<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Truth About Peter and Roman Catholic Lies.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.independentconservative.com/2008/04/24/truth-about-peter-and-roman-catholic-lies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.independentconservative.com/2008/04/24/truth-about-peter-and-roman-catholic-lies/</link>
	<description>The Independent Conservative saying what needs to be said!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 21:35:55 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: IndependentConservative</title>
		<link>http://www.independentconservative.com/2008/04/24/truth-about-peter-and-roman-catholic-lies/comment-page-1/#comment-9769</link>
		<dc:creator>IndependentConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 02:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentconservative.com/?p=1835#comment-9769</guid>
		<description>Hi VanceR,

When it comes to the Roman Catholic &quot;art&quot;, the Babylon stuff that we&#039;ve seen throughout their history comes from the facts established that they are a cult of such things.  Although, some of the art that has some rather nasty things in it was sometimes placed there by the artist, who was ticked they had to service the Roman Catholics.  It was their means of rebellion to include subliminal images often of a perverse nature.  So some of it, the Babylon stuff is the intentional result of what Roman Catholicism is, but some of the more hidden images were sometimes added by an artist who was ticked they had to service the Roman Catholics.  Now the Roman Catholics are well aware of the perverse additions today, but still make use of some of it.

The 3 videos below feature some rather pornographic material.  But it shows what is in some of the Roman Catholic artwork. 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://youtube.com/watch?v=kX3qhqNaXHU&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pornographic Subliminal Roman Catholic Art - Part 1&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://youtube.com/watch?v=E_DZmsqZ_DM&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pornographic Subliminal Roman Catholic Art - Part 2&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://youtube.com/watch?v=cqS6ViiM_VM&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pornographic Subliminal Roman Catholic Art - Part 3&lt;/a&gt;

And some of it is so obvious, it shows that some of the mess was likely requested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi VanceR,</p>
<p>When it comes to the Roman Catholic &#8220;art&#8221;, the Babylon stuff that we&#8217;ve seen throughout their history comes from the facts established that they are a cult of such things.  Although, some of the art that has some rather nasty things in it was sometimes placed there by the artist, who was ticked they had to service the Roman Catholics.  It was their means of rebellion to include subliminal images often of a perverse nature.  So some of it, the Babylon stuff is the intentional result of what Roman Catholicism is, but some of the more hidden images were sometimes added by an artist who was ticked they had to service the Roman Catholics.  Now the Roman Catholics are well aware of the perverse additions today, but still make use of some of it.</p>
<p>The 3 videos below feature some rather pornographic material.  But it shows what is in some of the Roman Catholic artwork. </p>
<p><a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=kX3qhqNaXHU" rel="nofollow">Pornographic Subliminal Roman Catholic Art &#8211; Part 1</a></p>
<p><a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=E_DZmsqZ_DM" rel="nofollow">Pornographic Subliminal Roman Catholic Art &#8211; Part 2</a></p>
<p><a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=cqS6ViiM_VM" rel="nofollow">Pornographic Subliminal Roman Catholic Art &#8211; Part 3</a></p>
<p>And some of it is so obvious, it shows that some of the mess was likely requested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VanceR</title>
		<link>http://www.independentconservative.com/2008/04/24/truth-about-peter-and-roman-catholic-lies/comment-page-1/#comment-9768</link>
		<dc:creator>VanceR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 01:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentconservative.com/?p=1835#comment-9768</guid>
		<description>Great article.  I didn&#039;t realize that Simon the Magus was the &quot;Peter&quot; of the Roman Catholic Church.  Anyway, I have the book &quot;The Two Babylons&quot; by Hilsop that highlights a lot of parallels between Babylon and the Roman Catholic church.
There&#039;s pagan symbolism in the &quot;haloes&quot; or sun bursts around the heads of the &quot;saints&quot; in most of Roman Catholic art.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article.  I didn&#8217;t realize that Simon the Magus was the &#8220;Peter&#8221; of the Roman Catholic Church.  Anyway, I have the book &#8220;The Two Babylons&#8221; by Hilsop that highlights a lot of parallels between Babylon and the Roman Catholic church.<br />
There&#8217;s pagan symbolism in the &#8220;haloes&#8221; or sun bursts around the heads of the &#8220;saints&#8221; in most of Roman Catholic art.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IndependentConservative</title>
		<link>http://www.independentconservative.com/2008/04/24/truth-about-peter-and-roman-catholic-lies/comment-page-1/#comment-9747</link>
		<dc:creator>IndependentConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 02:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentconservative.com/?p=1835#comment-9747</guid>
		<description>Here are two write-ups.  Each gives a different view on where Peter might have died.  But even the one that notes Peter as having spent time in Rome affirms the Peter of Roman Catholicism is NOT the Apostle Peter, but Simon Magus.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/03/23/wrome123.xml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;St Peter was not the first Pope and never went to Rome, claims Channel 4&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hope-of-israel.org/petrome.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;DID THE APOSTLE PETER EVER VISIT ROME?&lt;/a&gt;

The heavy Babylonian cult influence seen in the symbols and &quot;traditions&quot; of Roman Catholicism pretty much give it away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are two write-ups.  Each gives a different view on where Peter might have died.  But even the one that notes Peter as having spent time in Rome affirms the Peter of Roman Catholicism is NOT the Apostle Peter, but Simon Magus.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/03/23/wrome123.xml" rel="nofollow">St Peter was not the first Pope and never went to Rome, claims Channel 4</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.hope-of-israel.org/petrome.htm" rel="nofollow">DID THE APOSTLE PETER EVER VISIT ROME?</a></p>
<p>The heavy Babylonian cult influence seen in the symbols and &#8220;traditions&#8221; of Roman Catholicism pretty much give it away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteelGator</title>
		<link>http://www.independentconservative.com/2008/04/24/truth-about-peter-and-roman-catholic-lies/comment-page-1/#comment-9745</link>
		<dc:creator>SteelGator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentconservative.com/?p=1835#comment-9745</guid>
		<description>Very interesting information.  I never knew that the real Simon of the Catholic church was a heathen and not the Disciple Peter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting information.  I never knew that the real Simon of the Catholic church was a heathen and not the Disciple Peter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

