http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/04/29/vids_removed_by_benny_hinn/ The Independent Conservative saying what needs to be said! Mon, 08 Mar 2010 18:27:23 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9 hourly 1 http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/04/29/vids_removed_by_benny_hinn/comment-page-1/#comment-11832 Coyne1988 Wed, 29 Apr 2009 21:23:18 +0000 http://www.independentconservative.com/?p=1353#comment-11832 There was a video entitled, "Televangelist Scandals", which was posted by youtube user ShawnML2, and it too got removed due to alledged copyright infringement, here's the claim: "This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by Jimmy Swaggart Ministries". Now if Jimmy Swaggart were truly repentant, why would he file a DMCA on a video that's really not for him to be filing a dmca against to begin with? Now yes, it hink it had stuff involving Swaggart's adulterous affair, but he didnt compile the video itself and besides, it's called fair-use and, again, if he was truly repentant, i doubt he would have filed that DMCA like he did. I can't seem to get a copy of the link itself, but I do have it in my favorites on youtube. There was a video entitled, “Televangelist Scandals”, which was posted by youtube user ShawnML2, and it too got removed due to alledged copyright infringement, here’s the claim: “This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by Jimmy Swaggart Ministries”. Now if Jimmy Swaggart were truly repentant, why would he file a DMCA on a video that’s really not for him to be filing a dmca against to begin with? Now yes, it hink it had stuff involving Swaggart’s adulterous affair, but he didnt compile the video itself and besides, it’s called fair-use and, again, if he was truly repentant, i doubt he would have filed that DMCA like he did. I can’t seem to get a copy of the link itself, but I do have it in my favorites on youtube.

]]> http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/04/29/vids_removed_by_benny_hinn/comment-page-1/#comment-11810 IndependentConservative Fri, 06 Mar 2009 06:54:28 +0000 http://www.independentconservative.com/?p=1353#comment-11810 If needed, <a href="http://www.independentconservative.com/2008/08/07/the-lord-has-willed-that-this-blogs-youtube-account-remain-online/" rel="nofollow">there is a way to fight back and keep a video up, but you have to have done it within Fair Use guidelines.</a> Having seen some of your videos, I don't think you'd have any problem countering if you ever feel the need. If needed, there is a way to fight back and keep a video up, but you have to have done it within Fair Use guidelines. Having seen some of your videos, I don’t think you’d have any problem countering if you ever feel the need.

]]> http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/04/29/vids_removed_by_benny_hinn/comment-page-1/#comment-11808 Coyne1988 Fri, 06 Mar 2009 06:47:09 +0000 http://www.independentconservative.com/?p=1353#comment-11808 I had a similar situation happen to me. I'm doing a series called Con-Artists for [Another] Jesus where each week I expose a typical televangescamming pulpit pimp...with other types of heretics within professing christendom here and there(they're on my youtube channel, Coyne1988, feel free to use any of my videos on this blog any time). Funny thing though, the one who filed a dmca wasnt a pulpit pimp, it was the one I did my lastest expose on, open-air pelagian heretic, Kerrigan Skelly. Here's the article, http://christianresearchnetwork.com/?p=9602 I had a similar situation happen to me. I’m doing a series called Con-Artists for [Another] Jesus where each week I expose a typical televangescamming pulpit pimp…with other types of heretics within professing christendom here and there(they’re on my youtube channel, Coyne1988, feel free to use any of my videos on this blog any time). Funny thing though, the one who filed a dmca wasnt a pulpit pimp, it was the one I did my lastest expose on, open-air pelagian heretic, Kerrigan Skelly. Here’s the article, http://christianresearchnetwork.com/?p=9602

]]>