us]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentconservative.com/?p=1927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For background, read this article first.  Then read La Shawn Barber&#8217;s post titled Supreme Court Rejects Death for Child Rapists.  There she asks:

Do you believe child rapists should get the death penalty, whether or not they?ve killed the child?

I was going to post the following as a comment on her blog, but it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.independentconservative.com/2008/06/25/death-for-a-child-rapist-is-not-cruel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Supreme Court Rules Some Babies Deserve Life.  Upholds Partial Birth Abortion Ban!</title>
		<link>http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/04/18/partial_birth_murder_ban_unheld/</link>
		<comments>http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/04/18/partial_birth_murder_ban_unheld/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 19:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IndependentConservative</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Judiciary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentconservative.com/?p=1339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess we&#8217;ll take what we can get.



Supreme Court Upholds Partial-Birth Abortion Ban on 5-4 Decision

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) &#8212; The Supreme Court has reversed a decision it handed down in 2000 and upheld a Congressional ban on the gruesome partial-birth abortion procedure. The ruling indicated that the federal ban on the abortion procedure did not [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/04/18/partial_birth_murder_ban_unheld/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Climate Change Cultists Ripping Your Rights Away While You Slumber!  US Supreme Court Demands CO2 Regulation. (Audio)</title>
		<link>http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/04/03/scotus_co2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/04/03/scotus_co2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 15:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IndependentConservative</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judiciary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentconservative.com/?p=1309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The cult of Albert Gore Jr. is having a direct impact on your life and nobody seems to care much about it.  Your US Supreme Court has ruled, that via the EPA the government must regulate CO2 emissions in the United States of America.  You probably have not thought much about this matter. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/04/03/scotus_co2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Proof That Terrorists Should Not be Tried in US Courts.  Millennium Bomber Gets a Break From 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.</title>
		<link>http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/01/16/courts_nice_to_terrorists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/01/16/courts_nice_to_terrorists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 22:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IndependentConservative</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism and War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentconservative.com/?p=1166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once again the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals stabs America in the back.  While some praised the court for their decision regarding the Mt. Soledad Cross, I knew they&#8217;d let America down again and it only took them a day.  They&#8217;ve overturned one of the convictions against the millennium bomber, who was [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/01/16/courts_nice_to_terrorists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keith Ellison/Hakim/X Ellison/Ellison-Muhammad on US House Judiciary and Financial Services Committees</title>
		<link>http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/01/12/ellison_judicial_committee/</link>
		<comments>http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/01/12/ellison_judicial_committee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 22:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IndependentConservative</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism and War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentconservative.com/?p=1159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just the guy you DON&#8217;T want on those committees gets placed there.  Thanks for nothing Democrats.



Ellison named to Judiciary Committee

WASHINGTON ? Rep. Keith Ellison has been named to the House Judiciary Committee, a panel that has oversight over issues such as civil liberties, immigration and courts.
&#8230;
&#8220;I look forward to pursuing a progressive agenda in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/01/12/ellison_judicial_committee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pro-Homosexual James E. McGreevey Stacked the NJ Supreme Court With Activists.  Judiciary Run Amuck! (Audio)</title>
		<link>http://www.independentconservative.com/2006/10/26/mcgreevey_stacked_court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.independentconservative.com/2006/10/26/mcgreevey_stacked_court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 14:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IndependentConservative</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuts on Parade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentconservative.com/?p=1018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is proof that voting for a Liberal simply because he aligns with some of your views will still burn you!  When voters in NJ voted for Democrat James E. McGreevey, they had no idea they were also voting for so-called gay marriage, but in fact they were.  Of course if given a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.independentconservative.com/2006/10/26/mcgreevey_stacked_court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yes, Iraqi Courts are Sentencing Some Terrorists to Death!</title>
		<link>http://www.independentconservative.com/2006/10/19/iraq_sentance_terrorists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.independentconservative.com/2006/10/19/iraq_sentance_terrorists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 17:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IndependentConservative</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism and War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentconservative.com/?p=1007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The folks at U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) asked me if they could send me updates about our war against enemies in places like Iraq and Afghanistan.  I told them sure, because I figured there are times they are trying to get out information that you and I might want to know about, but the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.independentconservative.com/2006/10/19/iraq_sentance_terrorists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lynne Stewart Helped the Enemy and Gets 28 Months in Prison.  Deserved Death. (Audio)</title>
		<link>http://www.independentconservative.com/2006/10/17/stewart_gets_off_easy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.independentconservative.com/2006/10/17/stewart_gets_off_easy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 06:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IndependentConservative</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism and War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentconservative.com/?p=1003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First Zacarias Moussaoui gets life in prison and now Lynne Stewart only gets 28 months.  At this rate, if Osama bin Laden were captured he&#8217;d be sentenced to 30 days in a halfway house!
Hot Air ran a piece in preparation for the sentencing, with all the details of Stewart&#8217;s crime and then like me [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.independentconservative.com/2006/10/17/stewart_gets_off_easy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mother Says ACLU Attorney Duped Her in Landmark 1973 Abortion Case.  Claims She&#8217;s Pro-Life and Never Saw Papers Filed in Court.</title>
		<link>http://www.independentconservative.com/2006/09/29/aclu_pro_baby_killing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.independentconservative.com/2006/09/29/aclu_pro_baby_killing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 22:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IndependentConservative</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Judiciary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentconservative.com/?p=963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And this is why I usually read and initial every page in multi-page legal documents.



Woman says ACLU attorney pushed her to have abortion in landmark 1973 case

In a case being closely watched by conservatives, the Supreme Court plans to hear a suit to reverse the Doe vs. Bolton abortion decision in 1973. 
Sandra Cano, the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.independentconservative.com/2006/09/29/aclu_pro_baby_killing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>While People in Indiana Fight to Defend Marriage, Their High Court Allows Unmarried &#8220;Couples&#8221; to Adopt Children.</title>
		<link>http://www.independentconservative.com/2006/08/08/in_allows_unmarried_adoption/</link>
		<comments>http://www.independentconservative.com/2006/08/08/in_allows_unmarried_adoption/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 04:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IndependentConservative</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Judiciary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuts on Parade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentconservative.com/?p=878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The people of Indiana are hoping for a chance to vote on a constitutional amendment to ensure marriage remains a union of one man and one woman.  In the mean time they have a law on the books that helps defend marriage until that time.  This prevents the perverted Pro-Gay Lobby&#8217;s efforts to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.independentconservative.com/2006/08/08/in_allows_unmarried_adoption/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

