Jesse Jackson is in Atlanta running his Poverty Pimp for personal fame game. Below is an article I’ve cited some portions of, that show what Jesse Jackson is jumping about this time and how bogus his latest complaints are.

Now notice that many are ready to get out of blighted developments and move on to something better. Let’s be honest, moving on means the possibility of being in an area with LESS CRIME, so there is a better environment for those who are working to do better for themselves, minus distractions like HIGH CRIME.

Let’s also keep in mind, that if Jesse Jackson were in fact a “reverend” (which I don’t recognize him as) he would be going to saints and churches to solicit assistance to the poor, not the government. He would be asking the MANY PULPIT PIMPS IN ATLANTA why are they driving all manner of luxury vehicles, while people around them are in need? (Let’s not even begin to get into the needs of poor saints elsewhere.) But the fact is, this is all one big game. If there is no concentration of poor people on the government dole, Jesse has a harder time finding ways to keep himself in the news.

But given Jesse Jackson is hoping for the government to do instead of seeking to have churches do, we have to understand that when you want from the government, you’re going to have to deal with the government’s methods. We are talking about government, not the church. Regarding people who receive the most benefit after putting the least in. What common sense does it make for a government to keep people it’s paying to house in places that are hard to maintain and financially detrimental to the city as a whole? NONE! The more money the city has, the better it can provide services to all. We’re not talking about homeless people being denied any assistance from government, this debate is over what is being given. I see government offering housing under a set of guidelines to encourage people to work and remain on a job. Jesse Jackson sees not good enough and that is ALWAYS what he sees. What would be good enough for Jesse Jackson? My good friend Ron_B aka Constructive Feedback, who runs The Cultural Strategist blog captured audio of Jesse Jackson speaking to Atlanta’s Liberal African American Crying Station where racism against Whites is the norm “Black Talk” radio station WAOK-AM. He sent a copy to me because of his disbelief in what Jesse Jackson said. Here are things in the audio that Jesse Jackson would like to see in public housing facilities:

• Study Facilities
• Home Computers
• Job Training
• Day Care
• Treadmills
• Elliptical Machines
• Swimming Pools
• Basketball Goals
• Skating Rinks
• Computer Labs

The WAOK-AM host responded “right” to Jesse Jackson complaining about no “treadmills”. Of course Bush was blamed as you would expect.

Many of us are not going to speak against study facilities and job training. But notice the things like home computers, FREE day care, treadmills, elliptical training machines, swimming pools, basketball, skating rinks and computer labs. MANY PEOPLE NOT IN PUBLIC HOUSING DON’T EVEN HAVE MANY OF THESE THINGS! When it comes to using taxpayer dollars, if you’re going to request it be redistributed to the poor, you’d do much better to leave your requests at basic needs and allow the individuals to handle amenities themselves.

Personally, I think some churches could make an opportunity out of offering child care services, because then the church would have most of the day to train up children with the salvation message of the Lord Jesus Christ, teach them good manners for school and how to be good citizens. And lets be honest, many kids from public housing are not models of good discipline in the classroom. Of course the church doing it would require not being locked into a government program, so the message of Christ could be told freely. It would mean that churches would have to spend money on children instead of buildings. But I don’t even think churches would offer things like ellipticals . I thought getting a workout would be a lesser concern given 1 Timothy 4:8, but who am I? Many kids in the suburbs spend more time in the books instead of on a basketball court and it seems to work out well for them come test time.

You can hear Jesse Jackson spewing his insanity after his rock star entrance, using the audio link below.

Jesse Jackson on WAOK-AM complaining about public housing - MP3 Audio (Size: 1.15 MB)

This is a post where I’m having to separate a person’s political viewpoint from their statements regarding spiritual matters. A rarity for me, but with Jesse Lee Peterson, it seems he stands for good morals, good social values and he and I agree on probably most political matters. However, the man’s a false teacher. Because his teaching on matters regarding Christianity is not Christianity at all. So he must be noted as one who stands in opposition to the faith, unless the Lord calls him out of his ignorance and he comes to his senses.

Hubison left the comment to expose Peterson and I would be remiss if I did not make this post to warn other saints about Peterson. Hubison properly warned me and I am now warning the rest of you saints who care to contend for the faith, that while Peterson might make some good political and social points, we should not count him as a leader in the church. He’s not a Christian and he’s a false teacher.

To fully understand why I’m saying these things, listen to the following:

• Olivet Discourses Jessie Peterson Interview Part “1″
• Olivet Discourses Jessie Peterson Interview Part “2″

Listen to both parts in full, even the discussion after Peterson has to leave.

Hubison says that our brother in Christ, Pastor John Coleman did that interview with Jesse Lee Peterson 11 years ago.

Those audio files are from John Coleman’s website and listed with the names noted above. I placed copies here, to save Pastor John a little on bandwidth costs, but I highly recommend that you check out his site and his online radio programs.

Many of us shed no tear for the NAACP and it’s about time they closed up shop. Sure if they want to have efforts that are actually worthwhile in 2007, like mentoring and tutoring, fine, change the name and do it, but all the Civil Rights Industry posturing is old and tired. La Shawn Barber also says they need to shut the thing down. I had an opportunity to call into the BJ Ellis show yesterday, as BJ was giving his take on this.

You can get the broadcast schedule for his show here.

Check out the audio of my call to BJ using the audio link below. After my call, BJ gets into the matter of Ray Nagin, who has been sticking up for that nut William Jefferson and is considering a run for Jefferson’s congressional seat. Worth a listen.

We also talked a little about Gary Sheffield’s crying. Sheffield needs to play ball and keep his mouth shut, because he uses his arms and legs much better than his mouth. Here’s a funny pic from Sheffield’s past, a jerri curl, !

BJ Ellis on the NAACP and Ray Nagin - ASF Audio (Size: 1.18 MB)
(If linking, please link to this post, not the media file. For the sake of bandwidth there will be no other formats made.)

Well this is really something. Imus has been fired by BOTH MSNBC and CBS. The Duke rape accuser Crystal Gail Mangum walks away with no charges. Although she kept up a lie and now the accused have had all charges against them dropped, after lots of money and calls for their heads. The lie tied up government resources, that could have been used to work on real crimes, but the false accuser walks. Rappers (and others in the music industry) can continue saying the word “ho” and worse. While no protests are launched against stations playing it or advertisers of those stations. Hypocrites like Al Sharpton and T.D. Jakes rule the day.

And do we even need to talk about how R. Kelly still gets airplay despite all his mess? Never mind some of his trash lyrics.

Well I think this is just nutty. But I’ve got something in response. My favorite gansta rap song. That’s right. I’ve got a favorite gansta rap song. I never told you about it, but my man Michael Savage wrote it as a sort of joke on a real gansta rap song that he heard. Savage did it on his show over 2 years ago. I’ve still got the audio. I even cut out just that part and play it to myself for laughs about how true garbage is allowed to flow over airwaves on a regular basis. Once you hear it, you’ll see what I mean.

So check out a Michael Savage classic from 3/16/2005. Where Michael Savage raps. And I enjoy laughing at every second of it, just like he did. The entire audience of Savage’s show, we all found it to be most entertaining, in a funny sort of way. Actually this rap from Savage originally aired before 3/16/2005, but I recorded it on 3/16/2005, because a caller requested that it be played again and I was able to capture the audio then.

So enjoy Michael Savage using the audio link below. Because trash rappers can make excuses about their use of the term and I’ve even heard Al Sharpton saying they are not comparable to Imus, but it’s all trash and the rapper trash gets a lot more rotation than Imus trash. So when will those who claim they care for women go after the real big trash producers? We know what the trash rappers really think about women. A true fighter against trash on the airwaves like C. Delores Tucker is dead and all we’ve got are a bunch of lame hypocrites left!

Michael Savage raps, recorded 3/16/2005 - WMA Audio (Size: 685 KB)
(If linking, please link to this post, not the media file. For the sake of bandwidth there will be no other formats made.)

The cult of Albert Gore Jr. is having a direct impact on your life and nobody seems to care much about it. Your US Supreme Court has ruled, that via the EPA the government must regulate CO2 emissions in the United States of America. You probably have not thought much about this matter. About how a big lie is literally being leveraged to control your entire life. And I mean your entire life. Because the mess won’t stop with corporations and the increased prices you’ll have to pay and the longer hours you’ll have to work to pay those higher costs. Oh no, eventually the cult will be leveraged for one of the ultimate goals under the cult known as Liberalism, which is to control the womb. You might hear the Left claim that we Conservatives are the ones who attempt to control the womb by keeping babies from being murdered in it, but you will find it is the Left that really wants to control the womb via population control. Don’t believe me? Well have a look at this link, that was passed along to this blog by reader Julie.

Notice how the mind of the environmentalist works and compare that with the warning from the apostle Paul.

The United Nations Population Fund claims to be helping people in the 3rd world, when actually they are doing all they can to kill poor people’s babies. Your babies are next, the Liberals just need to exact more power via government to deal with you.

You’ve got a demon inspired death cult looking you square in the face and many of you probably don’t even realize it.

And of course, since they don’t like anyone to oppose them, Julie also found that they are working to shut people like me up.

Champion of our legal system, Mark Levin sees what happened in the high court yesterday and has sounded the alarm for you to WAKE UP. Yesterday’s ruling was not a minor ruling, but a MAJOR one, that will impact you for the rest of your natural life. How long before the view that you are a pollutant and must be regulated is leveraged to control how many more polluting humans can be born in this country?

Of course Mark Levin uses strong language and he’s probably the first to tell you he’s no saint, but listen to what the man has to say. He’s not the type to crack out a Bible and read you verses, but my view and his view show that no matter what level you view yesterday’s ruling from, it was a bad thing to see it happen. Levin speaks about freedom, I speak about cultists running your life. Either way, you lost and didn’t even know it.

Hear Mark Levin using the audio link below.
Mark Levin on yesterday’s SCOTUS CO2 ruling - ASF Audio (Size: 2.05 MB)
(If linking, please link to this post, not the media file. For the sake of bandwidth there will be no other formats made.)

When someone who has been in the US Senate for almost a full 15 years gets caught in some mess like this you’d expect far more coverage. But search Google News and you’ll see that as of now there are only 4 results. 3 of those results are Blogs, Stop the ACLU, Hot Air and Jawa Report (first listed blog to post about this). The other is World Net Daily’s coverage. The source article came from a small Left wing outfit, that does not even register with Google’s news service. When I saw Jawa picked this up last night I figured the whole world would be talking about it today, but that’s not the case. So I’ve got to help get this one out.

What am I talking about? I’m talking about what could be the greatest scandal to rock a US Senator in a long time. It is possible, that Democratic US Senator Dianne (take your guns and let mothers kill babies) Feinstein was using her power in MILCON (Senate’s Military Construction Appropriations subcommittee), to funnel contract deals to her husband AND ignoring troops in need of better medical care.

She should be GONE (if this is true, as in out of politics and in prison), but nobody (in the MSM or Congress) is saying a word. Michael Savage was sent the article by someone connected with the source publication and it seems if not for him almost nobody would know much at all about this. (Now we’ll have to hear Savage brag again about how he got the scoop if/when this does break in the MSM .)

So since Savage told most of us who know, I might as well allow him to tell you.

Hear Michael Savage tell it all using the audio link below.
Michael Savage on Dianne Feinstein MILCON scandal - ASF Audio (Size: 2.12 MB)
(If linking, please link to this post, not the media file. For the sake of bandwidth there will be no other formats made.)

Although some people won’t allow her to expose Imam Husham Al-Husainy for the enemy of America that he really is, Michael Reagan allowed Debbie Schlussel to do so on his show last night. Today Sean Hannity had the Imam on his radio show. OK I said I would not listen, but I saw he would have the Imam on and I had to check if he would finally be true to his word and allow Ms. Schlussel on. He did not. Again it was a one on one. Hannity failed to ask the probing questions that Schlussel wants to ask Imam Husham Al-Husainy. And a thank you to Ms. Schlussel for enjoying this blog and mentioning my previous post.

Of course if Hannity had used her questions he’d be compelled to give her credit. So since his interview was really nothing new, there is no need to post any of his audio here. Hannity did say to the Imam “you support Hezbollah”, how does Hannity know that? And he asked the Imam what he thinks about Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, what spurred him to ask that? I think the information he obtained from Debbie Schlussel is the answer to both those questions. She mentioned those things and more in her writing, based on her own personal research and mentioned those things last night on Michael Reagan’s show. Schlussel thinks the Imam is an agent for Iran.

Michael Reagan asked Schlussel why President Bush and the Democrats have associated themselves with this shady Imam. She said that Bush was just pulling for any Muslim that would support the effort in Iraq and that was before the Imam made many of the Islamists statements he’s made more recently. Still she does not feel this is any excuse and that Bush should have NEVER associated himself with Al-Husainy. She feels the Democrats have pulled him in because they also wish to appear favorable to Muslims.

During the show Schlussel did not pull any punches and said most Muslim clerics in America are not moderate. Regardless of whether they are Shia or Sunni. Maybe some people are surprised to hear that, but I’m not. I’m not surprised at all by who the Imam is or what he did. That’s why I never posted about it before. I was asked about it and said I was not surprised. What did everyone expect? For the man to say he loves Israel right where it is, that Abraham was a Jew, that Jesus came to earth in flesh as a Jew that is the righteous Son of God and that Muhammad was a false prophet? If that’s what everyone expected from the man behind the mic they should have called me and I would have told those Democrats that plus a few other things. Because somebody needs to pray regarding the slaughter in the womb their endorsement of abortion has caused.

Hear some clips of Michael Reagan and Debbie Schlussel using the audio link below.
Michael Reagan and Debbie Schlussel discuss Muslim Imam Husham Al-Husainy - MP3 Audio (Size: 2.57 MB)
(If linking, please link to this post, not the media file. For the sake of bandwidth there will be no other formats made.)

So I noticed John Edwards was going to be on NBC’s Meet the Press yesterday and I knew this would be the interview that sinks Edwards. The same way Russert destroyed Edwards the last time he ran for President. (I’m no fan of NBC as a network, but when the nuts come out I’ve got to expose them, even if it means mentioning an NBC program.) The MSM is focused on how Edwards talked about raising taxes for his various social programs. But he’s a Liberal, nothing new there. If you want to read about that, get the show’s transcript here. What I found interesting in the interview and what the MSM is not making headlines out of, is John Edwards’ views on Iran and people who choose to live life as homosexuals/gays.

John Edwards said this when specifically asked about Iran’s efforts to acquire THE BOMB.

MR. RUSSERT: Would President Edwards allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon?

SEN. EDWARDS: I—there’s no answer to that question at this moment.
…

This man has gone from voting in favor of attacking Iraq, when he felt Saddam possessed and/or might acquire dangerous weapons, to now waffling regarding Iran by avoiding a firm answer to the question. Either you’re going to allow that nut to get THE BOMB or you’re not and even many who claim they won’t really will. So it’s obvious to me that Edwards would do nothing. In fact, Edwards wants to make the same mistake we’ve already made with North Korea, by trying to bribe Iran from building a nuclear weapon. Using the old “carrot and sticks” policy, that politicians love to talk about. The problem with the actual application of this policy, is that we end up always giving them all the carrots and never use the stick. Even after they break every rule imposed on them. Never mind the issues involved with bribing a major sponsor of terrorists! Can you say “Hezbollah“? A vote for Edwards is a vote for Iran having nuclear weapons PLUS our money, in my opinion.

Then there’s Edwards’ thoughts on the gay lifestyle and those who choose to indulge in that form of sin. Edwards does not even feel it is a sin. So he’s way out of step with the Southern Baptist doctrine, that he says he grew up in. I guess John Edwards now disagrees with the very Bible he grew up reading, which says via the apostle Paul:

He says he does not wish to “impose” his views on gays regarding marriage. But by not moving to ban gays’ efforts to be called “married” on the Federal level, he’s allowing them to impose their sinful views on the rest of the nation, by trying to have government give special sanction to their sinful behavior. The bottom line is that this WILL NOT remain a state debated issue. Just like with abortion, Liberals will press the issue until Federal courts give them their way, if the Federal legislature does not move to stop them. Without pressure from the Executive branch, it is less likely that the Legislative branch will do anything at all. Legislators will watch courts impose and claim it’s not their fault. Sound leadership is necessary to prevent this.

Edwards feels it is possible that gays are “born that way”. Nobody ever dares to ask if adulterers, child molesters, beast lovers, idolaters, thieves, the covetous, drunkards, revilers, extortioners, sodomites, or other fornicators might be born with their sinful desires. But we’re supposed to see the nonproductive homosexual lifestyle as something that deserves special benefits from government. Since the Federal government imposed on states, via a US Supreme Court ruling (Lawrence vs. Texas), that states can’t uphold morality under their laws, gays can have whatever ceremonies they wish. That does not mean any government should have to offer that any form of recognition. Edwards is OK with government sanctioned “gay civil unions”. The gay lifestyle is historically non-productive, unlike marriage, which Jesus explained in the following manner.

When John Edwards claims he does not wish to impose his beliefs on someone regarding marriage, he goes against historical precedent. The state of Utah was not allowed into the Union until they gave up polygamy. The Federal government imposed a decent form of order regarding marriage. It has been at the core of what makes a state part of the USA. Now Edwards claims this would be a problem. And that means far more than just gays would have their way with our government. A vote for Edwards is a vote for moral decay!

Edwards would allow people to be openly gay in our military. There goes the neighborhood!

MR. RUSSERT: Do you believe that openly gay men and women should be able to serve in the military.

SEN. EDWARDS: Yes.

MR. RUSSERT: And you would do that as president?

SEN. EDWARDS: Absolutely.

Hear it from Edwards using the audio link below. The clip starts with him talking about Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Also, check out Hot Air’s coverage of John Edwards’ new blogmaster. Total insanity!

John Edwards talks about Iran and gays on NBC’s Meet the Press - MP3 Audio (Size: 1.39 MB)
(If linking, please link to this post, not the media file. For the sake of bandwidth there will be no other formats made.)

update 2/5/2007 12:08PM: Looks like Edwards’ new blogger is trying to clean up old posts.

Well just when I thought Insight Magazine might have been counted out regarding this story of Barack Hussein Obama having been a Muslim, they come back with more information that even Obama’s camp has to acknowledge actually is on record. Although they still deny Obama was ever a Muslim, but this information from another school in Indonesia records Obama was a Muslim.

Insight Magazine’s Editor Jeffrey T. Kuhner was on Sean Hannity’s radio program yesterday. And he had PLENTY to say. He is standing firm, that the Hillary camp found the information and was going to pump it to the media when they were ready. About 7-8 months from now and they are upset Insight broke the story. He claims to have “multiple sources from the Hillary camp”. Mr. Kuhner says Hillary is petrified of Obama. In part because she feels he has traction with the anti-war crowd.

Kuhner said when he contacted team Obama for comment, not only did they not have a comment, but Obama’s people were not ready to handle this. He says they were stunned and he feels that they are not ready for “prime time”. Mr. Kuhner also said that he feels they know the “Muslim issue” is something they can be hurt on.

Insight will have a follow up story. They feel they can reliably say “it seems that Obama has been downplaying his Muslim background” and that Obama was raised to some degree as a Muslim.

One piece of proof they have has already been reported in the MSM. When Obama first started school in Indonesia at a Catholic school, he was registered at that school as a Muslim. All students has to declare their faith and he was on record as a Muslim.

Now watch the spin move from Team Obama:

…
Obama’s mother, divorced from Obama’s father, married a man from Indonesia named Lolo Soetoro, and the family relocated to the country from 1967-71. At first, Obama attended the Catholic school, Fransiskus Assisis, where documents showed he enrolled as a Muslim, the religion of his stepfather.

The document required that each student choose one of five state-sanctioned religions when registering _ Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, Catholic or Protestant. Gibbs said he wasn’t sure why the document had Obama listed as a Muslim.

“Senator Obama has never been a Muslim,” Gibbs said. “As a six-year-old in Catholic school, he studied the catechism.”
…

Well with that folks, I think Barack Hussein Obama is a liar. He’s had his team issue a statement that he was never a Muslim, but there is well documented proof that he entered school as a Muslim. Also Mr. Kuhner noted, that Barack Hussein was given a traditional Muslim name and Muslim fathers declare their children to be Muslim at birth. So this brings back that whole matter of him possibly being called an apostate from Islam, by those who practice “pure Islam”. Which would mean they would seek to have him killed. You can’t exactly mediate the Middle East crisis when one side has yet another reason to want you dead.

Regarding Obama’s claims of the Christian faith, Jeff at RightFaith has found that Obama really does not know where he stands. I can tell you for a fact, that his claims of the term “evangelical” somehow being “blurred” at “traditional Black churches” is bogus. He just said that to a person he knew had no knowledge of Black churches to shut them down. I’ve only been in churches surrounded by Black people my entire life. And I recall when devout Christians were called “fundamentalist”, now the term used by the media has changed to “evangelical”. Given today’s Liberals dislike Christians who actually evangelize, seek to bring converts to our faith and tell groups like the pro-choice crowd that they need to stop doing something that is sinful. Throughout all the name changes, regardless the race, devout Christians know who the media is talking about, because they know where they stand regarding their faith and values. I recall when I was young, an unsaved friend of mine addressed me as a Christian fundamentalist, because that’s the term that was used in those days. Now how could 2 young Black kids understand such a basic term, but Obama claims it’s blurred at Black churches? Don’t believe him.

And Obama is “not sure” about some passages in the Bible. I sure would like to know exactly which passages he might take issue with.

Given Obama’s waffling, I can’t help but wonder if his claim to Christianity is simply politically motivated. It’s not like he would be unique, but just another lying politician that plays on faith for votes.

Hear audio clips of Kuhner and Hannity using the link below.
Insight Magazine’s Jeffrey T. Kuhner and Sean Hannity talk about Obama and Hillary - MP3 Audio (Size: 2.89 MB)
(If linking, please link to this post, not the media file. For the sake of bandwidth there will be no other formats made.)

So Republicans are pretty upset that Wolf Blitzer asked Vice President Dick Cheney about his lesbian daughter getting herself pregnant, to intentionally raise a child in a gay household. See the video of Blitzer asking the question over at Hot Air, where Republicans are having a tizzy.

Well I don’t have a problem with Wolf asking the question. I do feel Wolf should have left it alone after Dick Cheney said “no”, but it’s a more than reasonable question. Considering the Republican Party tries to claim to be a party of faith and values. They ensure that their campaigning targets Christians and our concerns. Not to mention they play up some issues to get our support. When such a group is courting Christians, while their own leaders are not reflecting our values in their own lives, that’s a question worthy of the media bringing up. Dick Cheney is a VERY high ranking member in the party, as US Vice President. His daughter who is doing this is a major campaigner for their party.

Also, when Liberals are asked personal questions by the media, the people upset now have nothing to say. I’ve mentioned how Barack Hussein Obama was basically asked if he was a hypocrite for sending his kids to private school, while being against school vouchers (school choice). I feel that question was perfectly reasonable, although it involved Obama’s own kids and when Liberals are hit with personal questions nobody outside of the Democratic party complains. Anyone can choose not to answer a question, however I don’t fault a member of the media for asking personal questions when they relate to politics and policy.

This is not the same as a member of the US Senate playing on someone’s personal life in an effort to humiliate them.

Conservatives and Republicans had no problem when former Vice President Dan Quayle lashed out at the TV Show Murphy Brown, for showing a woman intentionally taking action to raise a baby without a husband. When Republicans attack others for raising children out of wedlock all the Conservatives and Republicans are happy. But when a Republican is asked about their own family conflict in this area there is wailing from Republicans.

I feel this is yet another example of what separates Republicans from Independent Conservatives like myself. While we Independent Conservatives often find issues in common with Republicans, we ICs are not going to play double standards on issues like this.

So in my efforts to express my concerns about this double standard, I called the Kevin Miller morning show to explain my thoughts. I am glad I was given the opportunity to share my thoughts there. I recorded the call and you can check it out.

Hear it using the audio link below.
Me calling Kevin Miller about Wolf Blitzer and Dick Cheney - MP3 Audio (Size: 647 KB)
(If linking, please link to this post, not the media file. For the sake of bandwidth there will be no other formats made.)

update 1/25/2007 12:24PM: Greg over at The Political Pit Bull agrees that the question its self was not out of line, although he understands why it might tick Dick off.