Comments on: Chris Wallace on Bill Clinton Going Insane on National TV! (Audio)

By: Independent Conservative

Independent Conservative — Thu, 28 Sep 2006 04:28:32 +0000

What Clinton Would Have Done…

Regarding Bill Clinton’s insanity and criticism of the war on terror. Which is really a war against the most orthodox form of the cult known as Islam.
Reader Ron_B offers this piece of wisdom.

…
In my view the 8 MONTHS THEY DID NOTHIN…

By: Independent Conservative

Independent Conservative — Thu, 28 Sep 2006 03:26:38 +0000

Flashback: Was ABC Doing a Conservative Hit Job on Bill Clinton Too?

Remember his “you don’t want to go there” statement to the late Peter Jennings? Hot Air has the flashback video!
There was that pointing finger once again!
Yup ABC and FoxNews must be allied forces in the Vast Right Winged Conspir…

By: Ron_B

Ron_B — Thu, 28 Sep 2006 02:10:19 +0000

You have to give credit to Bill Clinton. He knows how to first lay out an ARBITRARY construct and then challenge his adversary on it.

In my view the 8 MONTHS THEY DID NOTHING CHARGE does not stand to reason. Here are the multiple ways using Left wing talking points to dismiss it

1) The PNAC plan was said to be in the works since early 1990. If this plan the governing document for the Democrats why are they saying that Bush did not do anything during the 8 months. Then again if you listen to Dick Greogory – bush was busy planning to fly the planes into the WTC at this time

2) If the Intel report that came out said that US Military action has enraged Muslims around the world and thus increased the threat of terrorism what do the opponents think that killing Osama during this critical 8 months would have done and thus they are talking out of both sides of their necks

3) If Osama was dead already do you think that the Global Jihadists would stop their fight? WHY IS OSAMA BEING USED AS THE BOGIE BY BOTH ADMINISTRATIONS? He is only one man.

4) To make the case that the TERROR THREAT IS UP is a SHALLOW CLAIM. Is it our job to MAKE THE MUSLIMS WHO MIGHT STRIKE US HAPPY SO THEY WON’T OR IS IT TO DEMONSTRATE THE CONSEQUENCES OF ATTACKING THE UNITED STATES?

By: brooklyn

brooklyn — Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:07:43 +0000

Between Clinton’s response to the ABC 9/11 docu-drama and his explosion over Wallace’s question it makes you wonder if the Clintons would be in favor of rolling back our freedom of speech?

By: brooklyn

brooklyn — Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:05:24 +0000

I couldn’t help but notice how Clinton attacked and accused Wallace PERSONALLY for having the nerve to as such a question. Clinton displayed the typical liberal “destroy the messanger instead of the message” tactic.

Clinton for the longest time kept saying he had no reason/means/charges with which to bring Bon Laden in but in his Fox interview he kept saying he TRIED to kill Bin Laden…

Really? For what?

Wasn’t Clinton just saying last year that he had no charges against Bin Laden, now he wants me to believe he was always trying to kill him.

Huh???