Independent Conservative » Blog Archive » The Implosion of a Pulpit Pimp Empire! Weeks vs. Bynum. Weeks Speaks. Gives Lesson on How NOT to Reconcile a Marriage.

The Implosion of a Pulpit Pimp Empire! Weeks vs. Bynum. Weeks Speaks. Gives Lesson on How NOT to Reconcile a Marriage.

by IndependentConservative @ 10:14 pm. Filed under Nuts on Parade

I was planning not to make a post about this. But I think that speaking on this latest move by the false teacher who does not represent the Gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ named Thomas Weeks III can be a good object lesson for married men. A lesson in how NOT to respond when your wife goes on emotional tangents to smear you. Although theirs is an adulterous marriage, given it is not the first for either of them, all married men should consider the following scripture.

1 Peter 3:7 (New King James Version)

7) Husbands, likewise, dwell with them with understanding, giving honor to the wife, as to the weaker vessel, and as being heirs together of the grace of life, that your prayers may not be hindered.

It’s easy to claim the wife as the weaker vessel physically. However, it is also the wife who more often wears her emotions on her sleeve. Given this, it is the husband who must always be the cooler head when things are testy. Weeks in the video below, while firing a few salvos at Bynum and defending his own image, gives us an object lesson in how men should not BLAB LIKE A WOMAN. But oh that’s right, Weeks is a punk, so I guess this was coming.

Bishop Thomas Weeks, III PRESS CONFERENCE 9.14.07
What you see above is a CEO (a false teaching pulpit pimp) trying to salvage his corporation.

Thomas Weeks makes the following claims, that conflict with the impression given by Team Bynum and while Weeks is a blabbing punk these are interesting claims:

Bynum announced separation back in June and had her likeness legally removed from all of Weeks’ business (oh they call it “ministry”) materials.
Weeks made sure to mention to the entire world that he was with Bynum the “entire night” before the meeting at the hotel. That’s just trashy to mention. But what else do you expect from a guy who makes material like this?
Met at hotel for business (so-called ministry) not to “reconcile”. This is totally counter to what Team Bynum claims, given Team Bynum said the hotel meeting was an effort to reconcile.
Says he was always faithful to Bynum.
Is against violence and walked away from Bynum the night of the alleged assault. Said nothing about hitting her. Gave the full impression that he did not hit her and the media is saying that he’s denying hitting her. He said he walked away and is against violence, but gave no other details. He actually did not outright deny the assertions that he hit her, but said he’s against violence and walked away. He never said “I did not hit her that night”. He did not say “The claims I hit Bynum are false”. He said he can’t talk about it more given the legal matters.
This other media report has video with Team Bynum’s response to the Weeks’ press conference and notes Bynum is still hanging out with Obama.

Weeks should have kept his mouth shut. If he’s got the goods to clear his name, do it at the trials and if needed after that before the church. But blabbing LIKE A WOMAN with press conferences about your wife is just not godly or manly.

Anyway, both Juanita Bynum the newest member of the Obama fan club and Thomas Weeks III are false teachers and not the example for any saint.

Related posts:

[link]

9 Responses to “The Implosion of a Pulpit Pimp Empire! Weeks vs. Bynum. Weeks Speaks. Gives Lesson on How NOT to Reconcile a Marriage.”

Praiser4Life Says:
September 14th, 2007 at 11:54 pm
I agree the brotha’ needs to be quiet. He shouldn’t give anymore details until the trial. If Juanita lied it will definitely come out. I always said Juanita told her side of the story first to make him look like the villian and to make herself look like the victim. She’s making it seem like she didn’t do anything, he just attacked her for no reason. I’m not saying he had the right to beat her up, because he didn’t. I just don’t believe Juanita is as innocent as she’s claiming to be.
KyleNYC Says:
September 15th, 2007 at 12:48 pm
Hmmm…methinks someone is trying to use the Eddie Murphy “It wasn’t me” Jedi mind trick.
fourpointer Says:
September 15th, 2007 at 1:27 pm
TommyBoy says there are two sides to every story. Not quite. There’s an old saying that says there are three sides to every story: yours, mine, and the cold, hard truth.
alady1969 Says:
September 20th, 2007 at 6:55 pm
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/20/us/20preacher.html?_r=1&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&adxnnlx=1190328847-115P4dxlflah25TsoqqopQ
alady1969 Says:
September 20th, 2007 at 6:57 pm
This chic has an article in the New York Times!!! Give me a break!
Praiser4Life Says:
September 20th, 2007 at 11:02 pm
Junie B. said, “I made a right decision that went bad.”
No, you made a bad decision that grew worse.

Junie says, “I want to hear ‘Hold on’ from somebody who is really holding on.”
I do too!!

Dr. Lee said, Maybe she’s been living a lie all these years.”
And let the church say, Amen!

She later said there had been previous instances of “pushing and shoving” and that she wanted to “take some classes” to find out why she attracted abusive men.
Here’s a suggestion:
http://www.glbttherapy.com/DomesticViolence06.html
IndependentConservative Says:
September 21st, 2007 at 12:59 am
She did sort of hint that her whole “prophetess” role is an act when she said:

“What happened to me was reality,”

Of course her duping vulnerable people out of their cash and her spending it on a lavish lifestyle are “reality” too, but she’s not around when those people have “real” debts that are not removed by that anoooting she claims comes with giving her cash.

And yea it was a bad decision. Funny she associates it with a Cadillac .

And another interesting quote from her using the term “covenant”:

In the seminars, she sermonized, “I don’t care what kind of husband you got, that’s your covenant vow, and you have a responsibility to make him feel like he’s a wonder when you know he ain’t.”

She’s keeping as many “covenant vows” as the movie stars in Hollywood at this rate! (With the marriages lasting about as long too.) Because she’ll probably go for it a 3rd time. And she wants to bring “social change”…yea…OK. This is like the guy who repeatedly gets in car accidents opening a driving school. If all women changed into the image of Bynum, we’re doomed!

She used “no more sheets” to encourage acceptance of someone who was not qualified to be a church leader and too weak in scripture to even teach a children’s Sunday school class. Oh but she “feels your pain and knows where you are”. That keeps her RICH. She plays on others’ pain and runs it to the bank!

The queen of bad doctrine keeps it coming.
pookie Says:
November 16th, 2007 at 8:21 pm
Like everyone, I am completely opposed to domestic violence, men hitting women and vice versa…OH! to be a fly on the wall. IC, do you really see this as an implosion? I mean, although pimpin’ ain’t easy, it’s hard to keep a good one down. I can just see it, anointed domestic violence oil…even so Lord, come!
IndependentConservative Says:
November 16th, 2007 at 8:32 pm
The full implosion of the Bynum-Weeks Corp. is not yet complete. Bynum is adding to it with her coming magazine articles. Weeks might fire back.

It could get worse. Much worse.

This is why Weeks has been practically begging Bynum to settle with him out of court.