April 18, 2007

US Supreme Court Rules Some Babies Deserve Life. Upholds Partial Birth Abortion Ban!

by @ 3:00 pm. Filed under Judiciary

I guess we’ll take what we can get.

Supreme Court Upholds Partial-Birth Abortion Ban on 5-4 Decision

Washington, DC ( — The Supreme Court has reversed a decision it handed down in 2000 and upheld a Congressional ban on the gruesome partial-birth abortion procedure. The ruling indicated that the federal ban on the abortion procedure did not violate the so-called right to abortion established under Roe v. Wade.

Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote the majority opinion for the Supreme Court and indicated that the abortion advocates who sued to overturn the ban “have not demonstrated that the Act would be unconstitutional in a large fraction of relevant cases.”

President Bush signed the national partial-birth abortion ban into law in 2003 and abortion advocates took it to court in three separate lawsuits and federal courts in each case relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in 2000 and declared the ban unconstitutional.

Saying the “decision is alarming,” Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissented in the case and said the court should have followed its previous decision on the controversial abortions.

Justices Stephen Breyer, David Souter and John Paul Stevens joined her in the dissent.

The ruling is the first major abortion case in which new Chief Justice John Roberts and Associate Justice Samuel Alito have ruled, perhaps giving a clue as to their views on Roe itself.

As they did on the partial-birth abortion decision today, pro-life advocates hope the pair will join Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas and a fifth justice in the future who would form a five-judge group giving it the majority on the high court for the first time since the landmark 1973 case.

A fifth judge is needed because Justice Kennedy supports Roe despite his joining the majority in the partial-birth abortion case.

Dr. Anthony Levatino, a Las Cruces, New Mexico OBGYN who formerly did abortions in New York, says a partial-birth abortion is a three day long process and would never be a medical procedure a doctor would need to use to protect a woman’s health.

“The way you end a pregnancy to save a woman’s life is to deliver the (baby),” Levatino said. “If you wait three days to do a partial birth abortion, she’s going to end up in the morgue.”

Levatino said the health exception abortion advocates want is a “legal tactic” that has no basis in medical fact.

The cases are Gonzales v. Carhart, 05-380, and Gonzales v. Planned Parenthood, 05-1382.

I still await the day that this court admits they totally made up the “right” to kill babies at any stage in the womb. Baby killing is not protected by the US Constitution.

One Response to “US Supreme Court Rules Some Babies Deserve Life. Upholds Partial Birth Abortion Ban!”

  1. Blue Collar Republican » Blog Archive » Blog Burst April 18, 2007 Says:

    […] The Mail from Hell arrives at NBC How many? Defend Freedom…It’s Everybodys Job Beach Girl – Getting this off my chest! About the Virginia Tech slaying of innocents and Gun Control I want my rights back Wednesday’s Hero 4/18/07 This Weeks Soldier Was S… Daniel Sheehy — VDare.comChertoff, Gutierrez, Ri… Tancredo 2008: Not Presidential? 2008 Candidates Weak on Firearms Rights Tennessee’s Recent Past, Present and Future Meet the Baw’bags! A Liberal At A Conservative Magazine ~A Letter to Tennessee Senator`s~ First Step US Supreme Court Rules Some Babies Deserve Life. Upholds Partial Birth Abortion Ban! Well well No more tolerance for the 9th Circuit […]

Independent Conservative - Copyright 2008 - Copyright Notice

[powered by WordPress.]

52 queries. 0.373 seconds