Rekjalhew

January 26, 2007

Proof of Christian Persecution in Burma.

by @ 11:57 am. Filed under Evangelicals Under Attack

Read all about it over at Go Pundit Go. Christians in that mostly Buddhist nation are being targeted for a complete eradication of the faith. The eradication effort makes note of the fact Christians are “very gentle” and the eradicators are using that to their advantage. Keep those who do the work of the Lord in your prayers.

Barack Hussein Obama versus Jesus Christ

by @ 10:52 am. Filed under Nuts on Parade

There is no more appropriate title for this post, because that is exactly what is going on with the US Senator and 2008 Presidential candidate Barack Hussein Obama. In this previous post I mentioned that it was discovered that Obama is uneasy about some parts of scripture in the Holy Bible. It is apparent one of those portions of scripture must be words direct from the mouth of Jesus Christ. The very cornerstone of the Christian faith.

Mark 10:6-9 (New King James Version)

6) But from the beginning of the creation, God ?made them male and female.?

7) ?For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife,

8) and the two shall become one flesh?; so then they are no longer two, but one flesh.

9) Therefore what God has joined together, let not man separate.?

Jesus made is clear that marriage is an institution for one man and one woman only. No other configuration fits the command of God. If Obama loves Jesus, this instruction is not optional.

John 14:21-24 (New King James Version)

21) He who has My commandments and keeps them, it is he who loves Me. And he who loves Me will be loved by My Father, and I will love him and manifest Myself to him.?

22) Judas (not Iscariot) said to Him, ?Lord, how is it that You will manifest Yourself to us, and not to the world??

23) Jesus answered and said to him, ?If anyone loves Me, he will keep My word; and My Father will love him, and We will come to him and make Our home with him.

24) He who does not love Me does not keep My words; and the word which you hear is not Mine but the Father?s who sent Me.

As the saying goes, your arms are too short to box with God, but Barack Hussein Obama is trying to fight against the one who he claims to believe in.

Obama a Player in Left’s Redefining of Christianity, Says Illinois ActivistAgape Press – 12/12/2006


Senator Obama is in the midst of a nationwide tour to generate support for a possible 2008 presidential run and to promote his book, The Audacity of Hope. In his memoir, Obama writes: “I was reminded that it is my obligation not only as an elected official in a pluralistic society, but also as a Christian, to remain open to the possibility that my unwillingness to support gay marriage is misguided.”

Peter LaBarbera is president of Americans for Truth and the former head of the Illinois Family Institute. The first-term senator can say he is talking religious values to the public and continue portraying himself as a traditional-values Christian, says LaBarbera, but Obama is actually advancing policies that attack those values.

“There’s no need to consider the idea that so-called ‘gay marriage’ is okay,” says LaBarbera. “We know that marriage is between a man or a woman; that’s what God made it to be. It’s wonderful, it’s beautiful. Homosexuality is not an option.”

And for Obama to say that, in order to be a good Christian, he has to consider “something that’s anti-Christian is just wrong,” says the Christian activist. He describes Obama as “as pro-abortion as they come, and very pro-homosexual.”

As we know, Senator Obama is a member of Chicago’s Trinity United Church of Christ, which is a member of the United Church of Christ (UCC) denomination. This denomination has taken a far Leftward slant, which Obama is aware of and endorses fully.


“The United Church of Christ has now merged with the largest gay church in the world, called the Cathedral of Hope, in Texas,” LaBarbera notes. “And so they’re welcoming in churches that are embracing homosexuality, so they’ve become one of the most liberal denominations in the country.”

At its General Synod last year, the UCC adopted a resolution calling for “equal marriage rights for all” — regardless of gender. Obama has been quoted as saying that the denomination’s “spirit of inclusiveness” has served as a model for him during his time in the Senate.

Now that we know Obama not only is a part of the UCC, but also endorses the doctrine of the denomination’s leaders, we must accept that he probably also endorses their anti-Semitism. The UCC is proud of Obama and a search of their site shows 31 hits for the name Barack Obama. So it is impossible to separate the doctrine of the UCC from Obama himself. Obama has indicated already that he’s in agreement with their views on the sinful temptations of the gay lifestyle. And he has never denounced their anti-Jewish/anti-Israel activity.


Related post:
The Source of Problems That Plague America Today.

Insight Magazine Strikes Back! Proves There are Issues With Claims Obama Was Never a Muslim. (Audio)

by @ 12:03 am. Filed under Audio, Questionable Items

Well just when I thought Insight Magazine might have been counted out regarding this story of Barack Hussein Obama having been a Muslim, they come back with more information that even Obama’s camp has to acknowledge actually is on record. Although they still deny Obama was ever a Muslim, but this information from another school in Indonesia records Obama was a Muslim.

Insight Magazine’s Editor Jeffrey T. Kuhner was on Sean Hannity’s radio program yesterday. And he had PLENTY to say. He is standing firm, that the Hillary camp found the information and was going to pump it to the media when they were ready. About 7-8 months from now and they are upset Insight broke the story. He claims to have “multiple sources from the Hillary camp”. Mr. Kuhner says Hillary is petrified of Obama. In part because she feels he has traction with the anti-war crowd.

Kuhner said when he contacted team Obama for comment, not only did they not have a comment, but Obama’s people were not ready to handle this. He says they were stunned and he feels that they are not ready for “prime time”. Mr. Kuhner also said that he feels they know the “Muslim issue” is something they can be hurt on.

Insight will have a follow up story. They feel they can reliably say “it seems that Obama has been downplaying his Muslim background” and that Obama was raised to some degree as a Muslim.

One piece of proof they have has already been reported in the MSM. When Obama first started school in Indonesia at a Catholic school, he was registered at that school as a Muslim. All students has to declare their faith and he was on record as a Muslim.

Now watch the spin move from Team Obama:


Obama’s mother, divorced from Obama’s father, married a man from Indonesia named Lolo Soetoro, and the family relocated to the country from 1967-71. At first, Obama attended the Catholic school, Fransiskus Assisis, where documents showed he enrolled as a Muslim, the religion of his stepfather.

The document required that each student choose one of five state-sanctioned religions when registering _ Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, Catholic or Protestant. Gibbs said he wasn’t sure why the document had Obama listed as a Muslim.

“Senator Obama has never been a Muslim,” Gibbs said. “As a six-year-old in Catholic school, he studied the catechism.”

Well with that folks, I think Barack Hussein Obama is a liar. He’s had his team issue a statement that he was never a Muslim, but there is well documented proof that he entered school as a Muslim. Also Mr. Kuhner noted, that Barack Hussein was given a traditional Muslim name and Muslim fathers declare their children to be Muslim at birth. So this brings back that whole matter of him possibly being called an apostate from Islam, by those who practice “pure Islam”. Which would mean they would seek to have him killed. You can’t exactly mediate the Middle East crisis when one side has yet another reason to want you dead.

Regarding Obama’s claims of the Christian faith, Jeff at RightFaith has found that Obama really does not know where he stands. I can tell you for a fact, that his claims of the term “evangelical” somehow being “blurred” at “traditional Black churches” is bogus. He just said that to a person he knew had no knowledge of Black churches to shut them down. I’ve only been in churches surrounded by Black people my entire life. And I recall when devout Christians were called “fundamentalist”, now the term used by the media has changed to “evangelical”. Given today’s Liberals dislike Christians who actually evangelize, seek to bring converts to our faith and tell groups like the pro-choice crowd that they need to stop doing something that is sinful. Throughout all the name changes, regardless the race, devout Christians know who the media is talking about, because they know where they stand regarding their faith and values. I recall when I was young, an unsaved friend of mine addressed me as a Christian fundamentalist, because that’s the term that was used in those days. Now how could 2 young Black kids understand such a basic term, but Obama claims it’s blurred at Black churches? Don’t believe him.

And Obama is “not sure” about some passages in the Bible. I sure would like to know exactly which passages he might take issue with.

Given Obama’s waffling, I can’t help but wonder if his claim to Christianity is simply politically motivated. It’s not like he would be unique, but just another lying politician that plays on faith for votes.

Hear audio clips of Kuhner and Hannity using the link below.
Insight Magazine’s Jeffrey T. Kuhner and Sean Hannity talk about Obama and Hillary – MP3 Audio (Size: 2.89 MB)
(If linking, please link to this post, not the media file. For the sake of bandwidth there will be no other formats made.)

January 25, 2007

Mike Nifong…Going Down!

by @ 4:31 pm. Filed under Nuts on Parade

Suspects Finally he’s being held to account for his actions.

Former Duke Lacrosse ‘Rape’ Prosecutor Charged With Withholding Evidence, Misleading Court – FoxNews.com – 1/24/2007

RALEIGH, N.C. ? Former Duke lacrosse rape prosecutor Mike Nifong has been slapped with additional ethics charges by the state bar association, which has accused him of withholding DNA evidence and making misleading statements to the court.

The new charges by the North Carolina State Bar against Durham County District Attorney Mike Nifong were announced Wednesday and could lead to his removal from the state bar, according to a copy of the updated complaint. Nifong last year indicted three men from the Duke lacrosse team on charges that they raped a stripper at an off-campus party in March of 2006.

The bar complaint alleges those results weren’t released to defense lawyers in a timely fashion and that Nifong repeatedly said in court he had turned over all evidence that would potentially benefit the defense.

Nifong’s actions constitute a “systematic abuse of prosecutorial discretion … prejudicial to the administration of justice,” the complaint read.

The amended ethics complaint filed Wednesday points out 11 instances between May and mid-December when Nifong said in court or in court filings that he knew of no additional exculpatory evidence, additional results from DNA testing or conversations with the DNA experts that would help the defense.

But according to the bar complaint, testing conducted at DNA Security Inc. had concluded by April 10 that none of the samples provided to police by 46 lacrosse players matched any material recovered from the accuser’s “rape kit.” A week later, Nifong charged Collin Finnerty and Reade Seligmann with rape.

Meanwhile, the Raleigh News and Observer reported Wednesday that with the North Carolina attorney general reviewing the Duke lacrosse case, the new prosecutors must weigh evidence gathered by Nifong’s chief investigator, whose private detective career was marked by ethics complaints.

Click here to read the News and Observer story

Nifong hired Linwood E. Wilson, a gospel singer with limited experience working criminal cases, less than four months before the March 13 lacrosse team party at which the accuser claims the assault took place.

When will the stripper accuser that I feel is a liar be held to account for her part in this mess?

I’m Not Upset Wolf Blitzer Asked Dick Cheney a Personal Question. (Audio)

by @ 12:03 pm. Filed under Audio, Questionable Items

So Republicans are pretty upset that Wolf Blitzer asked Vice President Dick Cheney about his lesbian daughter getting herself pregnant, to intentionally raise a child in a gay household. See the video of Blitzer asking the question over at Hot Air, where Republicans are having a tizzy.

Well I don’t have a problem with Wolf asking the question. I do feel Wolf should have left it alone after Dick Cheney said “no”, but it’s a more than reasonable question. Considering the Republican Party tries to claim to be a party of faith and values. They ensure that their campaigning targets Christians and our concerns. Not to mention they play up some issues to get our support. When such a group is courting Christians, while their own leaders are not reflecting our values in their own lives, that’s a question worthy of the media bringing up. Dick Cheney is a VERY high ranking member in the party, as US Vice President. His daughter who is doing this is a major campaigner for their party.

Also, when Liberals are asked personal questions by the media, the people upset now have nothing to say. I’ve mentioned how Barack Hussein Obama was basically asked if he was a hypocrite for sending his kids to private school, while being against school vouchers (school choice). I feel that question was perfectly reasonable, although it involved Obama’s own kids and when Liberals are hit with personal questions nobody outside of the Democratic party complains. Anyone can choose not to answer a question, however I don’t fault a member of the media for asking personal questions when they relate to politics and policy.

This is not the same as a member of the US Senate playing on someone’s personal life in an effort to humiliate them.

Conservatives and Republicans had no problem when former Vice President Dan Quayle lashed out at the TV Show Murphy Brown, for showing a woman intentionally taking action to raise a baby without a husband. When Republicans attack others for raising children out of wedlock all the Conservatives and Republicans are happy. But when a Republican is asked about their own family conflict in this area there is wailing from Republicans.

I feel this is yet another example of what separates Republicans from Independent Conservatives like myself. While we Independent Conservatives often find issues in common with Republicans, we ICs are not going to play double standards on issues like this.

So in my efforts to express my concerns about this double standard, I called the Kevin Miller morning show to explain my thoughts. I am glad I was given the opportunity to share my thoughts there. I recorded the call and you can check it out.

Hear it using the audio link below.
Me calling Kevin Miller about Wolf Blitzer and Dick Cheney – MP3 Audio (Size: 647 KB)
(If linking, please link to this post, not the media file. For the sake of bandwidth there will be no other formats made.)


update 1/25/2007 12:24PM:
Greg over at The Political Pit Bull agrees that the question its self was not out of line, although he understands why it might tick Dick off.

Independent Conservative - Copyright 2008 - Copyright Notice

[powered by WordPress.]

32 queries. 0.301 seconds