<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Juanita Bynum Refiles for Divorce From Thomas Weeks III.  The Gospel of &#8220;Me&#8221; Continues! (Video)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/09/29/bynum_refiles_for_divorce/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/09/29/bynum_refiles_for_divorce/</link>
	<description>The Independent Conservative saying what needs to be said!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 18:27:23 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: IndependentConservative</title>
		<link>http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/09/29/bynum_refiles_for_divorce/comment-page-1/#comment-6224</link>
		<dc:creator>IndependentConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 15:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/09/29/bynum_refiles_for_divorce/#comment-6224</guid>
		<description>Bynum will reap what she sows.  But that does not mean the reaping will have to come in this life of flesh.  Although it&#039;s better to suffer the loss here, repent and gain reward with the Lord.  Bynum might leave the flesh with the world thinking she&#039;s a &quot;queen&quot; and reap later with the damned.

I&#039;ll keep saying, her and Weeks are on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=II%20Peter%202&amp;version=50&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;2 Peter 2&lt;/a&gt; street and need a detour to the Lord Jesus Christ in truth!

Bynum honestly is not a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=prov%2031;&amp;version=50;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Proverbs 31&lt;/a&gt; woman, but she certainly is expressing the evil noted in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=ps%2010;&amp;version=50;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Psalm 10&lt;/a&gt; and will receive an unwelcome reward if she does not repent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bynum will reap what she sows.  But that does not mean the reaping will have to come in this life of flesh.  Although it&#8217;s better to suffer the loss here, repent and gain reward with the Lord.  Bynum might leave the flesh with the world thinking she&#8217;s a &#8220;queen&#8221; and reap later with the damned.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll keep saying, her and Weeks are on <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=II%20Peter%202&amp;version=50" rel="nofollow">2 Peter 2</a> street and need a detour to the Lord Jesus Christ in truth!</p>
<p>Bynum honestly is not a <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=prov%2031;&amp;version=50;" rel="nofollow">Proverbs 31</a> woman, but she certainly is expressing the evil noted in <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=ps%2010;&amp;version=50;" rel="nofollow">Psalm 10</a> and will receive an unwelcome reward if she does not repent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lennie</title>
		<link>http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/09/29/bynum_refiles_for_divorce/comment-page-1/#comment-6221</link>
		<dc:creator>Lennie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 10:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/09/29/bynum_refiles_for_divorce/#comment-6221</guid>
		<description>...Now, back to the topic at hand.

Bynum reached a point where she saw Weeks as a pair of stockings to be disgarded. She was sick of him for a variety of reasons and he was disposable.

That marriage has been peculiar for a long time now. I remember wondering why she was traveling all over the world like a single woman, leaving him behind as she continued to reach for more speaking engagements, etc.

The beating is the excuse she is using to do what she has been aching to do anyway. Remember that she made no major purchases with him. That&#039;s why he is in debt while she is living like a queen.

God is going to make a major move, watch. I&#039;m just waiting b/c you reap what you sow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;Now, back to the topic at hand.</p>
<p>Bynum reached a point where she saw Weeks as a pair of stockings to be disgarded. She was sick of him for a variety of reasons and he was disposable.</p>
<p>That marriage has been peculiar for a long time now. I remember wondering why she was traveling all over the world like a single woman, leaving him behind as she continued to reach for more speaking engagements, etc.</p>
<p>The beating is the excuse she is using to do what she has been aching to do anyway. Remember that she made no major purchases with him. That&#8217;s why he is in debt while she is living like a queen.</p>
<p>God is going to make a major move, watch. I&#8217;m just waiting b/c you reap what you sow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lennie</title>
		<link>http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/09/29/bynum_refiles_for_divorce/comment-page-1/#comment-6220</link>
		<dc:creator>Lennie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 10:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/09/29/bynum_refiles_for_divorce/#comment-6220</guid>
		<description>IC,

I was just about to speak to Rosalind about her &quot;tone&quot; of voice which depicted anger. However, I see you have banned her.

I&#039;m like you. I refuse to tolerate disrespect on a blog I&#039;m paying for out of my personal pocket and giving my precious time to for everyone to enjoy.

Rosalind could have made the same point to you without coming at you with an axe.

If you are reading this Rosalind, remember that people do not mind you disagreeing with them. But if you leave someone feeling like they have been hit with a fist in the stomach, what have you gained?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IC,</p>
<p>I was just about to speak to Rosalind about her &#8220;tone&#8221; of voice which depicted anger. However, I see you have banned her.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m like you. I refuse to tolerate disrespect on a blog I&#8217;m paying for out of my personal pocket and giving my precious time to for everyone to enjoy.</p>
<p>Rosalind could have made the same point to you without coming at you with an axe.</p>
<p>If you are reading this Rosalind, remember that people do not mind you disagreeing with them. But if you leave someone feeling like they have been hit with a fist in the stomach, what have you gained?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IndependentConservative</title>
		<link>http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/09/29/bynum_refiles_for_divorce/comment-page-1/#comment-6211</link>
		<dc:creator>IndependentConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 04:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/09/29/bynum_refiles_for_divorce/#comment-6211</guid>
		<description>Praiser4Life - Did you get the feeling the Robin Roberts might actually be a fan of Bynum?

Yea there is lots we don&#039;t know about.  But we know the &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?book_id=24&amp;chapter=31&amp;version=50&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Proverbs 31&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt; woman did all she could, that must be why she left :? .  But I&#039;m sure she cooked the hired help breakfast before leaving :D .

I hope nobody here is playing into this marketing game and actually planning to buy a copy of Essence just to read this nonsense from &lt;em&gt;Mrs. &quot;I won&#039;t break the covenant&quot;&lt;/em&gt;.

And I think Weeks has a load of his own that he&#039;ll unleash if Bynum talks too much.

A Pimp Empire Implosion!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Praiser4Life &#8211; Did you get the feeling the Robin Roberts might actually be a fan of Bynum?</p>
<p>Yea there is lots we don&#8217;t know about.  But we know the <em><a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?book_id=24&amp;chapter=31&amp;version=50" rel="nofollow">Proverbs 31</a></em> woman did all she could, that must be why she left <img src='http://www.independentconservative.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_confused.gif' alt=':?' class='wp-smiley' />  .  But I&#8217;m sure she cooked the hired help breakfast before leaving <img src='http://www.independentconservative.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  .</p>
<p>I hope nobody here is playing into this marketing game and actually planning to buy a copy of Essence just to read this nonsense from <em>Mrs. &#8220;I won&#8217;t break the covenant&#8221;</em>.</p>
<p>And I think Weeks has a load of his own that he&#8217;ll unleash if Bynum talks too much.</p>
<p>A Pimp Empire Implosion!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Praiser4Life</title>
		<link>http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/09/29/bynum_refiles_for_divorce/comment-page-1/#comment-6210</link>
		<dc:creator>Praiser4Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 04:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/09/29/bynum_refiles_for_divorce/#comment-6210</guid>
		<description>There is more to this than Bynum or Weeks is saying. Robyn Roberts (GMA) asked her why were they separated for 3 mos. Of course she side stepped this question. She also said she was in counseling for 12 wks. w/Weeks Sr. and other outside counsellors. And all this was before the parking lot incident. Something was going on before the parking lot and I believe what happened that night was the nail in the coffin for Junie B. I&#039;m sure we&#039;ll get the scoop when the December issue of Essence hits the stands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is more to this than Bynum or Weeks is saying. Robyn Roberts (GMA) asked her why were they separated for 3 mos. Of course she side stepped this question. She also said she was in counseling for 12 wks. w/Weeks Sr. and other outside counsellors. And all this was before the parking lot incident. Something was going on before the parking lot and I believe what happened that night was the nail in the coffin for Junie B. I&#8217;m sure we&#8217;ll get the scoop when the December issue of Essence hits the stands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IndependentConservative</title>
		<link>http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/09/29/bynum_refiles_for_divorce/comment-page-1/#comment-6209</link>
		<dc:creator>IndependentConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 01:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/09/29/bynum_refiles_for_divorce/#comment-6209</guid>
		<description>s-wizzle - Now the &lt;em&gt;prophetess&lt;/em&gt; said she would do all she could to keep her marriage, so if it feel apart it would not be &lt;em&gt;her fault.  

(Almost like she was waiting for it to fail, so she could run a tally list to defend her image.  Out one side of her mouth she said it takes two people to make a marriage fail and out of the other she said if hers was to fail it would not be her fault.)&lt;/em&gt;

I&#039;m sure when she separated from Weeks, that was her working to &quot;keep&quot; the marriage too.  That was a &lt;em&gt;little secret&lt;/em&gt; nobody knew about WHILE she was counseling others on their marriages.  Of course you know, this was all done because she&#039;s a &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Proverbs%2031;&amp;version=50;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Proverbs 31&lt;/a&gt; woman&lt;/em&gt; :? .

Even before the incident with Weeks, can&#039;t you see that she was working very hard to keep the marriage together and keep her husband &lt;em&gt;so happy and whipped&lt;/em&gt; that he would not think about anyone else?  Isn&#039;t it obvious :oops: ?

So the divorce filing is her way of showing she &lt;em&gt;loves and forgives&lt;/em&gt; Weeks.  Her way of showing that their &quot;covenant&quot; made via a special multi-million dollar ceremony and broadcast on TBN is for real.  The earlier secret ceremony was not enough.  She wanted everyone to see a &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Proverbs%2031;&amp;version=50;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Proverbs 31&lt;/a&gt; woman&lt;/em&gt;.  

I&#039;m sure if we spoke to Bynum&#039;s housekeepers, they would say that she fulfilled &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=proverbs%2031:15;&amp;version=50;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Proverbs 31:15&lt;/a&gt; and cooked them breakfast :eek: .

I mean when &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/09/05/raw_juanita/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;she&#039;s hustling the poor for money&lt;/a&gt;, didn&#039;t you know she&#039;s fulfilling &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Proverbs%2031:20;&amp;version=50;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Proverbs 31:20&lt;/a&gt; :? ?

When she was speaking just before the incident, didn&#039;t you hear the kindness of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Proverbs%2031:26;&amp;version=50;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Proverbs 31:26&lt;/a&gt; in her voice :oops: ?

I don&#039;t know where her kids are, but I&#039;m sure she&#039;s got &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Proverbs%2031:28;&amp;version=50;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Proverbs 31:28&lt;/a&gt; down cold!

Her &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/06/08/juanita_bynum_plastic_surgery/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;plastic surgery&lt;/a&gt; was her way of representing &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Proverbs%2031:30;&amp;version=50;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Proverbs 31:30&lt;/a&gt;.

Her refiling is just her way of showing she&#039;s very determined to do all she can to ensure when the marriage fails that it&#039;s not &lt;em&gt;her fault&lt;/em&gt;.  She married an &lt;em&gt;assignment&lt;/em&gt; and she knew that she&#039;d see the &lt;em&gt;worst&lt;/em&gt; in him during the marriage and she said she&#039;s sticking in there, because &lt;em&gt;she does not keep the vows by &quot;faith&quot;, she &quot;walked&quot; the vows&lt;/em&gt;. 

I keep my marriage vows by faith and I&#039;ve been married and faithful to 1 wife longer than she&#039;s been in 2 marriages.  I think I&#039;ll stick with FAITH instead of her WALKING THE VOWS method.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>s-wizzle &#8211; Now the <em>prophetess</em> said she would do all she could to keep her marriage, so if it feel apart it would not be <em>her fault.  </p>
<p>(Almost like she was waiting for it to fail, so she could run a tally list to defend her image.  Out one side of her mouth she said it takes two people to make a marriage fail and out of the other she said if hers was to fail it would not be her fault.)</em></p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure when she separated from Weeks, that was her working to &#8220;keep&#8221; the marriage too.  That was a <em>little secret</em> nobody knew about WHILE she was counseling others on their marriages.  Of course you know, this was all done because she&#8217;s a <em><a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Proverbs%2031;&amp;version=50;" rel="nofollow">Proverbs 31</a> woman</em> <img src='http://www.independentconservative.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_confused.gif' alt=':?' class='wp-smiley' />  .</p>
<p>Even before the incident with Weeks, can&#8217;t you see that she was working very hard to keep the marriage together and keep her husband <em>so happy and whipped</em> that he would not think about anyone else?  Isn&#8217;t it obvious <img src='http://www.independentconservative.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_redface.gif' alt=':oops:' class='wp-smiley' />  ?</p>
<p>So the divorce filing is her way of showing she <em>loves and forgives</em> Weeks.  Her way of showing that their &#8220;covenant&#8221; made via a special multi-million dollar ceremony and broadcast on TBN is for real.  The earlier secret ceremony was not enough.  She wanted everyone to see a <em><a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Proverbs%2031;&amp;version=50;" rel="nofollow">Proverbs 31</a> woman</em>.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure if we spoke to Bynum&#8217;s housekeepers, they would say that she fulfilled <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=proverbs%2031:15;&amp;version=50;" rel="nofollow">Proverbs 31:15</a> and cooked them breakfast <img src='http://www.independentconservative.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif' alt=':eek:' class='wp-smiley' />  .</p>
<p>I mean when <a href="http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/09/05/raw_juanita/" rel="nofollow">she&#8217;s hustling the poor for money</a>, didn&#8217;t you know she&#8217;s fulfilling <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Proverbs%2031:20;&amp;version=50;" rel="nofollow">Proverbs 31:20</a> <img src='http://www.independentconservative.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_confused.gif' alt=':?' class='wp-smiley' />  ?</p>
<p>When she was speaking just before the incident, didn&#8217;t you hear the kindness of <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Proverbs%2031:26;&amp;version=50;" rel="nofollow">Proverbs 31:26</a> in her voice <img src='http://www.independentconservative.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_redface.gif' alt=':oops:' class='wp-smiley' />  ?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know where her kids are, but I&#8217;m sure she&#8217;s got <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Proverbs%2031:28;&amp;version=50;" rel="nofollow">Proverbs 31:28</a> down cold!</p>
<p>Her <a href="http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/06/08/juanita_bynum_plastic_surgery/" rel="nofollow">plastic surgery</a> was her way of representing <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Proverbs%2031:30;&amp;version=50;" rel="nofollow">Proverbs 31:30</a>.</p>
<p>Her refiling is just her way of showing she&#8217;s very determined to do all she can to ensure when the marriage fails that it&#8217;s not <em>her fault</em>.  She married an <em>assignment</em> and she knew that she&#8217;d see the <em>worst</em> in him during the marriage and she said she&#8217;s sticking in there, because <em>she does not keep the vows by &#8220;faith&#8221;, she &#8220;walked&#8221; the vows</em>. </p>
<p>I keep my marriage vows by faith and I&#8217;ve been married and faithful to 1 wife longer than she&#8217;s been in 2 marriages.  I think I&#8217;ll stick with FAITH instead of her WALKING THE VOWS method.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IndependentConservative</title>
		<link>http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/09/29/bynum_refiles_for_divorce/comment-page-1/#comment-6207</link>
		<dc:creator>IndependentConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 00:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/09/29/bynum_refiles_for_divorce/#comment-6207</guid>
		<description>rosalind - I&#039;m a busy man and you&#039;re gone.  You&#039;ve got some racial issues I really don&#039;t feel like having to hear you spin around any longer.

As if the topic of this discussion is not a Black Pentecostal :roll: .

Bye-Buh rosalind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rosalind &#8211; I&#8217;m a busy man and you&#8217;re gone.  You&#8217;ve got some racial issues I really don&#8217;t feel like having to hear you spin around any longer.</p>
<p>As if the topic of this discussion is not a Black Pentecostal <img src='http://www.independentconservative.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif' alt=':roll:' class='wp-smiley' />  .</p>
<p>Bye-Buh rosalind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: s-wizzle</title>
		<link>http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/09/29/bynum_refiles_for_divorce/comment-page-1/#comment-6206</link>
		<dc:creator>s-wizzle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 22:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/09/29/bynum_refiles_for_divorce/#comment-6206</guid>
		<description>IC,

I guess Bynum doesn&#039;t listen to her own messages. She has a teaching titled &quot;Pride vs Proverbs 31 Woman.&quot; She obviously didn&#039;t review that before filing and refiling for divorce. 

She can get a copy on clearance at Weeks site for the low, low price of $5. &quot;All resources must go!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IC,</p>
<p>I guess Bynum doesn&#8217;t listen to her own messages. She has a teaching titled &#8220;Pride vs Proverbs 31 Woman.&#8221; She obviously didn&#8217;t review that before filing and refiling for divorce. </p>
<p>She can get a copy on clearance at Weeks site for the low, low price of $5. &#8220;All resources must go!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rosalind</title>
		<link>http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/09/29/bynum_refiles_for_divorce/comment-page-1/#comment-6205</link>
		<dc:creator>rosalind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 21:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/09/29/bynum_refiles_for_divorce/#comment-6205</guid>
		<description>IC, everyone knows there is a difference in the black church and white evangelical/conservative church traditions. It&#039;s not a secret. That&#039;s all I meant by specifically mentioning race. 

No, I didn&#039;t mention black Pentecostals and Apostolics who adhere to legalism, and the reason why I didn&#039;t is because they are not relevant, here. I know YOU are not one of them, but are a part of (or closer to) the white conservative evangelical tradition. So, I commented to you based on that. Were you a Pentecostal or Apostolic, I would have commented to you based on THAT. But, if you would rather that I didn&#039;t narrow my focus, and just start being willy-nilly with my comments, I can do that, but I don&#039;t think that&#039;s what you want. Stop trying to make more out of this than it is. Instead of trying to insinuate something &quot;dark&quot; about my comment, why didn&#039;t you just ask me what I meant? That&#039;d be too much like right, though.

And, what does you having some best friends who are white conservative evangelicals have to do with me? What point are you trying to make by telling me this? That&#039;s YOUR experience. I didn&#039;t say, or insinuate, that because *I* haven&#039;t had (and I did think about it before I wrote this next word) ANY positive experiences with white conservative evangelicals, that nobody else would. Your positive experiences with them is not going to nullify my negative ones. So, again, what point are you trying to make by telling me about your friends? 

Why do feel the need to tell me you stand by your statements? I didn&#039;t try to change your mind, nor did I attempt to defend Bynum. I didn&#039;t even mention her. Since you seem to like reading into things, why didn&#039;t you read anything into that? Anyway, I just wanted to know where you thought grace and mercy fit into the picture. Nothing more, nothing less. You told me, and I explained why I asked. Now, as far as I&#039;m concerned that&#039;s that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IC, everyone knows there is a difference in the black church and white evangelical/conservative church traditions. It&#8217;s not a secret. That&#8217;s all I meant by specifically mentioning race. </p>
<p>No, I didn&#8217;t mention black Pentecostals and Apostolics who adhere to legalism, and the reason why I didn&#8217;t is because they are not relevant, here. I know YOU are not one of them, but are a part of (or closer to) the white conservative evangelical tradition. So, I commented to you based on that. Were you a Pentecostal or Apostolic, I would have commented to you based on THAT. But, if you would rather that I didn&#8217;t narrow my focus, and just start being willy-nilly with my comments, I can do that, but I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s what you want. Stop trying to make more out of this than it is. Instead of trying to insinuate something &#8220;dark&#8221; about my comment, why didn&#8217;t you just ask me what I meant? That&#8217;d be too much like right, though.</p>
<p>And, what does you having some best friends who are white conservative evangelicals have to do with me? What point are you trying to make by telling me this? That&#8217;s YOUR experience. I didn&#8217;t say, or insinuate, that because *I* haven&#8217;t had (and I did think about it before I wrote this next word) ANY positive experiences with white conservative evangelicals, that nobody else would. Your positive experiences with them is not going to nullify my negative ones. So, again, what point are you trying to make by telling me about your friends? </p>
<p>Why do feel the need to tell me you stand by your statements? I didn&#8217;t try to change your mind, nor did I attempt to defend Bynum. I didn&#8217;t even mention her. Since you seem to like reading into things, why didn&#8217;t you read anything into that? Anyway, I just wanted to know where you thought grace and mercy fit into the picture. Nothing more, nothing less. You told me, and I explained why I asked. Now, as far as I&#8217;m concerned that&#8217;s that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IndependentConservative</title>
		<link>http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/09/29/bynum_refiles_for_divorce/comment-page-1/#comment-6204</link>
		<dc:creator>IndependentConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 20:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/09/29/bynum_refiles_for_divorce/#comment-6204</guid>
		<description>rosalind - I should also point out, that someone can do wrong and be forgiven, however even we who get to Heaven have to give an account in the end, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Corinthians%203:11-17;&amp;version=50;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;1 Corinthians 3:11-17&lt;/a&gt;.

This is why when Paul spoke on issues of marriage in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Corinthians%207;&amp;version=50;&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;1 Corinthians 7&lt;/a&gt;, he did not dwell on grace and mercy, but gave the commands and left it at that.

The only time Paul uses the word &quot;mercy&quot; in that entire chapter is when speaking of his own apostolic authority.

And I know some BLACK Pentocostals that will toss anyone who has remarried straight into hell with their own hand if they could.  Be happy I don&#039;t speak based on the doctrine I knew for a good part of my youth.  I know people who would send a woman to hell for wearing red nail polish, or wearing shoes that show any part of her foot, or wear a pair of pants no matter how modest.  And don&#039;t even dream of getting in a swimming pool!  Trust me, I once knew legalism and I didn&#039;t like it either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rosalind &#8211; I should also point out, that someone can do wrong and be forgiven, however even we who get to Heaven have to give an account in the end, <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Corinthians%203:11-17;&amp;version=50;" rel="nofollow">1 Corinthians 3:11-17</a>.</p>
<p>This is why when Paul spoke on issues of marriage in <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Corinthians%207;&amp;version=50;" rel="nofollow">1 Corinthians 7</a>, he did not dwell on grace and mercy, but gave the commands and left it at that.</p>
<p>The only time Paul uses the word &#8220;mercy&#8221; in that entire chapter is when speaking of his own apostolic authority.</p>
<p>And I know some BLACK Pentocostals that will toss anyone who has remarried straight into hell with their own hand if they could.  Be happy I don&#8217;t speak based on the doctrine I knew for a good part of my youth.  I know people who would send a woman to hell for wearing red nail polish, or wearing shoes that show any part of her foot, or wear a pair of pants no matter how modest.  And don&#8217;t even dream of getting in a swimming pool!  Trust me, I once knew legalism and I didn&#8217;t like it either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
