<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ron Paul, Bringing the Wrong Kinds of People Together in His Name.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/12/31/ron_paul_supporters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/12/31/ron_paul_supporters/</link>
	<description>The Independent Conservative saying what needs to be said!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 21:35:55 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SteelGator</title>
		<link>http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/12/31/ron_paul_supporters/comment-page-1/#comment-8297</link>
		<dc:creator>SteelGator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 20:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/12/31/ron_paul_supporters/#comment-8297</guid>
		<description>IC....so true my friend.  I don&#039;t know if you have heard of Chuck Baldwin?  He is an independent Baptist preacher that is a BIG Ron Paul supporter.  He swears up and down that Ron Paul is a born again Christian, but I have never see Ron Paul talk about his salvation.  I also know Rev. Baldwin is a conspiracy junkie.  He is like Chicken Little running around saying the &quot;sky is falling...the sky is falling&quot;.  Anyway, Chuck and Ron Paul are both 9/11 deniers.  They don&#039;t think there is a real threat of Islamofacists that want to wipe the U.S., Israel and rest of the so called &quot;infidels&quot; off the map.  There were those that wanted to appease Hitler and we see where that got them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IC&#8230;.so true my friend.  I don&#8217;t know if you have heard of Chuck Baldwin?  He is an independent Baptist preacher that is a BIG Ron Paul supporter.  He swears up and down that Ron Paul is a born again Christian, but I have never see Ron Paul talk about his salvation.  I also know Rev. Baldwin is a conspiracy junkie.  He is like Chicken Little running around saying the &#8220;sky is falling&#8230;the sky is falling&#8221;.  Anyway, Chuck and Ron Paul are both 9/11 deniers.  They don&#8217;t think there is a real threat of Islamofacists that want to wipe the U.S., Israel and rest of the so called &#8220;infidels&#8221; off the map.  There were those that wanted to appease Hitler and we see where that got them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IndependentConservative</title>
		<link>http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/12/31/ron_paul_supporters/comment-page-1/#comment-8032</link>
		<dc:creator>IndependentConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/12/31/ron_paul_supporters/#comment-8032</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.independentconservative.com/2008/01/11/ron_paul_racist/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Now We Know Why White Supremacists Support Ron Paul. They Must Read His Newsletters!&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.independentconservative.com/2008/01/11/ron_paul_racist/" rel="nofollow">Now We Know Why White Supremacists Support Ron Paul. They Must Read His Newsletters!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IndependentConservative</title>
		<link>http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/12/31/ron_paul_supporters/comment-page-1/#comment-7971</link>
		<dc:creator>IndependentConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 17:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/12/31/ron_paul_supporters/#comment-7971</guid>
		<description>Also Ken, no matter what is in the US Constitution, you&#039;ll have to answer to a much higher authority about the things you know are sinful, you could have helped prevent and allow to advance.  Saying you&#039;ll just handle it in your own state is kind of like asking God if you are your brother&#039;s keeper.

Certain things are instituted to maintain good civil order and allowing abomination is only going to promote disorder.

What Ron Paul is brining people together for certainly is not the cause of Christ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also Ken, no matter what is in the US Constitution, you&#8217;ll have to answer to a much higher authority about the things you know are sinful, you could have helped prevent and allow to advance.  Saying you&#8217;ll just handle it in your own state is kind of like asking God if you are your brother&#8217;s keeper.</p>
<p>Certain things are instituted to maintain good civil order and allowing abomination is only going to promote disorder.</p>
<p>What Ron Paul is brining people together for certainly is not the cause of Christ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IndependentConservative</title>
		<link>http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/12/31/ron_paul_supporters/comment-page-1/#comment-7970</link>
		<dc:creator>IndependentConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 17:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/12/31/ron_paul_supporters/#comment-7970</guid>
		<description>Ken, you like others behind Ron Paul are under the misguided impression, that you&#039;re upholding the constitution when you advance a candidate who allows something like homosexuals to call themselves &quot;married&quot;.  You feel if states get to decide, that&#039;s somehow the &quot;American&quot; thing to do.  History is NOT on your side.  For the state of Utah to even be allowed into the Union, they had to submit to a mandate from the federal government to ban polygamy.  So the federal government preventing homosexuals from advancing their cause would be in line with guidelines even Utah had to follow to be a member.  Utah had to submit to one man and one woman in marriage and homosexuals being allowed is the most unnatural of things to consider.

The very things Ron Paul endorses in allowing the homosexual agenda to advance, hard dope advancing and prostitution advancement are things that are VOTED DOWN across the nation.

Ron Paul upholds a delusion, that is best seen in places such as Las Vegas, can you say &quot;sin city&quot;.  We don&#039;t need the whole nation going further in the wrong direction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken, you like others behind Ron Paul are under the misguided impression, that you&#8217;re upholding the constitution when you advance a candidate who allows something like homosexuals to call themselves &#8220;married&#8221;.  You feel if states get to decide, that&#8217;s somehow the &#8220;American&#8221; thing to do.  History is NOT on your side.  For the state of Utah to even be allowed into the Union, they had to submit to a mandate from the federal government to ban polygamy.  So the federal government preventing homosexuals from advancing their cause would be in line with guidelines even Utah had to follow to be a member.  Utah had to submit to one man and one woman in marriage and homosexuals being allowed is the most unnatural of things to consider.</p>
<p>The very things Ron Paul endorses in allowing the homosexual agenda to advance, hard dope advancing and prostitution advancement are things that are VOTED DOWN across the nation.</p>
<p>Ron Paul upholds a delusion, that is best seen in places such as Las Vegas, can you say &#8220;sin city&#8221;.  We don&#8217;t need the whole nation going further in the wrong direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ken</title>
		<link>http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/12/31/ron_paul_supporters/comment-page-1/#comment-7966</link>
		<dc:creator>ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 09:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/12/31/ron_paul_supporters/#comment-7966</guid>
		<description>Ron Paul endorses homosexuals being called “married”, endorses legalized prostitution and endorses legalized dope

Usually your comments relate to the video being presented, but in this case I find your analysis misguided. What Ron Paul is endorsing is simply federalism--different levels of government determine different laws--and libertarianism--the primary role of the government is to protect the rights of individuals, not to determine group standards.

Concerning your list: the same list of people (or variations thereof, with additions and subtractions peculiar to each) could be said to be behind every other candidate. Paul went out of his way to say that he finds many activities &quot;repugnant,&quot; and &quot;tragic.&quot;

As far as Stormfront goes, their attempts at fund-raising will operate just as the previous major fund-raising events for Paul--independently (no outside help or suggestion). If white supremacists think that Paul will advance their cause of intolerant segregation, that is there delusion. Paul&#039;s long history in the House shows that his influence can&#039;t be bought.

Paul may be a radically -different- candidate in terms of style and policy platform, but those facts in themselves do not necessitate the label of &quot;nutjob&quot; or the implication that he says what he does in order to garner a broader base of support. Ron Paul doesn&#039;t bring people together &quot;in his name,&quot; he brings people together in a common political cause. As an evangelical Christian I have just as much to gain from a protection of my 1st Amendment rights as does a blaspheming atheist. It is often the case in history that disparate groups of people benefit from sound policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron Paul endorses homosexuals being called “married”, endorses legalized prostitution and endorses legalized dope</p>
<p>Usually your comments relate to the video being presented, but in this case I find your analysis misguided. What Ron Paul is endorsing is simply federalism&#8211;different levels of government determine different laws&#8211;and libertarianism&#8211;the primary role of the government is to protect the rights of individuals, not to determine group standards.</p>
<p>Concerning your list: the same list of people (or variations thereof, with additions and subtractions peculiar to each) could be said to be behind every other candidate. Paul went out of his way to say that he finds many activities &#8220;repugnant,&#8221; and &#8220;tragic.&#8221;</p>
<p>As far as Stormfront goes, their attempts at fund-raising will operate just as the previous major fund-raising events for Paul&#8211;independently (no outside help or suggestion). If white supremacists think that Paul will advance their cause of intolerant segregation, that is there delusion. Paul&#8217;s long history in the House shows that his influence can&#8217;t be bought.</p>
<p>Paul may be a radically -different- candidate in terms of style and policy platform, but those facts in themselves do not necessitate the label of &#8220;nutjob&#8221; or the implication that he says what he does in order to garner a broader base of support. Ron Paul doesn&#8217;t bring people together &#8220;in his name,&#8221; he brings people together in a common political cause. As an evangelical Christian I have just as much to gain from a protection of my 1st Amendment rights as does a blaspheming atheist. It is often the case in history that disparate groups of people benefit from sound policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oct31st1517</title>
		<link>http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/12/31/ron_paul_supporters/comment-page-1/#comment-7961</link>
		<dc:creator>oct31st1517</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 15:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/12/31/ron_paul_supporters/#comment-7961</guid>
		<description>And I was asked by a friend who is a christian to vote for this nutjob? Thanks IC for making this video available. I need to show him this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I was asked by a friend who is a christian to vote for this nutjob? Thanks IC for making this video available. I need to show him this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

