Allow me to explain why I feel the following is simply ridiculous.

Black NY protesters march 5th Ave over shooting

NEW YORK (Reuters) – Black New Yorkers angry over the police shooting death of a groom on his wedding day marched down Fifth Ave…

The man was a member and claims are he is still a member of the Black Panthers. The original Black Panthers have several of their members in prison for killing or trying to kill cops. Also their member Assata Shakur is being given safe haven by Cast…

That certainly seems to be the case and maybe a part of that might be that black cops, like black Conservatives are treated as de facto whites by Liberals both black and white.

Barron and Sharpton are no good, period.

You will never see them calling for a rally when a Black cop is killed. Never do you see their faces at the funeral of a Black cop.

The cop claims he followed the group to their car, identified himself as a cop and was brushed back by their car and fired after he saw Guzman reach into his waistband.

Who’s telling the truth? What is the truth here?

Hopefully that’ll all come out in the investigation. Internal Affairs is notoriously tough on cops. Cops have lost their jobs even after being cleared of criminal actions, based on procedural errors.

It’s highly doubtful that a group of plainclothes cops, 2 blacks, 2 whites and 1 Hispanic went out that night looking to harm black men. Why would two black cops be involved in that kind of conspiracy? Why would anyone???

Worse yet is the fact that Charles Barron implies “white cops shot unarmed blacks,” when white cops comprised just 40% of the police involved in that shooting.

Charles Barron is a very dangerous man. A former Black Panther, filled with racial animus, who is now a City Councilman. He is a shameless hater and is as vile a racist and racial bigot as Michael Richards, but with more political power.

Oddly enough, there was no such outcry a few weeks ago, when an off-duty black cop shot and killed a black thug who was holding a gun to another black man’s head, in Brooklyn. When the cop ID’d himself the gun wielding thug wheeled around and fired striking the police oficer once in the ankle and once in the buttocks, but the cop was able to squeeze off three shots hitting the thug in the chest and killing him.

I guess the demographics weren’t as good for demagoguery in that instance.

You’d think that if the likes of Sharpton and Barron really were interested in justice, they’d want to be kept abreast of the investigation, instead of merely looking to incite a riot.

Sharpton is another very unstable character. I’ve heard so much about his “changing his ways” in the wake of the Tawanna Brawley hoax, but that’s wishful thinking, in my view.

Worse than the Brawley affair was his post-Brawley inciting of a near-riot in Harlem over Freddy’s, a Jewish owned clothing and sporting goods store that had its rent raised by Freddy’s black landlord. Freddy rented a portion of his rented portion of the building to another tenant and raised that rent to help defray the costs of his increase.

Sharpton moved in calling Freddy’s “a white interloper,” and implying that he such merchants were “chasing black merchants out of Harlem.” He incited a number of youths to violent protest and one man eventually set fire to Freddy’s killing, of course, five minority employees, who were working there at the time.

If Sharpton’s “changed his ways” any, it’s for the worse, in my view.

That doesn’t mean I think this is a good shoot, I have no way of knowing that, only that we’ll have to see what the evidence and the investigation bring out here.