So you’ve probably already heard about the Liberal harping over the ABC movie Path to 9/11. Funny how they ran with the lies of Michael Moore, but now they want to attack ABC over a movie that as Michael Savage says, was “not Liberal enough”. Nevermind that Bill Clinton really was tied up in scandal and really did turn down opportunities to both capture and kill Osama bin Laden. You’re supposed to believe all his excuses and not hold him accountable for passing over opportunities to capture and kill the man behind:
- 1996 - Bombing of the Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia.
- 1998 - The twin bombing of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania.
- 2000 - The USS Cole bombing.
- 9/11/2001 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center, Pentagon, plus the crashed planes.
Notice most of the events took place on Clinton’s watch, but Clinton never seemed to muster the guts to actually capture or kill bin Laden at some of the most opportune moments.
Mark Levin exposed the Clinton cover-up. He covered the writeup below from the Los Angeles Times, by Mansoor Ijaz back in 2001. Ijaz is a Westernized Muslim, who worked for Clinton. He tried to serve up bin Laden on numerous occasions. On top of that, his work provided opportunities to gather intelligence on some 9/11 terrorists.
Clinton Let Bin Laden Slip Away and Metastasize
…
In May 1996, the Sudanese capitulated to U.S. pressure and asked Bin Laden to leave, despite their feeling that he could be monitored better in Sudan than elsewhere.
Bin Laden left for Afghanistan, taking with him Ayman Zawahiri, considered by the U.S. to be the chief planner of the Sept. 11 attacks; Mamdouh Mahmud Salim, who traveled frequently to Germany to obtain electronic equipment for Al Qaeda; Wadih El-Hage, Bin Laden’s personal secretary and roving emissary, now serving a life sentence in the U.S. for his role in the 1998 U.S. embassy bombings in Tanzania and Kenya; and Fazul Abdullah Mohammed and Saif Adel, also accused of carrying out the embassy attacks.
Some of these men are now among the FBI’s 22 most-wanted terrorists.
The two men who allegedly piloted the planes into the twin towers, Mohamed Atta and Marwan Al-Shehhi, prayed in the same Hamburg mosque as did Salim and Mamoun Darkazanli, a Syrian trader who managed Salim’s bank accounts and whose assets are frozen.
Important data on each had been compiled by the Sudanese.
But U.S. authorities repeatedly turned the data away, first in February 1996; then again that August, when at my suggestion Sudan’s religious ideologue, Hassan Turabi, wrote directly to Clinton; then again in April 1997, when I persuaded Bashir to invite the FBI to come to Sudan and view the data; and finally in February 1998, when Sudan’s intelligence chief, Gutbi al-Mahdi, wrote directly to the FBI.
Gutbi had shown me some of Sudan’s data during a three-hour meeting in Khartoum in October 1996. When I returned to Washington, I told Berger and his specialist for East Africa, Susan Rice, about the data available. They said they’d get back to me. They never did. Neither did they respond when Bashir made the offer directly. I believe they never had any intention to engage Muslim countries–ally or not. Radical Islam, for the administration, was a convenient national security threat.
…
|
So first Clinton would not take bin Laden, but asked Sudan to kick him out. Did he think bin Laden would go and sin no more? Clinton claims he had nothing to take bin Laden into custody on, but we know he could have if he really wanted him. Everybody knows bin Laden’s terrorist organization is involved in the drug trade. Drug charges have been used to lock up plenty of people. Why not bin Laden?
When there was nothing to charge Al Capone with, the government figured out a way to get him! Why didn’t Clinton claim bin Laden failed to pay some taxes 
?
Mr. Levin also discussed how Clinton lawyers wanted to keep bin Laden comfortable if they ever did capture him. And this is true, although you’d think it was totally made up!
Clinton Lawyers Fretted Over bin Laden’s Comfort
The CIA’s former bin Laden desk chief revealed Thursday night that Clinton administration lawyers warned counterterrorism agents that Osama bin Laden had to be kept as comfortable as possible if they captured him during planned raids into Afghanistan.
…
“We had to build an ergonomically designed chair to put him in, [for] special comfort in terms of how he was shackled into the chair,” Scheuer explained. “They even worried about what kind of tape to gag him with so it wouldn’t irritate his beard.”
…
“We had at least eight to 10 chances to capture or kill Osama bin Laden in 1998 and 1999. And the government on all occasions decided that the information was not good enough to act,” he claimed.
…
|
The bottom line is that Clinton and his cronies are trying to continually cover-up the fact they let bin Laden get away.
Hear Mark Levin using the audio link below.
Mark Levin on Clinton’s failures related to the Path to 9/11 - WMA Audio
(If linking, please link to this post, not the audio file. For the sake of bandwidth there will be no other formats made.)
September 9th, 2006 at 12:54 am
Hannity Speaks to “The Path to 9/11″ Writer Cyrus Nowrasteh
The movie The Path to 9/11 is still causing a stir. Can you imagine if Republicans in Congress spoke out against Michael Moore’s lies like this, before his garbage was released? Given media companies are regulated by the government, having go…
September 26th, 2006 at 12:02 am
Chris Wallace on Bill Clinton Going Insane on National TV! (Audio)
I think one caller into Sean Hannity’s show said it best, when they mentioned that Clinton’s emotional ranting with Chris Wallace, looked similar to his “I did not have sexual relations with that woman” plea, back when he was P…