mfcheyenne came to defend Huck and his pals are in other places sticking up for that pimp. The truth was offered in every link of the post.

Another point is that Mother Teresa did great works as well. She could run circles around Larry. However, those great works will not get her into heaven either. If Mother Teresa did not know Jesus as her personal Lord and Savior, she will be damned to hell.

I think calling him a pimp might be calling one of God’s servants a sin.

He’s a pimp and you’re a defender of an anti-Christ pimp! Which makes YOU an anti-Christ disciple!

But about the man, has started many churches, some with financial support, some without, did missionary work in Australia, moving his family with no real certainty of financial security, many times, and many years over. Was kicked out of fundamentalist denomination for his loyalty to his worthwhile friends, leaving his future preaching and church support in doubt. Starting several churches, then giving them to others, and starting over. Given mountains of money, time, love and counseling and things I don’t even know about to people. Given millions of dollars to overseas and missionaries as well as helped personal friends during times of trajedy. He has been married to one woman,

SO WHAT!

and lives a holy life.

No he does not, he blasphemes and you defend him.

Hoping that showing us his works will help us overlook his denial of THE TRUTH.

And has always been a very hard worker. Some of the people who are saying a disparaging remark about this man, can’t hold a candle to his work ethic or the impact he has had on helping people in third world countries and in the US.

Here’s my message to both him and you for your defending that vile profiteering pulpit pimp! He lies and fleeces saints while you come here to display his works that in the eyes of God are nothing more than filthy rags, Isaiah 64:6, denying Christ as the ONLY BEGOTTEN SON OF GOD. You even act like his heresy of prosperity doctrine has a level of credibility when it does not.

Matthew 7:13-23 (New American Standard Bible)

13 “Enter through the narrow gate; for the gate is wide and the way is broad that leads to destruction, and there are many who enter through it.

14 “For the gate is small and the way is narrow that leads to life, and there are few who find it.

15 “Beware of the false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly are ravenous wolves.

16 “You will know them by their fruits. Grapes are not gathered from thorn bushes nor figs from thistles, are they?

17 “So every good tree bears good fruit, but the bad tree bears bad fruit.

18 “A good tree cannot produce bad fruit, nor can a bad tree produce good fruit.

19 “Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire.

20 “So then, you will know them by their fruits.

21 “Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father who is in heaven will enter.

22 “Many will say to Me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in Your name, and in Your name cast out demons, and in Your name perform many miracles?’

23 “And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; DEPART FROM ME, YOU WHO PRACTICE LAWLESSNESS.’

I don’t care HOW MANY things you tell me Larry Huck has done, he’s denied the truth and makes merchandise of his false teachings.

And to your last statement:

Find out a person’s background and journey to where they are before you so easily dispatch a criticism upon people who have worked very hard to love and help people.

You feel WORKS are going to save Larry Huck, they won’t. He’s departed the truth of THE FAITH. And you defend him.

You’re so vile yourself for defending or even trying to go easy on such rubbish, for what, a moment to have coffee with him and let him tell you about his works?

mfcheyenne I would not dare allow someone of your ilk to spend another moment speaking on my blog. You’re banned NOW.

Any thoughts?

Questioner

In your message, you had referenced several times—this “transdispensationalized” idea, and who are its proponents? And does this kind of inclusivism mean that someone has abandoned the gospel?

John MacArthur’s Answer

Yes, the question about—I did make reference to the phrase, “transdispensationalism,” almost sort of throwing it away; at the same time, I know it provoked some discussion and thought. It is a term that, to my knowledge, has only been used by one person, and that person is Tony Evans in a book entitled Totally Saved. That book came out, I think, in the year 2002; it was published by Moody Press. It is a book that endeavors to give a very, very simple and basic understanding of salvation.

At the end of the book, there is a chapter in which the question comes up about people who have never heard the gospel. And, in that section, Tony writes that people who never hear the gospel, if they will accept whatever light they have, God will acknowledge that as sufficient for their salvation. That, in itself, is a—that is a departure from historic Christian gospel. We would say that if someone lives up to the light they have, then the Lord, who is not limited in His capacity to deliver the truth, will bring the full light—and that no one could ever be saved apart from Christ.
…

People are denying the truth of John 10. All the sheep will accept CHRIST. That is who our Lord laid His life down for and all sheep will hear His voice and follow Him, not some “light” they don’t know the source of.

Satan fronts as an angel of light, 2 Corinthians 11:14. The cult of Baal is being promoted, it’s a false light. Sadly Tony and others are pushing the false light.

I sincere believe that pimps like Hoch and White and they’re ilk are so DRUNK with the wealth that they gain from spewing this heresy that they believe WHATEVER COMES FROM THEIR OWN MOUTHS!

This video should be required viewing for anyone who sits under a pimp, ever sent $1 to a pimp, or have any regard for one of these vile demonic pimps.

Are they trying to go to hell right now, instead of later?