Comments on: Wrongly Divided Word by Frederick K.C. Price Versus the Truth! http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/08/17/price_bad_with_scripture/ The Independent Conservative saying what needs to be said! Wed, 30 Mar 2011 21:35:55 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: IndependentConservative http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/08/17/price_bad_with_scripture/comment-page-1/#comment-5579 IndependentConservative Fri, 17 Aug 2007 22:15:32 +0000 http://www.independentconservative.com/?p=1517#comment-5579 Hey, <a href="http://codex.wordpress.org/Using_Smilies" rel="nofollow">check out this page to learn how to make all the smilies.</a> :cool: Hey, check out this page to learn how to make all the smilies.
:cool:

]]> By: alady1969 http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/08/17/price_bad_with_scripture/comment-page-1/#comment-5578 alady1969 Fri, 17 Aug 2007 19:54:48 +0000 http://www.independentconservative.com/?p=1517#comment-5578 OK, thanks alot. I study from NKJV but will have the NIV near in case I just can't get it. Then I'll go back and re-read it in NKJV/KJV and do my word search and research from those 2 version. I've heard NAS is a good version but haven't heard much about the ESV. thanks again. I'll check them out my next trip to the christian book store...smiless OK, thanks alot. I study from NKJV but will have the NIV near in case I just can’t get it. Then I’ll go back and re-read it in NKJV/KJV and do my word search and research from those 2 version. I’ve heard NAS is a good version but haven’t heard much about the ESV. thanks again. I’ll check them out my next trip to the christian book store…smiless

]]> By: IndependentConservative http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/08/17/price_bad_with_scripture/comment-page-1/#comment-5576 IndependentConservative Fri, 17 Aug 2007 19:07:14 +0000 http://www.independentconservative.com/?p=1517#comment-5576 I typically do NKJV too and <b>THAT IS THE VERSION FRED PRICE WAS READING FROM!!!</b> The bottom line is that Fred is a pimp, he'll do damage no matter what version you give him. I've started leaning to the ESV and if you noticed, every blue moon I'll use the ESV version of scripture here. I have not been using the NAS version, but having skimmed it I don't have a problem with it. There are only 2 translations that I sound a LOUD WARNING AGAINST. Those are "The Message" and "Good News" versions. "The Message" version was done by one guy who wanted to excite his Sunday school class. It seems people like Joel Osteen like to reference it and I've found that from my read, reference, research and study of scripture it fails to represent things honestly. It's a good one to use if you desire to push heresy like the prosperity doctrine though :D . The "Good News" version although I've never looked at it much at all, every true saint I know that uses it eventually dumps it. I've been told it misrepresents scripture towards a Unitarian view. Not that I've checked out every one, but those 2 I avoid. KJV, NKJV, ESV are the 3 I typically find myself using and I guess I'll give the NAS more of a look now. NIV is OK, I just never use it much. Brother Greene at <a href="http://www.inyourbible.com/" rel="nofollow">InYourBible.com</a> prefers the NIV and I've found him discover some things there that are not explained as well in some other translations. He didn't even realize other translations didn't explain one thing he notes in his videos, till I told him :D . Some folks love the 1611 KJV and will touch nothing else. The 16111 KJV is fine with me, I just use another translation more often, given more recent findings and to have a version that reads closer to modern language. I can cover in study with NJKV or ESV in 30 minutes what will take me hours to get right with the KJV. The various versions have words and sometimes entire verses that are either changed or totally removed. KJV, NKJV, NIV, NAS and ESV are not all the same. But I feel all of them offer a good interpretation of scripture when read in full. It seems when you want to be nearest the original Greek, scholars trend towards with ESV and I guess NAS and it seems they are similar in many aspects. That's why I'm starting to lean towards ESV, but I'm still reading and researching things. Who knows, maybe I'll end up at NAS too. I typically do NKJV too and THAT IS THE VERSION FRED PRICE WAS READING FROM!!! The bottom line is that Fred is a pimp, he’ll do damage no matter what version you give him.

I’ve started leaning to the ESV and if you noticed, every blue moon I’ll use the ESV version of scripture here. I have not been using the NAS version, but having skimmed it I don’t have a problem with it. There are only 2 translations that I sound a LOUD WARNING AGAINST. Those are “The Message” and “Good News” versions. “The Message” version was done by one guy who wanted to excite his Sunday school class. It seems people like Joel Osteen like to reference it and I’ve found that from my read, reference, research and study of scripture it fails to represent things honestly. It’s a good one to use if you desire to push heresy like the prosperity doctrine though :D . The “Good News” version although I’ve never looked at it much at all, every true saint I know that uses it eventually dumps it. I’ve been told it misrepresents scripture towards a Unitarian view. Not that I’ve checked out every one, but those 2 I avoid.

KJV, NKJV, ESV are the 3 I typically find myself using and I guess I’ll give the NAS more of a look now. NIV is OK, I just never use it much. Brother Greene at InYourBible.com prefers the NIV and I’ve found him discover some things there that are not explained as well in some other translations. He didn’t even realize other translations didn’t explain one thing he notes in his videos, till I told him :D .

Some folks love the 1611 KJV and will touch nothing else. The 16111 KJV is fine with me, I just use another translation more often, given more recent findings and to have a version that reads closer to modern language. I can cover in study with NJKV or ESV in 30 minutes what will take me hours to get right with the KJV.

The various versions have words and sometimes entire verses that are either changed or totally removed. KJV, NKJV, NIV, NAS and ESV are not all the same. But I feel all of them offer a good interpretation of scripture when read in full. It seems when you want to be nearest the original Greek, scholars trend towards with ESV and I guess NAS and it seems they are similar in many aspects. That’s why I’m starting to lean towards ESV, but I’m still reading and researching things. Who knows, maybe I’ll end up at NAS too.

]]> By: alady1969 http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/08/17/price_bad_with_scripture/comment-page-1/#comment-5575 alady1969 Fri, 17 Aug 2007 18:21:59 +0000 http://www.independentconservative.com/?p=1517#comment-5575 WOW!!!!! unbelievable. IC which translation of the Bible would you recommend? I currently have KJ, NKJ, and NIV. I do must of my studying from the NKJ. WOW!!!!! unbelievable. IC which translation of the Bible would you recommend? I currently have KJ, NKJ, and NIV. I do must of my studying from the NKJ.

]]> By: art123 http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/08/17/price_bad_with_scripture/comment-page-1/#comment-5574 art123 Fri, 17 Aug 2007 17:50:01 +0000 http://www.independentconservative.com/?p=1517#comment-5574 I've been there and I'm sure that many of us been hustled like that. I thought that I was robbing God when I wasn't paying 10% of my gross income. As it turns out, I wasn't robbing God, the mand of gawd was robbing me. I’ve been there and I’m sure that many of us been hustled like that. I thought that I was robbing God when I wasn’t paying 10% of my gross income. As it turns out, I wasn’t robbing God, the mand of gawd was robbing me.

]]>