He’s been busted and he knows it! Here’s the statement on his old campaign web site. (He’s already taken down his congressional web site.)

“Today I have delivered a letter to the Speaker of the House informing him of my decision to resign from the U.S. House of Representatives, effective today. I thank the people of Florida’s 16th Congressional District for giving me the opportunity to serve them for the last twelve years; it has been an honor.

“I am deeply sorry and I apologize for letting down my family and the people of Florida I have had the privilege to represent.”

La Shawn Barber already has good coverage of this mess.

Foley was the chairman of the House Caucus on Missing and Exploited Children, but was sending children instant message exchanges like the following:

And that my friends is solicitation of a minor.

OK, since he seems to like sending nasty messages to young boys (and probably more), will the “he was born that way” defense work? Notice how sick that question sounds when relating it to children. Immediately everyone realizes the born that way line is bogus. Which means everyone knows that everybody really can CHOOSE to control their bodies.

Foley is sick and his prescribed treatment should be life in prison with hard labor.

And since Foley is a Republican, the leaders of that party including President Bush should go on record denouncing this debased activity. Let history mark that this action was denounced loudly and without reservation.

Related post: Does God Make Mistakes? Does God Make Imperfect People?

Here’s an interesting thought, just what would American Liberals say about American Conservative Evangelical Christians, if American Conservative Evangelical Christians:

• Said it was a “blessing” for men in their 50’s to marry girls under 10 years old?
• Felt God wanted a man to have 2, 3 or even 4 wives?
• Felt that God instructed husbands to beat their wives?
• Felt God said that a women found in indecency could be raped and/or murdered?
• Denied women an education?
• Forced women to cover everything but their hands and eyes, while men were allowed to wear ordinary street clothing?
• Felt it was God’s will that a woman’s testimony was worth less than a man’s in court?
• Felt it was God’s will to kill or subjugate all who refused to confess the Christian faith?
• Had dreams of young male slaves and virgins to use at will in heaven?
• Wanted to murder all who make any disfavorable expression against the Christian faith, like artists that mock Christ?
• Wanted to murder all who left the Christian faith?
• Wanted to murder all gays?
• Felt a higher place in heaven was guaranteed if killed while trying to take the lives of anyone who resists the Christian faith?
• Felt any modern day agreements (real estate or otherwise) made with non-Christians were not binding?
• Equated non-Christians with excrement?
• Endorsed modern day slavery?
• Felt every land ever ruled by a Christian should be taken from any non-Christian rulers by force and desire to take the entire world for the Christian faith via force?

American Conservative Evangelical Christians are not endorsing any of the statements above. But just imagine what Liberals would say if that were the case. We see how efforts are made to attack the Christian faith, while Christians detest all of the items mentioned above. On the other hand, orthodox Muslims and their leaders endorse every item listed above. And for any Christian to even raise this issue is considered “hate speech”.

Now given Liberals’ attitude towards American Conservative Evangelical Christians, how much greater should their attitude be towards the most orthodox followers of Islam? If their claims against Conservative Christians were rooted in some sort of true moral conviction, wouldn’t they cry even louder towards the most orthodox of Muslims and their leaders? Wouldn’t they demand that groups like CAIR have female spokespeople? Instead of pressing for areas like the Palestinian territory to have a state, being human shields in Iraq, going to speak with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and claiming the US is not an honest broker with Muslims, wouldn’t Liberals press and hold Muslim lands to their high goals of “human and civil rights”? Wouldn’t they hold massive protest marches about the human rights violations taking place in Muslim lands? Wouldn’t they count the number of deaths at the hands of Muslim laws and place those numbers on their t-shirts? And given the atrocities in Muslim lands, wouldn’t their outcry be directly primarily towards orthodox Muslims lands rather than America?

Remember this the next time you see Liberals fighting to remove a Cross or the 10 Commandments from the public square.

Related post: Islam is Incompatible With the West! Even the Pentagon Knows. (Audio)

And this is why I usually read and initial every page in multi-page legal documents.

Doe vs. Bolton was ruled on the same day as the original Roe v. Wade case.

Keep in mind Norma McCorvey, the original “Jane Roe” is now Pro-Life.

Hat tip Michael Savage.

Maybe I should start a new category on this blog called “Things the President Won’t Tell You”. This would be a fitting entry.

The Defense News article provides many more details.

The USA is trying to get China to help with threats like North Korea, but between this and issues of trade, this gives China all the advantages. While China continues to fuel our Islamic enemies, on top of the fact China is not our friend either.

So I’ve been showing you why in repeated posts and Michael Savage said it yesterday. Islam is simply not compatible with Western society. Even devout Muslims know this, because whenever you view a Muslim web site that defends actions we Westerners feel are insane, they start with statements about not looking at things with a Western view. The Muslim nations with a shred of decency have been influenced by the West. And some of the talk about Muslims making great achievements in math and science are bogus. No group goes from making great advances in science and math, to living like nomads. However, if the Muslim raiders obtained information from people in lands they overtook, this fully explains why Muslim lands look pretty backwards when separated from Christian and Jewish lands that are making advances in areas like science and math. Because Islam suppresses efforts to advance. It does not promote them like Christianity. Robert Spencer fills in some of the details in his book The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades). Mr. Spencer has a new book out titled The Truth About Muhammad: Founder of the World’s Most Intolerant Religion. I can’t wait to get my hands on that!!!

So here’s my list of reasons why Islam is not compatible with the Western world. If I thought about it longer, this list would probably contain more, but we’ll go with this for now.

Islam is not compatible with the West because of Islam’s:

• Hatred of Israel (Jews) and anything not Muslim, that attempts to exists near orthodox Muslims.
• Child brides. Because Mohammed took a child bride who he married when she was age 6 and slept with when she turned age 9 and he was age 52. Many Muslims feel such activity is endorsed by God. Nobody else is seeking out children as some action endorsed by their faith. Unless you treat NAMBLA as a faith.

  Regardless of what was common in the Middle Ages, this is the view of modern day Muslims and the Muslim world.

• Polygamy
• Physical abuse of the wives.
• Making women dress like mummies.
• Keeping Women in a forced lower status, with things like female court testimony being less acceptable than a man’s, simply because of gender.
• Desire to subjugate or kill Christians, Jews and all who are not Muslim.
• Slavery.

  The Koran speaks of YOUNG male slaves/servants in heaven.

• Efforts to kill critics of Islam.
• Murder of converts from Islam.
• Murder of gays.
• Guarantee of heaven by blowing themselves up in the name of defending Islam.

Of course you might say you know a Muslim who is not like that, but I would venture to say that Muslim is Westernized and not orthodox. The list above is endorsed in Muslim controlled parts of the world that are free of Western influence. And even many Muslims in America seem not to have their wives out much. It’s interesting how many Muslim men keep their wife/wives in the house and if they come out the women must dress like mummies, while the man often wears regular clothing. Even in the Islamist front group (my opinion of them) CAIR you only see men speaking for that organization.

The actions listed above are in the Koran and other Islamic books, that Muslims feel are holy. Despite the appalling things in the Koran, Muslims feel it was written by Allah and given to Mohammed. And it’s not like the Bible, which has a New Testament that reforms some things contained in the Old Testament. The violence in Islam comes later in Mohammed’s life and is in the Koran.

You don’t have to believe me when I say orthodox Islam is the problem. The Pentagon has spent plenty of your tax dollars to come to basically the same conclusion, regarding what are called Islamic radicals. I just call them orthodox followers of Islam, because that is what they are. The most orthodox followers of the cult.

(Please read all of that.)

In Dr. Savage’s talk about Islam being incompatible with the West, he calls for reform in Islam. Given how Muslims feel about the Koran, I don’t think that will ever happen. It is constructed to have the worse parts in the later parts of Muhammad’s life. After he did all his dirt, so he could claim it was all ordained by “Allah”. This causes those parts to supersede any earlier teachings. Just as the Bible’s New Testament supersedes any contrary teachings from the Old Testament.

Hear Michael Savage using the audio link below.
Dr. Michael Savage on how Islam is incompatible with the Western World - MP3 Audio
(If linking, please link to this post, not the audio file. For the sake of bandwidth there will be no other formats made.)

Fire and Hammer says all that needs to be said about this one.

I needed some gas yesterday and intentionally by-passed a 7-Eleven Citgo station for their neighboring competitor. I look forward to buying some 7-Eleven branded gas after they make the switch. The folks at 7-Eleven say it’s not because of Hugo’s comments that they are making this change, but made sure they would not be associated with Hugo’s comments.

If others pumping Citgo gas would also allow their agreements with Citgo to expire, they won’t have to continue crying that people like myself are hurting them. Besides if I go to Citgo, I’d be hurting another gas station that wants my money .

It’s MY CHOICE TO MAKE and I’ll support the money hungry businessman that keeps his mouth shut, over a company led by a madman!

Related post: Michael Savage Rips Hugo Chavez and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Promotes Boycott of Citgo! (Audio)

Regarding Bill Clinton’s insanity and criticism of the war on terror. Which is really a war against the most orthodox form of the cult known as Islam.

Reader Ron_B offers this piece of wisdom.

…
In my view the 8 MONTHS THEY DID NOTHING CHARGE does not stand to reason. Here are the multiple ways using Left wing talking points to dismiss it
…
2) If the Intel report that came out said that US Military action has enraged Muslims around the world and thus increased the threat of terrorism what do the opponents think that killing Osama during this critical 8 months would have done and thus they are talking out of both sides of their necks
…

Yes sir they are!

And it’s amazing to hear Bill Clinton say how he would have handled things if he were President now. Given he never sent troops to actually wage war against Islamic radicals during his 8 years in office. The only time he came close was after the unfortunate 1993 Black Hawk Down incident. Which was an extraction mission and not an actual military assault on the enemy. Even after that incident, the US did not carry out a major follow up attack.

Look at the list of major attacks against the US and US interests, by followers of orthodox Islam (maybe you call it radical Islam) during the Clinton years:

• 1993 - World Trade Center Bombing. Resulted in no attack against any state sponsor of terrorism.
• 1993 - Black Hawk Down incident. Resulted in no attack against any state sponsor of terrorism.
• 1996 - Bombing of the Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia. Resulted in no attack against any state sponsor of terrorism.
• 1998 - The twin bombing of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. Resulted in missiles fired into Afghanistan and Sudan. No military effort made to remove the leaders of those nations and eliminate their sponsorship of terrorists. No troops committed to fighting in those nations.

  So the state sponsors were not removed and no effort was made to remove the leaders of these nations for their part in sponsoring terrorism.

• 2000 - The USS Cole bombing. Resulted in no attack against any state sponsor of terrorism.

Bill Clinton made very little effort to take down the state sponsors of terrorism, after the many attacks on our nation. But now he claims he would have done so much more in Afghanistan. I doubt it, given his lax record. He says he would not have done so much in Iraq. I have no doubt he would have done nothing in Iraq or to any other state sponsor of terrorism, other than to fire some missiles and leave it at that. It was because of weak responses by people like Bill Clinton, that Islamists were led to feel the US had no stomach to take the fight to the enemy.

For a change, the USA is going after 2 state sponsors of terrorism, Afghanistan and Iraq. A war that is going to have to expand in order to truly defeat Islamists.

Remember his “you don’t want to go there” statement to the late Peter Jennings? Hot Air has the flashback video!

There was that pointing finger once again!

Yup ABC and FoxNews must be allied forces in the Vast Right Winged Conspiracy .

Related post: Chris Wallace on Bill Clinton Going Insane on National TV! (Audio)

The news of London cops submitting to informing Muslims about upcoming terror raids is simply a terrible idea. The Dhimmitude train continues to roll right over them. Tel-Chai Nation has all the details about this insanity.

The idea of a raid, is to capture suspects when they least suspect it. Telling anyone outside of law enforcement information about an upcoming raid will only result in leaks and suspects either getting away or hiding evidence that would be used to prosecute them. In the case of Muslim radicals, you can’t say you really know who might decide to tip off their Islamist “brothers”, while posing as someone trying to help. What if the Muslim informed of a raid feels a greater loyalty to a fellow Muslim than police they view as infidels? Respected names in the Muslim world have made it known they think very lowly of non-Muslims.

Everyone knows Osama bin Laden sides with the Sunni Muslims. On the other side of the major Muslim coin (Shia) is Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani. He is a highly respected Muslim leader. Here is what he says about non-Muslims on his own web site.

Najis are things he has declared to be unclean under Islam. #8 Kafir is YOU IF YOU ARE NOT A MUSLIM.

Even the top Muslim leader on the side that the US has supposedly been working with sees you on the same level as literal crap.

Given this, I can’t agree with the view that there is some “mainstream Muslim” view that is moderate. Given the words that spew from the mouths of the most respected Muslim leaders in the Muslim world it is more than apparently obvious, that the “mainstream Muslim” view looks down upon the West. They’ve said it in no uncertain terms. So I’m not looking to some “mainstream Muslim majority” to counter the threat. Those Muslims who really are against the ways of radicals are as Walid Shoebat mentioned, a pack that is weak in numbers. They are the minority and the radicals can find much more support in their so-called holy books for their view, than the Liberal (sometimes called Moderate) Muslims have been able to muster. Because the fact is Muhammad went from talking about peace (when he did not have the numbers to attack others), to being a man of all out war and aggression, to subjugate non-Muslims, with particular emphasis on Christians and Jews. So radicals have more support for their views when they look at how the founder of their cult lived out his own life.

The changes in London may soon be the policy across England. Pray the Lord grants wisdom, to prevent nations from turning themselves over to the hands of their enemies.

I think one caller into Sean Hannity’s show said it best, when they mentioned that Clinton’s emotional ranting with Chris Wallace, looked similar to his “I did not have sexual relations with that woman” plea, back when he was President. Notice in both cases, he had a blood flushed face, slamming his hand and pointing his finger. For Bill Clinton, video tape is like a form of lie detector. He gets angry every time he’s asked a sensitive question related to something he is trying to cover up!

Yesterday, Sean Hannity interview Chris Wallace about Clinton’s meltdown. Chris agreed that Clinton got unhinged, he said “unplugged”. He mentioned there were even more fireworks off camera. Clinton’s Communications Director Jay Carson was trying to end the interview and after the interview Clinton was yelling at his staff.

Wallace described former President William Jefferson Clinton’s meltdown as:

being at the foot of a mountain and seeing an avalanche come down at you

Mr. Wallace mentioned, that he asks tough questions to “both sides” and he’s right. FoxNews hating Liberals may not know this because they probably don’t watch much FoxNews, but Chris Wallace hits everybody with hard questions. Hot Air has been covering the Clinton meltdown from various angles and has discovered, that Chris Wallace asked Donald Rumsfeld the same question in 2004. Hot Air also has some video of fact checking, that exposes Clinton’s lies. They also have this nice piece about it all. I’ve exposed Bill Clinton in posts here and here.

The bottom line is this. After an attack on George W. Bush’s watch, Bush responded with words like “with us or against us”, so other nations knew they better let us into Afghanistan. Clinton cries about how he could not get help from other nations. The biggest military exercise carried out by Bill Clinton actually helped Islamic radicals. And we may never know the full details about that, now that Slobodan Milosevic is dead.

Hot Air also has coverage of Pakistan’s President being upset that the Bush Administration came down hard on him after 9/11. With all the terrorist bombings on Clinton’s watch, instead of pressing Pakistan, his Administration was afraid to do anything that might cause unrest there.

Wallace mentioned that he was trying to get Clinton to move on with the interview and asked Bubba 4 times if he wanted to divert to the Clinton Global Initiative, but Clinton kept harping and could not let it go. Wallace said:

He could not control himself.

Clinton floated a conspiracy theory, that Wallace was trying to cover that Rupert Murdock supports Clinton’s Global Initiative. Like most businessmen, Murdock greases players in both major political parties. And we know it’s not necessarily because he agrees with them, but because he wants to maintain favor with them.

Chris Wallace started with FoxNews in 2003, well after the USS Cole bombing. Not to mention well after 9/11. So of course he has not asked people about the USS Cole much. Especially given it happened on Bill Clinton’s watch.

Clinton’s people fed a story to the Liberal blogs before the interview even aired! They knew Bubba made a fool of himself.

Mr. Wallace also mentioned that Clinton’s thumb was trembling. That old lie detector had Bubba falling apart! Good thing it was not a 1 hour interview. Who knows what Clinton might have done!

Chris Wallace said he never had something like this happen before, especially from a former President.

Can you imagine what the media response would be if President George W. Bush and his staff responded like this every time he is asked a tough question?

Later during the program, Sean Hannity mentioned that Richard Clarke said that NO PLAN was passed from the Clinton to Bush Administration to get Osama bin Laden. He mentioned that Sandy Berger said the same.

DL Foster mentions what Bill Clinton was REALLY OBSESSED WITH!

Hear Hannity and Wallace using the audio link below.
Sean Hannity and Chris Wallace discuss President William Jefferson Clinton’s meltdown - ASF Audio
(If linking, please link to this post, not the audio file. For the sake of bandwidth there will be no other formats made.)