Rekjalhew

September 30, 2006

Florida Republican Congressman Mark Foley is a Nasty Hypocrite!

by @ 12:52 am. Filed under Nuts on Parade

He’s been busted and he knows it! Here’s the statement on his old campaign web site. (He’s already taken down his congressional web site.)

“Today I have delivered a letter to the Speaker of the House informing him of my decision to resign from the U.S. House of Representatives, effective today. I thank the people of Florida’s 16th Congressional District for giving me the opportunity to serve them for the last twelve years; it has been an honor.

“I am deeply sorry and I apologize for letting down my family and the people of Florida I have had the privilege to represent.”

La Shawn Barber already has good coverage of this mess.

Foley was the chairman of the House Caucus on Missing and Exploited Children, but was sending children instant message exchanges like the following:

House leader quits over explicit e-mails


The first e-mail messages to one male page, sexually suggestive but not explicit, were reported by ABC News on Thursday. Mr. Foley, a member of the House Republican leadership, dismissed them as “overly friendly” but not inappropriate.

But by Friday, other pages had come forward with more blatant instant messages. “What ya wearing?” Mr. Foley wrote to one, according to the network. “Tshirt and shorts,” the teenager responded. “Love to slip them off of you,” Mr. Foley replied.

And that my friends is solicitation of a minor.

OK, since he seems to like sending nasty messages to young boys (and probably more), will the “he was born that way” defense work? Notice how sick that question sounds when relating it to children. Immediately everyone realizes the born that way line is bogus. Which means everyone knows that everybody really can CHOOSE to control their bodies.

Foley is sick and his prescribed treatment should be life in prison with hard labor.

And since Foley is a Republican, the leaders of that party including President Bush should go on record denouncing this debased activity. Let history mark that this action was denounced loudly and without reservation.


Related post:
Does God Make Mistakes? Does God Make Imperfect People?

What Would Liberals Say About Conservative Evangelical Christians if?…

by @ 12:07 am. Filed under Evangelicals Under Attack

Here’s an interesting thought, just what would American Liberals say about American Conservative Evangelical Christians, if American Conservative Evangelical Christians:

American Conservative Evangelical Christians are not endorsing any of the statements above. But just imagine what Liberals would say if that were the case. We see how efforts are made to attack the Christian faith, while Christians detest all of the items mentioned above. On the other hand, orthodox Muslims and their leaders endorse every item listed above. And for any Christian to even raise this issue is considered “hate speech”.

Now given Liberals’ attitude towards American Conservative Evangelical Christians, how much greater should their attitude be towards the most orthodox followers of Islam? If their claims against Conservative Christians were rooted in some sort of true moral conviction, wouldn’t they cry even louder towards the most orthodox of Muslims and their leaders? Wouldn’t they demand that groups like CAIR have female spokespeople? Instead of pressing for areas like the Palestinian territory to have a state, being human shields in Iraq, going to speak with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and claiming the US is not an honest broker with Muslims, wouldn’t Liberals press and hold Muslim lands to their high goals of “human and civil rights”? Wouldn’t they hold massive protest marches about the human rights violations taking place in Muslim lands? Wouldn’t they count the number of deaths at the hands of Muslim laws and place those numbers on their t-shirts? And given the atrocities in Muslim lands, wouldn’t their outcry be directly primarily towards orthodox Muslims lands rather than America?

Remember this the next time you see Liberals fighting to remove a Cross or the 10 Commandments from the public square.


Related post:
Islam is Incompatible With the West! Even the Pentagon Knows. (Audio)

September 29, 2006

Mother Says ACLU Attorney Duped Her in Landmark 1973 Abortion Case. Claims She’s Pro-Life and Never Saw Papers Filed in Court.

by @ 6:21 pm. Filed under Judiciary

And this is why I usually read and initial every page in multi-page legal documents.

Woman says ACLU attorney pushed her to have abortion in landmark 1973 case

In a case being closely watched by conservatives, the Supreme Court plans to hear a suit to reverse the Doe vs. Bolton abortion decision in 1973.

Sandra Cano, the anonymous Doe and one of the women who sued for a legalized abortion, has argued that she never wanted an abortion. Instead, Ms. Cano said she was pushed into it by an aggressive American Civil Liberties Union attorney when she was a 22-year-old victim of an abusive husband with her three children in foster care.

In her affidavit to the U.S. District Court in New Jersey, Ms. Cano said she approached a legal aid office in Atlanta for help in regaining custody of her children and a divorce from her husband. She said she was taken advantage of by an “aggressive self-serving attorney, Margie Pitts Hames, the legal-aid attorney.”

Ms. Cano said she never signed an affidavit that said she did not want or could not care for another baby. The affidavit also raised the possibility that she might commit suicide.

“I am 99 percent certain that I did not sign this affidavit,”

Ms. Cano said. “I do not believe it is my signature on the affidavit, and Margie either forged my signature or slipped this document in with other papers while I was signing divorce papers. I never told Margie that I wanted an abortion. The facts stated in the affidavit in Doe v. Bolton are not true.”

Ms. Cano said her mother and the legal aid attorney tried to force her to have an abortion. She said she fled to Oklahoma and returned when she was assured that she would not have to undergo an abortion. Ms. Cano said she went to court where she was told by her attorney not to speak.

Years after the Supreme Court decision, Ms. Cano sued to open up her records, a move opposed by Ms. Pitts Hames. The records showed that Ms. Cano had applied for abortion, was rejected and then sued the state of Georgia, all of which she said was a lie.

Doe vs. Bolton was ruled on the same day as the original Roe v. Wade case.

Keep in mind Norma McCorvey, the original “Jane Roe” is now Pro-Life.

Hat tip Michael Savage.

China Fires Lasers Against US Spy Satellites.

by @ 3:50 pm. Filed under Terrorism and War

Maybe I should start a new category on this blog called “Things the President Won’t Tell You”. This would be a fitting entry.

Beijing secretly fires lasers to disable US satellites

China has secretly fired powerful laser weapons designed to disable American spy satellites by “blinding” their sensitive surveillance devices, it was reported yesterday.

The hitherto unreported attacks have been kept secret by the Bush administration for fear that it would damage attempts to co-opt China in diplomatic offensives against North Korea and Iran.

Sources told the military affairs publication Defense News that there had been a fierce internal battle within Washington over whether to make the attacks public. In the end, the Pentagon’s annual assessment of the growing Chinese military build-up barely mentioned the threat.

“After a contentious debate, the White House directed the Pentagon to limit its concern to one line,” Defense News said.

The document said that China could blind American satellites with a ground-based laser firing a beam of light to prevent spy photography as they pass over China.

The Defense News article provides many more details.

China Attempted To Blind U.S. Satellites With Laser

China has fired high-power lasers at U.S. spy satellites flying over its territory in what experts see as a test of Chinese ability to blind the spacecraft, according to sources.
It remains unclear how many times the ground-based laser was tested against U.S. spacecraft or whether it was successful.
But the combination of China?s efforts and advances in Russian satellite jamming capabilities illustrate vulnerabilities to the U.S. space network are at the core of U.S. Air Force plans to develop new space architectures and highly classified systems, according to sources.
According to experts, lasers ? depending on their power level ? could blind electro-optical satellites like the giant Keyhole spacecraft or even interfere with radar satellites like the Lacrosse. Blinding, one source said, is different than disabling given the enormous power required to shoot a laser through the dense lower atmosphere and reach a fast-moving satellite in space. The hardware on the spacecraft can?t be changed given they?re in orbit, but software changes can help them weather disruptive attacks.
Russian jamming systems are publicly known ? the Air Force destroyed such a system deployed to Iraq to keep American GPS guided bombs from finding their targets during the 2003. The site was destroyed by GPS guided bombs.
Pentagon officials, however, have kept quiet regarding China?s efforts as part of a Bush administration policy to keep from angering Beijing, which is a leading U.S. trading partner and seen as key to dealing with onerous states like North Korea and Iran.

The USA is trying to get China to help with threats like North Korea, but between this and issues of trade, this gives China all the advantages. While China continues to fuel our Islamic enemies, on top of the fact China is not our friend either.

September 28, 2006

Islam is Incompatible With the West! Even the Pentagon Knows. (Audio)

by @ 9:21 pm. Filed under Audio, Terrorism and War

So I’ve been showing you why in repeated posts and Michael Savage said it yesterday. Islam is simply not compatible with Western society. Even devout Muslims know this, because whenever you view a Muslim web site that defends actions we Westerners feel are insane, they start with statements about not looking at things with a Western view. The Muslim nations with a shred of decency have been influenced by the West. And some of the talk about Muslims making great achievements in math and science are bogus. No group goes from making great advances in science and math, to living like nomads. However, if the Muslim raiders obtained information from people in lands they overtook, this fully explains why Muslim lands look pretty backwards when separated from Christian and Jewish lands that are making advances in areas like science and math. Because Islam suppresses efforts to advance. It does not promote them like Christianity. Robert Spencer fills in some of the details in his book The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades). Mr. Spencer has a new book out titled The Truth About Muhammad: Founder of the World’s Most Intolerant Religion. I can’t wait to get my hands on that!!!

So here’s my list of reasons why Islam is not compatible with the Western world. If I thought about it longer, this list would probably contain more, but we’ll go with this for now.

Islam is not compatible with the West because of Islam’s:

Of course you might say you know a Muslim who is not like that, but I would venture to say that Muslim is Westernized and not orthodox. The list above is endorsed in Muslim controlled parts of the world that are free of Western influence. And even many Muslims in America seem not to have their wives out much. It’s interesting how many Muslim men keep their wife/wives in the house and if they come out the women must dress like mummies, while the man often wears regular clothing. Even in the Islamist front group (my opinion of them) CAIR you only see men speaking for that organization.

The actions listed above are in the Koran and other Islamic books, that Muslims feel are holy. Despite the appalling things in the Koran, Muslims feel it was written by Allah and given to Mohammed. And it’s not like the Bible, which has a New Testament that reforms some things contained in the Old Testament. The violence in Islam comes later in Mohammed’s life and is in the Koran.

You don’t have to believe me when I say orthodox Islam is the problem. The Pentagon has spent plenty of your tax dollars to come to basically the same conclusion, regarding what are called Islamic radicals. I just call them orthodox followers of Islam, because that is what they are. The most orthodox followers of the cult.

Suicide bombers follow Quran, concludes Pentagon briefing

Tasked with pinpointing motivation, analysts find terrorists ‘rational actors’ following ‘holy book’

With suicide bombings spreading from Iraq to Afghanistan, the Pentagon has tasked intelligence analysts to pinpoint what’s driving Muslim after Muslim to do the unthinkable.

Their preliminary finding is politically explosive: it’s their “holy book” the Quran after all, according to intelligence briefings obtained by WND.

In public, the U.S. government has made an effort to avoid linking the terrorist threat to Islam and the Quran while dismissing suicide terrorists as crazed heretics who pervert Islamic teachings.

“The terrorists distort the idea of jihad into a call for violence and murder,” the White House maintains in its recently released “National Strategy for Combating Terrorism” report.

But internal Pentagon briefings show intelligence analysts have reached a wholly different conclusion after studying Islamic scripture and the backgrounds of suicide terrorists. They’ve found that most Muslim suicide bombers are in fact students of the Quran who are motivated by its violent commands ? making them, as strange as it sounds to the West, “rational actors” on the Islamic stage.


(Please read all of that.)

In Dr. Savage’s talk about Islam being incompatible with the West, he calls for reform in Islam. Given how Muslims feel about the Koran, I don’t think that will ever happen. It is constructed to have the worse parts in the later parts of Muhammad’s life. After he did all his dirt, so he could claim it was all ordained by “Allah”. This causes those parts to supersede any earlier teachings. Just as the Bible’s New Testament supersedes any contrary teachings from the Old Testament.

Hear Michael Savage using the audio link below.
Dr. Michael Savage on how Islam is incompatible with the Western World – MP3 Audio
(If linking, please link to this post, not the audio file. For the sake of bandwidth there will be no other formats made.)

Independent Conservative - Copyright 2008 - Copyright Notice

[powered by WordPress.]

32 queries. 0.293 seconds