Rekjalhew

June 11, 2007

La Shawn Barber Stands Against Efforts to Tarnish the Real Civil Rights Movement. Booker Rising Proves to Stand Against Booker T. Washington!

by @ 10:47 am. Filed under The Truth Shall Set you Free!

Check out La Shawn Barber’s commentary on how homosexuals are trying to hijack the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960’s for themselves. She also has a short post about it on her blog.

La Shawn is 100% correct. However, look at what Shay over at Booker Rising, a blog that supposedly stands in ready defense of Blacks has to say about La Shawn’s commentary.

Shay at Booker Rising responds to LA SHAWN BARBER COMMENTARY: Interracial Marriage: Slippery Slope?

My response: If marriage was about rearing children, then many couples could not marry. It is not the government’s business if non-related, consenting adults want to enter a union…be it one man and one woman, two men, two women, one man and two women, or one woman and two men. They are all lifestyle choices. Prohibition against close relatives marrying can be done on genetic grounds. La Shawn surely knows that children are not mature enough to consent.

La Shawn in right, Shay is wrong.

Sitting back while deviants assume ownership of efforts that were carried out to ensure Civil Rights for Blacks only ensures that all such efforts true meaning is allowed to be tarnished.

The expressed intent of things like the 14 Amendment was to stop racial double standards. Shay knows that NOBODY at any step of the development of Loving v. Virginia or the 14th Amendment was trying to grant anything to homosexuals. It is silly to place an immutable and constitutionally protected quality like race on a level with sexual deviancy.

The framers and all throughout American history, regardless of views on race, all sides knew marriage is the union of one man and one woman. Which is why Utah had to denounce polygamy to be accepted into the USA.

Countless Blacks who died in the effort for Civil Rights roll in their graves when they read the words from Shay on Booker Rising. Including Booker T. Washington HIMSELF!

Shay represents the view of secular humanism. A view in regards to marriage that goes against the history of Blacks in America and around the globe. A view that goes against the polling and voting record of Blacks in states where ballot initiatives have taken place to codify the definition of marriage. A view that defies the moral majority view of Blacks throughout American history. And most importantly, a view that goes against the Lord God that made her.

Jesus made the rules clear.

Mark 10:6-9 (New King James Version)

6) But from the beginning of the creation, God ?made them male and female.?

7) ?For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife,

8) and the two shall become one flesh?; so then they are no longer two, but one flesh.

9) Therefore what God has joined together, let not man separate.?

And Booker T. Washington was a Christian man.



Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Independent Conservative - Copyright 2008 - Copyright Notice

[powered by WordPress.]

31 queries. 0.264 seconds