<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alliance Defense Fund, Your Efforts to Have Pastors Intentionally Break the Law Brings Shame to the Body of Christ.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.independentconservative.com/2008/05/12/adf_advocates_law_breaking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.independentconservative.com/2008/05/12/adf_advocates_law_breaking/</link>
	<description>The Independent Conservative saying what needs to be said!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 21:35:55 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: GaryV</title>
		<link>http://www.independentconservative.com/2008/05/12/adf_advocates_law_breaking/comment-page-1/#comment-9981</link>
		<dc:creator>GaryV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 21:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentconservative.com/?p=1856#comment-9981</guid>
		<description>Why not just give up the 501C3?? You can&#039;t serve God and mammon, but they seem to want it both ways anyhow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not just give up the 501C3?? You can&#8217;t serve God and mammon, but they seem to want it both ways anyhow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IndependentConservative</title>
		<link>http://www.independentconservative.com/2008/05/12/adf_advocates_law_breaking/comment-page-1/#comment-9964</link>
		<dc:creator>IndependentConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 02:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentconservative.com/?p=1856#comment-9964</guid>
		<description>I think I better understand you now SJC.  Thank you for the follow up.

You have to first understand, that the entire IRS in and of its self is unconstitutional.

Here&#039;s a post and video to check out: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.independentconservative.com/2008/04/11/america-freedom-to-fascism/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;America: Freedom to Fascism, A Movie Worth Viewing.&lt;/a&gt;

So really the whole federal tax system violates the US Constitution when we want to be honest about it.  However, it is a law that we Christians must abide by just the same and pay our taxes.  The church is not called to battle with government over the tax laws of man.

&lt;em&gt;(I sometimes talk about taxation here, but it&#039;s my personal viewpoint in those posts.)&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I better understand you now SJC.  Thank you for the follow up.</p>
<p>You have to first understand, that the entire IRS in and of its self is unconstitutional.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a post and video to check out: <a href="http://www.independentconservative.com/2008/04/11/america-freedom-to-fascism/" rel="nofollow">America: Freedom to Fascism, A Movie Worth Viewing.</a></p>
<p>So really the whole federal tax system violates the US Constitution when we want to be honest about it.  However, it is a law that we Christians must abide by just the same and pay our taxes.  The church is not called to battle with government over the tax laws of man.</p>
<p><em>(I sometimes talk about taxation here, but it&#8217;s my personal viewpoint in those posts.)</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SJC</title>
		<link>http://www.independentconservative.com/2008/05/12/adf_advocates_law_breaking/comment-page-1/#comment-9963</link>
		<dc:creator>SJC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 01:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentconservative.com/?p=1856#comment-9963</guid>
		<description>I completely agree that if a church desires to go political, they should forgo their tax exempt status as required by the law. I would even go a step further and state that they should forgo calling themselves a church if Jesus isn&#039;t being declared out of the pulpit. However, it&#039;s aspects of that same law (IRS code enacted in 1954), that I was declaring to be unconstitutional and simply trying to say that ANY legislature (whether unconstitutional or not) can&#039;t be overturned by the courts unless it is preceded by a case that challenges said law.  
I hope I&#039;m making &quot;logical sense&quot; this time, because I think it&#039;s more a problem with my written communication skills :) 

To sum it up though, my point is/was this: &quot;according to the constitution,&quot; though the government may have a right to tax any organization they want, they have no right to dictate what a church preaches (I think that&#039;s what the ADF wants to challenge, though they should do it without asking pastors to use the pulpit as a means to do so).

So, bottom line, I agree with your comment about no politics behind the pulpit (which includes playing politics with lawyers), but have to disagree with any IRS code or other law that so plainly ignores the constitution. And in order to make these two opinions consistent, let me say that it&#039;s the Word of God that suggests what comes out of the pulpit, not the ADF or IRS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree that if a church desires to go political, they should forgo their tax exempt status as required by the law. I would even go a step further and state that they should forgo calling themselves a church if Jesus isn&#8217;t being declared out of the pulpit. However, it&#8217;s aspects of that same law (IRS code enacted in 1954), that I was declaring to be unconstitutional and simply trying to say that ANY legislature (whether unconstitutional or not) can&#8217;t be overturned by the courts unless it is preceded by a case that challenges said law.<br />
I hope I&#8217;m making &#8220;logical sense&#8221; this time, because I think it&#8217;s more a problem with my written communication skills <img src='http://www.independentconservative.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>To sum it up though, my point is/was this: &#8220;according to the constitution,&#8221; though the government may have a right to tax any organization they want, they have no right to dictate what a church preaches (I think that&#8217;s what the ADF wants to challenge, though they should do it without asking pastors to use the pulpit as a means to do so).</p>
<p>So, bottom line, I agree with your comment about no politics behind the pulpit (which includes playing politics with lawyers), but have to disagree with any IRS code or other law that so plainly ignores the constitution. And in order to make these two opinions consistent, let me say that it&#8217;s the Word of God that suggests what comes out of the pulpit, not the ADF or IRS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IndependentConservative</title>
		<link>http://www.independentconservative.com/2008/05/12/adf_advocates_law_breaking/comment-page-1/#comment-9961</link>
		<dc:creator>IndependentConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 23:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentconservative.com/?p=1856#comment-9961</guid>
		<description>SJC, you&#039;re not making any logical sense.

If a church assembly desires to go political, fine, they should forgo their tax exempt status.  There is nothing for them to &quot;challenge&quot; in court and nothing &quot;unconstitutional&quot; if they decide to go political.  They simply need to stop acting like they can avoid paying taxes AND play in politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SJC, you&#8217;re not making any logical sense.</p>
<p>If a church assembly desires to go political, fine, they should forgo their tax exempt status.  There is nothing for them to &#8220;challenge&#8221; in court and nothing &#8220;unconstitutional&#8221; if they decide to go political.  They simply need to stop acting like they can avoid paying taxes AND play in politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SJC</title>
		<link>http://www.independentconservative.com/2008/05/12/adf_advocates_law_breaking/comment-page-1/#comment-9960</link>
		<dc:creator>SJC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 22:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentconservative.com/?p=1856#comment-9960</guid>
		<description>Brilliant...the IRS agrees to keep the church separate by not collecting taxes, but then places unconstitutional restrictions on what a church can or cannot preach (even though the church should only preach Christ and His gospel alone). It&#039;s their way of keeping some semblance of control over the church. 

The real first ammendment restricts NO ONE from endorsing any candidate...the real first ammendment does restrict the Government from forcing one religion on everyone and from &quot;preventing the free exercise thereof.&quot; (still not promoting politics from the pulpit, just the right to preach without big brother dictating a pastor&#039;s outline).
Unfortunately, however, the only way to overturn a law known by everyone to be unconstitutional (i.e., IRS restrictions on the church, whether mutual agreement between the two or otherwise), is to have it challenged in court. 

Ahh, what a dilemma! I say let the government deal with their own politics and give Ceasar what is his, and give us Jesus! They will all bow the knee before the true King one day anyway, whether they like it or not :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant&#8230;the IRS agrees to keep the church separate by not collecting taxes, but then places unconstitutional restrictions on what a church can or cannot preach (even though the church should only preach Christ and His gospel alone). It&#8217;s their way of keeping some semblance of control over the church. </p>
<p>The real first ammendment restricts NO ONE from endorsing any candidate&#8230;the real first ammendment does restrict the Government from forcing one religion on everyone and from &#8220;preventing the free exercise thereof.&#8221; (still not promoting politics from the pulpit, just the right to preach without big brother dictating a pastor&#8217;s outline).<br />
Unfortunately, however, the only way to overturn a law known by everyone to be unconstitutional (i.e., IRS restrictions on the church, whether mutual agreement between the two or otherwise), is to have it challenged in court. </p>
<p>Ahh, what a dilemma! I say let the government deal with their own politics and give Ceasar what is his, and give us Jesus! They will all bow the knee before the true King one day anyway, whether they like it or not <img src='http://www.independentconservative.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: healtheland</title>
		<link>http://www.independentconservative.com/2008/05/12/adf_advocates_law_breaking/comment-page-1/#comment-9953</link>
		<dc:creator>healtheland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 00:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentconservative.com/?p=1856#comment-9953</guid>
		<description>IC:

It is all about the Roman Catholic Church&#039;s trying to destroy the barrier between church and state so that they can complete the process of bringing us under the Vatican. Evangelicals are just being used and deceived.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IC:</p>
<p>It is all about the Roman Catholic Church&#8217;s trying to destroy the barrier between church and state so that they can complete the process of bringing us under the Vatican. Evangelicals are just being used and deceived.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: speakingtruth</title>
		<link>http://www.independentconservative.com/2008/05/12/adf_advocates_law_breaking/comment-page-1/#comment-9943</link>
		<dc:creator>speakingtruth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 20:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentconservative.com/?p=1856#comment-9943</guid>
		<description>Excellent analysis &amp; stand, IC.

I agree 100% - these lawyers will trip overthemselves to represent pastors for defying a violation of non-profit tax code...but will they board a plane to represent our brothers and sisters to the evil governments that trample their ability to publicly proclaim the Name of Christ?

And if pastors &lt;i&gt;really&lt;/i&gt; believed the Gospel that they claim to preach, then they would stand flat-footed and declare the Word of the Lord instead of hiding behind their precious 5013-c status. 

I mean really, they preach about how God is going to &lt;i&gt;&quot;open up the windows of heaven and pour out a blessing&quot;&lt;/i&gt;, yet they really on the sheep to feed them - not Him! Then, they puff up all big and bad at the government (&lt;i&gt;i.e. &quot;the man&quot;) until they see that they might have to actually pay taxes, then the Gospel becomes an inconvenience.

What&#039;s next - an army of gay-friendly lawyers will encourage pastors to preach how much &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;Jesus loves gay people&lt;/i&gt; who remain in their sinful lifestyles, or they&#039;ll threaten to take away their tax exempt status?

It&#039;s detestable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent analysis &amp; stand, IC.</p>
<p>I agree 100% &#8211; these lawyers will trip overthemselves to represent pastors for defying a violation of non-profit tax code&#8230;but will they board a plane to represent our brothers and sisters to the evil governments that trample their ability to publicly proclaim the Name of Christ?</p>
<p>And if pastors <i>really</i> believed the Gospel that they claim to preach, then they would stand flat-footed and declare the Word of the Lord instead of hiding behind their precious 5013-c status. </p>
<p>I mean really, they preach about how God is going to <i>&#8220;open up the windows of heaven and pour out a blessing&#8221;</i>, yet they really on the sheep to feed them &#8211; not Him! Then, they puff up all big and bad at the government (<i>i.e. &#8220;the man&#8221;) until they see that they might have to actually pay taxes, then the Gospel becomes an inconvenience.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s next &#8211; an army of gay-friendly lawyers will encourage pastors to preach how much </i><i>Jesus loves gay people</i> who remain in their sinful lifestyles, or they&#8217;ll threaten to take away their tax exempt status?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s detestable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

