Fire and Hammer says all that needs to be said about this one.

I needed some gas yesterday and intentionally by-passed a 7-Eleven Citgo station for their neighboring competitor. I look forward to buying some 7-Eleven branded gas after they make the switch. The folks at 7-Eleven say it’s not because of Hugo’s comments that they are making this change, but made sure they would not be associated with Hugo’s comments.

If others pumping Citgo gas would also allow their agreements with Citgo to expire, they won’t have to continue crying that people like myself are hurting them. Besides if I go to Citgo, I’d be hurting another gas station that wants my money .

It’s MY CHOICE TO MAKE and I’ll support the money hungry businessman that keeps his mouth shut, over a company led by a madman!

Related post: Michael Savage Rips Hugo Chavez and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Promotes Boycott of Citgo! (Audio)

Regarding Bill Clinton’s insanity and criticism of the war on terror. Which is really a war against the most orthodox form of the cult known as Islam.

Reader Ron_B offers this piece of wisdom.

…
In my view the 8 MONTHS THEY DID NOTHING CHARGE does not stand to reason. Here are the multiple ways using Left wing talking points to dismiss it
…
2) If the Intel report that came out said that US Military action has enraged Muslims around the world and thus increased the threat of terrorism what do the opponents think that killing Osama during this critical 8 months would have done and thus they are talking out of both sides of their necks
…

Yes sir they are!

And it’s amazing to hear Bill Clinton say how he would have handled things if he were President now. Given he never sent troops to actually wage war against Islamic radicals during his 8 years in office. The only time he came close was after the unfortunate 1993 Black Hawk Down incident. Which was an extraction mission and not an actual military assault on the enemy. Even after that incident, the US did not carry out a major follow up attack.

Look at the list of major attacks against the US and US interests, by followers of orthodox Islam (maybe you call it radical Islam) during the Clinton years:

• 1993 – World Trade Center Bombing. Resulted in no attack against any state sponsor of terrorism.
• 1993 – Black Hawk Down incident. Resulted in no attack against any state sponsor of terrorism.
• 1996 – Bombing of the Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia. Resulted in no attack against any state sponsor of terrorism.
• 1998 – The twin bombing of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. Resulted in missiles fired into Afghanistan and Sudan. No military effort made to remove the leaders of those nations and eliminate their sponsorship of terrorists. No troops committed to fighting in those nations.

  So the state sponsors were not removed and no effort was made to remove the leaders of these nations for their part in sponsoring terrorism.

• 2000 – The USS Cole bombing. Resulted in no attack against any state sponsor of terrorism.

Bill Clinton made very little effort to take down the state sponsors of terrorism, after the many attacks on our nation. But now he claims he would have done so much more in Afghanistan. I doubt it, given his lax record. He says he would not have done so much in Iraq. I have no doubt he would have done nothing in Iraq or to any other state sponsor of terrorism, other than to fire some missiles and leave it at that. It was because of weak responses by people like Bill Clinton, that Islamists were led to feel the US had no stomach to take the fight to the enemy.

For a change, the USA is going after 2 state sponsors of terrorism, Afghanistan and Iraq. A war that is going to have to expand in order to truly defeat Islamists.

Remember his “you don’t want to go there” statement to the late Peter Jennings? Hot Air has the flashback video!

There was that pointing finger once again!

Yup ABC and FoxNews must be allied forces in the Vast Right Winged Conspiracy .

Related post: Chris Wallace on Bill Clinton Going Insane on National TV! (Audio)

The news of London cops submitting to informing Muslims about upcoming terror raids is simply a terrible idea. The Dhimmitude train continues to roll right over them. Tel-Chai Nation has all the details about this insanity.

The idea of a raid, is to capture suspects when they least suspect it. Telling anyone outside of law enforcement information about an upcoming raid will only result in leaks and suspects either getting away or hiding evidence that would be used to prosecute them. In the case of Muslim radicals, you can’t say you really know who might decide to tip off their Islamist “brothers”, while posing as someone trying to help. What if the Muslim informed of a raid feels a greater loyalty to a fellow Muslim than police they view as infidels? Respected names in the Muslim world have made it known they think very lowly of non-Muslims.

Everyone knows Osama bin Laden sides with the Sunni Muslims. On the other side of the major Muslim coin (Shia) is Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani. He is a highly respected Muslim leader. Here is what he says about non-Muslims on his own web site.

Najis are things he has declared to be unclean under Islam. #8 Kafir is YOU IF YOU ARE NOT A MUSLIM.

Even the top Muslim leader on the side that the US has supposedly been working with sees you on the same level as literal crap.

Given this, I can’t agree with the view that there is some “mainstream Muslim” view that is moderate. Given the words that spew from the mouths of the most respected Muslim leaders in the Muslim world it is more than apparently obvious, that the “mainstream Muslim” view looks down upon the West. They’ve said it in no uncertain terms. So I’m not looking to some “mainstream Muslim majority” to counter the threat. Those Muslims who really are against the ways of radicals are as Walid Shoebat mentioned, a pack that is weak in numbers. They are the minority and the radicals can find much more support in their so-called holy books for their view, than the Liberal (sometimes called Moderate) Muslims have been able to muster. Because the fact is Muhammad went from talking about peace (when he did not have the numbers to attack others), to being a man of all out war and aggression, to subjugate non-Muslims, with particular emphasis on Christians and Jews. So radicals have more support for their views when they look at how the founder of their cult lived out his own life.

The changes in London may soon be the policy across England. Pray the Lord grants wisdom, to prevent nations from turning themselves over to the hands of their enemies.

I think one caller into Sean Hannity’s show said it best, when they mentioned that Clinton’s emotional ranting with Chris Wallace, looked similar to his “I did not have sexual relations with that woman” plea, back when he was President. Notice in both cases, he had a blood flushed face, slamming his hand and pointing his finger. For Bill Clinton, video tape is like a form of lie detector. He gets angry every time he’s asked a sensitive question related to something he is trying to cover up!

Yesterday, Sean Hannity interview Chris Wallace about Clinton’s meltdown. Chris agreed that Clinton got unhinged, he said “unplugged”. He mentioned there were even more fireworks off camera. Clinton’s Communications Director Jay Carson was trying to end the interview and after the interview Clinton was yelling at his staff.

Wallace described former President William Jefferson Clinton’s meltdown as:

being at the foot of a mountain and seeing an avalanche come down at you

Mr. Wallace mentioned, that he asks tough questions to “both sides” and he’s right. FoxNews hating Liberals may not know this because they probably don’t watch much FoxNews, but Chris Wallace hits everybody with hard questions. Hot Air has been covering the Clinton meltdown from various angles and has discovered, that Chris Wallace asked Donald Rumsfeld the same question in 2004. Hot Air also has some video of fact checking, that exposes Clinton’s lies. They also have this nice piece about it all. I’ve exposed Bill Clinton in posts here and here.

The bottom line is this. After an attack on George W. Bush’s watch, Bush responded with words like “with us or against us”, so other nations knew they better let us into Afghanistan. Clinton cries about how he could not get help from other nations. The biggest military exercise carried out by Bill Clinton actually helped Islamic radicals. And we may never know the full details about that, now that Slobodan Milosevic is dead.

Hot Air also has coverage of Pakistan’s President being upset that the Bush Administration came down hard on him after 9/11. With all the terrorist bombings on Clinton’s watch, instead of pressing Pakistan, his Administration was afraid to do anything that might cause unrest there.

Wallace mentioned that he was trying to get Clinton to move on with the interview and asked Bubba 4 times if he wanted to divert to the Clinton Global Initiative, but Clinton kept harping and could not let it go. Wallace said:

He could not control himself.

Clinton floated a conspiracy theory, that Wallace was trying to cover that Rupert Murdock supports Clinton’s Global Initiative. Like most businessmen, Murdock greases players in both major political parties. And we know it’s not necessarily because he agrees with them, but because he wants to maintain favor with them.

Chris Wallace started with FoxNews in 2003, well after the USS Cole bombing. Not to mention well after 9/11. So of course he has not asked people about the USS Cole much. Especially given it happened on Bill Clinton’s watch.

Clinton’s people fed a story to the Liberal blogs before the interview even aired! They knew Bubba made a fool of himself.

Mr. Wallace also mentioned that Clinton’s thumb was trembling. That old lie detector had Bubba falling apart! Good thing it was not a 1 hour interview. Who knows what Clinton might have done!

Chris Wallace said he never had something like this happen before, especially from a former President.

Can you imagine what the media response would be if President George W. Bush and his staff responded like this every time he is asked a tough question?

Later during the program, Sean Hannity mentioned that Richard Clarke said that NO PLAN was passed from the Clinton to Bush Administration to get Osama bin Laden. He mentioned that Sandy Berger said the same.

DL Foster mentions what Bill Clinton was REALLY OBSESSED WITH!

Hear Hannity and Wallace using the audio link below.
Sean Hannity and Chris Wallace discuss President William Jefferson Clinton?s meltdown – ASF Audio
(If linking, please link to this post, not the audio file. For the sake of bandwidth there will be no other formats made.)