Rekjalhew

September 30, 2008

I Might Be Against A Ron Paul Presidency, But You Better Listen To The Man When He’s Talking About The US Economy.

by @ 12:55 am. Filed under Business

I mean, this is the stuff I’ve been talking about, so I have to say when the man is right he’s right.




Ron Paul blasts bailouts 9-19-20 ‘the unconstitutional government- proposal’

Failures have to be allowed to fail, not be propped up with magic money.

Congressman Paul was also on the CNN morning show last Friday. I don’t have video, but please read this short transcript of the interview.

CNN interview With Ron Paul about economic bailout proposal.

Now, one House Republican says that the government is trying to fix a problem that government created using the same ideas that actually created it. OK. He is not just any House Republican. He’s Ron Paul, congressman from Texas, former candidate for president, and a giant among supporters of limited government.

Congressman, good to see you.

REP. RON PAUL (R), TEXAS: Thank you. Nice to be with you.

PHILLIPS: Boy, a lot of drama going on, wouldn’t you say?

PAUL: Oh, yes, a lot of excitement. I wish it weren’t so serious and we could have a little bit of fun, but it is very serious. There’s no doubt about it.

PHILLIPS: Definitely. And my question to you is, this bailout plan, I mean, should the government even be stepping in? Is it lawmakers’ responsibility to bear the brunt of this?

PAUL: Oh, no, it isn’t. There’s a responsibility of government when there are problems like this. Sort of like after Enron, there was a responsibility, but the responsibility was assumed by the state of Texas. A lot of fraud went on, and the people who committed fraud ended up in jail. And the market dealt with the rest.

The company was essentially bankrupt. They had dealt with derivatives. And the company went bankrupt and the stock went to zero. So that’s a good way to handle it.

And Lehman Brothers was handled the same way, and there’s still some products left in Lehman Brothers. And it’s going to be bought up by stronger hands. That is the important thing, that the liquidation of that investment, bad debt, gets over with. The quicker, the better.

But when people make mistakes, it’s not the responsibility of the government to go in and buy these assets that have no value. But the mistakes were made because of so many contributing factors by the government, and particularly the Federal Reserve system.

PHILLIPS: Well, let’s talk about who really is at fault here. I mean, I had and a chance to interview an FBI investigator yesterday. His job basically is to investigate corruption on Wall Street. And he said look, there is no simply no oversight.

The SEC is not doing its job. Other commissions are not doing the jobs. Because when it comes to these high-powered companies, high-paid CEOs, and lots of money, that they are the ones giving big donations to the individuals that are supposed to be keeping an eye on them. And they just don’t want to touch it.

PAUL: Well, it shows that the system doesn’t work. So basically, the preemptive strike of a regulator essentially never works. It didn’t work to protect us against Enron, but the laws against corruption did work. I mean, they committed fraud and they were convicted.

So, I’m not a regulator. I’m a regulator due to the market, but not by bureaucrats who can be bought off.

PHILLIPS: So, Congressman, what do we do? If the answer isn’t regulators, how do you prevent this type of fraud and corruption, and an economic meltdown like the one we are seeing now where taxpayers are suffering tremendously?

PAUL: Well, they haven’t yet. They only suffer because the government has been too much involved in devaluing their currency, and now they want to devalue their currency more. So the most important thing is not to stick it on the taxpayer.

What we want to do is to get out of the way and let the liquidation of debt occur. We are unfortunately doing the bad things we did in the early 1930s. We wouldn’t allow the market to adjust.

Prior to that, we had recessions, but they were never long lasting. Now, since we’ve adopted this principle of regulation and trying to patch together inflated bubbles, it doesn’t work. It just prolongs the agony, and this is what we’re doing now. Instead of a quick correction, what we are going to do is have a situation that’s going to last not a year, but maybe a whole decade.

PHILLIPS: Real quickly, will we see a bailout plan signed off on before the next president takes office? What do you think?

PAUL: Yes, I’m pretty pessimistic, so I would say they’re going to pass it. Yes, they’re going to pass it. They’ve already spent $700 billion, and that’s a drop in the bucket. And they want another $700 billion.

They originally asked that it not be reviewed by any court. They’re very, very bold, and they’re socializing this nation and bankrupted this nation. They’re going to destroy the dollar before it’s all over if we don’t take this in hand.

PHILLIPS: Congressman Ron Paul.

Always interesting to talk to you, sir. Appreciate it.

PAUL: Thank you.

Now this really is all about temporal money. No amount of money can save your soul. Eternal security comes in knowing Jesus Christ and believing on Him alone for salvation. But it’s interesting watching things transpire and a nation dig a economic hole for its self.

The politicians are going to continue trying to press for the bailout bill until they get it.



2 Responses to “I Might Be Against A Ron Paul Presidency, But You Better Listen To The Man When He’s Talking About The US Economy.”

  1. healtheland Says:

    If he hadn’t rejected the Bible on homosexuality, I would still support him.

    IndependentConservative reply on September 30th, 2008 at 10:19 am :

    Well, for me it was a bit more than just that. There were also issues like this and this too.

    Still, on this matter of the economy, the running candidates could take a lesson from him.

Independent Conservative - Copyright 2008 - Copyright Notice

[powered by WordPress.]

49 queries. 0.735 seconds