Walter Kambulow doesn’t slander or gossip about people. He tells the truth about wolves in sheep’s clothing and money changers in the house of God.

Gossip is defined as 1. Rumor or talk of a personal, sensational, or intimate nature. 2. A person who habitually spreads intimate or private rumors or facts. 3. Trivial, chatty talk or writing.

There is nothing trivial or chatty talk about Pastors John Arnott and Steve Long being proven liars, thieves and perjurers.

And the bible is very clear about having an awareness ministry and exposing things like Jesus and Apostle Paul did:

MT 16:6 Then Jesus said to them, “Take heed and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and the Sadducees.”

EPH 5:11 And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them. 5:12 For it is shameful even to speak of those things which are done by them in secret.
5:13 But all things that are exposed are made manifest by the light, for whatever makes manifest is light. 5:14 Therefore He says: “Awake, you who sleep, Arise from the dead,
And Christ will give you light.”

And Apostle John the Apostle of love didn’t have a problem writing about wayward leadership to others and he wrote:

3 John 1:9 I wrote to the church, but Diotrephes, who loves to have the preeminence among them, does not receive us. 1:10 Therefore, if I come, I will call to mind his deeds which he does, prating against us with malicious words. And not content with that, he himself does not receive the brethren, and forbids those who wish to, putting them out of the church.

And Apostle Paul not only cursed twice those who were preaching another GAL 1:8 But even if we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel to you than what we have preached to you, let him be accursed.gospel but said some people’s mouths must be stopped as they are liars and evil beasts:

Titus 1:10 For there are many insubordinate, both idle talkers and deceivers, especially those of the circumcision, 1:11 whose mouths must be stopped, who subvert whole households, teaching things which they ought not, for the sake of dishonest gain. 1:12 One of them, a prophet of their own, said, “Cretans are always liars, evil beasts, lazy gluttons.” 1:13 This testimony is true. Therefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith, 1:14 not giving heed to Jewish fables and commandments of men who turn from the truth.

And wise King Solomon told us:

Eccl. 3:1 To everything there is a season, A time for every purpose under heaven:
3:2 A time to be born, And a time to die; A time to plant, And a time to pluck what is planted;
3:3 A time to kill, And a time to heal; A time to break down, And a time to build up;
3:7 A time to tear, And a time to sew; A time to keep silence, And a time to speak; 3:8 A time to love, And a time to hate; A time of war, And a time of peace.

So there is a time to break down, to kill, to hate and a time of war?

Proverbs 20:19 (New American Standard Bible)

19 He who goes about as a slanderer reveals secrets,
Therefore do not associate with a gossip.

Have I told you anything here that is not already communicated to the world at large? No. Everything posted here is based on either public media reports, public records available online, personal testimony, or testimony of the actual witness(es). To warn saints of things to beware of. If you see a post where I got into secrets that are not known to the public, please point out those posts to me.

Use of words and tone. I feel very comfortable with the words I use and find the word “nuts” to be no different from the term “deluded” in scripture. I actually feel I’m a little too soft and need to more often speak of these pimps as the dogs eating their vomit that they really are, 2 Peter 2:22.

Please show me where I’ve called someone other than a person who denies there is a God a “fool”? I might say someone is “acting foolish” or that they are trying to “fool you” or “play you for a fool”, but usually I only actually address someone as a “fool” in post like this one: Don’t Be a Fool Like Albert Einstein.

A viper who is a false prophet is NOT a brother. So I don’t see how Matthew 5:22 would be applicable, even though I don’t call those pimping vipers who are no better than dogs who eat their own vomit “fools”.

So I find my terms and tone to be fine and not ungodly. Of course if you feel this blog is addressing things in an ungodly manner, it would be in your best interest not to read it. Given I have no intentions of altering tone and you’ve already asked me about the subject. I am not trying to disturb your sensibilities and if you feel this blog hinders your walk with Christ, I certainly understand if you no longer view it.

You may feel I’m addressing them from a point of anger, but that certainly is not the case. I forgave and the Lord took me beyond anger a long time ago, well before ever blogging about any of these things.

When you read 2 Peter 2 or 1 Timothy 6 or Matthew 23, do you find any issues with the tone and terms used to address false teachers?

TORONTO BLESSING http://cnt10a.tripod.com/tb.htm

Liars and Perjurers in Revival http://tbtacf.tripod.com/revival.pdf