<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DC Gun Ban Ruled Unconstitutional and Liberal Hypocrisy is Exposed Again!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/03/09/dc_gun_ban_ruling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/03/09/dc_gun_ban_ruling/</link>
	<description>The Independent Conservative saying what needs to be said!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 18:27:23 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Conservative Culture &#187; DC Gun Ban Unconstitutional</title>
		<link>http://www.independentconservative.com/2007/03/09/dc_gun_ban_ruling/comment-page-1/#comment-4933</link>
		<dc:creator>Conservative Culture &#187; DC Gun Ban Unconstitutional</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 17:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentconservative.com/?p=1261#comment-4933</guid>
		<description>[...] This could easily upset the cart for the next election. Who will further the gun rights as defined by the Constitution. Malkin has this posted from Allah.  &#8230;if the Supreme Court grants cert. If they don’t, it makes Rudy’s position even more important because other circuits are going to see gun-control challenges now that point to this decision. There’ll be probably be a split, but the split may not materialize until 2009. In which case it matters a whole lot what the next president thinks about the SA.  You can see from the Judge selection is vitally important. If the next President is weak on the approach to selecting judges then it will only weaken what has been a cause gaining new found strength. Independent Conservative finds it most interesting that the dissenting liberal judge finds that the Constitution doesn&#8217;t apply to the American citizens in the DC area. Funny how terrorists can be granted rights that some are willing to deny our own citizens.     Feedbacks on this entry via RSS 2.0 Please leave a Comment or discuss via Trackback! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This could easily upset the cart for the next election. Who will further the gun rights as defined by the Constitution. Malkin has this posted from Allah.  &#8230;if the Supreme Court grants cert. If they don’t, it makes Rudy’s position even more important because other circuits are going to see gun-control challenges now that point to this decision. There’ll be probably be a split, but the split may not materialize until 2009. In which case it matters a whole lot what the next president thinks about the SA.  You can see from the Judge selection is vitally important. If the next President is weak on the approach to selecting judges then it will only weaken what has been a cause gaining new found strength. Independent Conservative finds it most interesting that the dissenting liberal judge finds that the Constitution doesn&#8217;t apply to the American citizens in the DC area. Funny how terrorists can be granted rights that some are willing to deny our own citizens.     Feedbacks on this entry via RSS 2.0 Please leave a Comment or discuss via Trackback! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
