This is probably the most dangerous yet under-reported story in America. When a group of head law enforcement officers send a warning about homeland security, you would think it would be on the front pages of newspapers across the nation. But in today’s odd media, it seems junk like the Emmys gets more attention.

Also, Congressman Tom Tancredo says:

These people are not paying $50,000 or more a head just to ‘take jobs no American will do.’

Of course you want to read that entire article.

Cybercast News Service found that from 2001-2005 90,000 illegal aliens were apprehended, that came from nations where radical Islam has a strong foothold or nations identified as state sponsors of terrorism.

Sheriffs mentioned in the article represent the following Texas Counties:

• Sheriff Sigifredo Gonzalez of Zapata County
• Jim Hogg County
• Sheriff Wayne Jernigan of Valverde County
• Sheriff Arvin West of Hudspeth County

Now lets just say we had a guest worker program. Where the US government works with Mexican officials, to assign “guest worker” passes to people in Mexico. Who in their right mind thinks terrorists won’t be able to bribe their way into obtaining some of those passes? Mexico has always been ripe with officials who are more than willing to take bribes and they have far less oversight than America’s corrupt politicians. The article mentions that the Mexican military may be helping the terrorists now. So no matter what kind of special program is created with Mexico, terrorists will find a way to exploit it. This is why the US Southern border should be walled shut, fully militarized and no immigration allowed outside of stiff immigration policy used for any potential immigrant into this nation.

This has been a production of the Guard the Borders Blogburst. It is syndicated by Euphoric Reality, and serves to keep immigration issues in the forefront of our minds as we’re going about our daily lives and continuing to fight the war on terror. If you are concerned with the trend of illegal immigration in our country, join the Blogburst! Send an email with your blog name and url to euphoricrealitynet at gmail dot com.

Many of you have probably already heard about Ray Nagin comparing New York’s Ground Zero to a “hole in the ground”. Totally belittling the significance of the site. One would think, that given some time, Mayor Nagin would swiftly and formerly offer a full apology for that comment when directly asked. But it turns out he was unable to do so on today’s airing of NBC’s Meet the Press. Any consolatory comments he made only came after host Tim Russert continually questioned and pressed him on the matter.

Here is the text transcript of how Nagin initially responded today, when Russert asked him point blank if he would apologize.

Notice, he was asked directly if he will “apologize” and he did not in his initial response. He got into spin about “context” and the “e-mail”, then says he “probably” should have used a term like “undeveloped site” and he ends his statement by saying we should watch him tonight. I don’t think it’s going to cool anything over, because tonight his statement about Ground Zero will be the same. He called it a hole in the ground. Of course if his city were ever called a “hole” in Louisiana, I don’t think he’d appreciate it. He was given a free opportunity to put an end to this with a full apology and he decided to get into spin about “context”.

Mr. Russert pressed him more on the matter and only then did Nagin say things like he was sorry for those who lost loved ones on 9/11, he wishes he would have used other words and he “meant no disrespect”. Why did Russert have to detail question after question and continue on this issue for Nagin to say any of this? Why did he not offer a proper apology when first asked? I say it’s because the man is simply not very bright.

Hear Tim Russert’s discussion with Ray Nagin on this issue using the audio link below.
Tim Russert question Ray Nagin about his “hole in the ground” comment – WMA Audio
(If linking, please link to this post, not the audio file. For the sake of bandwidth there will be no other formats made.)

update 8/28/2006 12:00PM: You can view the actual video of Nagin making his comment in that mentioned “context” using this link courtesy of CBSNews. Seeing it in what Nagin says is its proper context does not change my opinion on the matter. All he had to say is that he’s working on cleaning things up and as he previously stated he can’t touch private property. There was no reason for him to even mention Ground Zero, especially as a “hole in the ground”. The video also points out how Ray Nagin has a long history of making stupid statements. But hey he was re-elected and I’m still waiting for those who claim they care about voters’ “rights” to file those lawsuits they claimed were on the way.

In a political compromise with Democrats, President Bush has endorsed over the counter sales of the “Plan B” pill. I’ve detailed how this pill actually does kill some babies, by starving them to death in the womb, in a previous post. So Bush has made a compromise that will result in people leisurely killing the most innocent of lives. Of course rapist and child molesters will be able to buy the pill to kill babies they helped conceive or to prevent conception, but the release of this pill to the open US market presents other issues. I found a great write-up that everyone should check out titled “President Bush Plan B Decision: Politics Trumps Women’s Health”. It details some of the issues related to the release of Plan B over the counter, but even it misses one important factor.

The factor being missed by many is that Plan B is going to take the fornication (sex out of wedlock) culture to another level. Another level as in a level lower and deeper into hell. Because now everyone that wanted to fornicate, but felt inhibited by the consequences of potential conception will now feel less inhibited than ever before. People who found issues with or simply did not possess forms of contraception prior to wanting to fornicate, will now feel they have an option outside of abortion, to free themselves of the responsibilities involved in raising a child. But they actually might be causing an abortion as I’ve previously detailed.

The pro-death community sees this as a way to stop what they call “unwanted pregnancies”, but when God creates a life in the womb, regardless of the means of conception, it is because he wants that life to exists. The Lord of all gives the life and does not see that baby as “unwanted”. Despite the fact the child may have been conceived in the mist of a sinful act, does not mean God did not establish a plan for that child’s life, that might bring deliverance to those in need. To cut that life short in the womb only causes Man to continue to miss his own blessings.

In some cases, this even works in earthly monetary terms. There are mothers who spend their lives in poverty, only to be brought to a higher economic level by one or more of their children. When a life in the womb is ended, some poor mother might be damming herself to a life of poverty. And some poor mother may think that holding back a life might help them to increase their future earning potential, but one who can end a life for the sake of monetary gain only delivers themselves a sad spiritual reward. So even a gain on earth could mean an eternity of sad consequences. It’s best not to follow up one sin of fornication with a potential murder.

Plan B will do nothing to curb the fornication culture in America. While Bush’s efforts to encourage abstinence may have helped some teens to decide not to engage in fornication, his endorsement of Plan B totally runs counter to those efforts. Bush feels this move might help his FDA nominee gain Senate approval. But what good is his nominee if it means Liberals’ pro-baby-killing agenda is advanced? This will only cause them to come up with more inventive ways to kill babies and tell the public it’s not an abortifacient (drug that causes abortion), when in some cases it actually is.

Some people may find out later that they killed a baby and say they were deceived. This is exactly what Eve said said to God when asked why she sinned and Adam attempted to shift all blame to her when he was questioned. But God still made them AND US pay dire consequences for that sin.

So claiming ignorance does not necessarily prevent judgement. Blame the serpents in the pro-death industry all you wish, but such excuses did not work for Adam and Eve and I don’t think they will work for us either, if we choose to indulge in sin.

It is interesting how followers of Islam call it a “religion of peace”, but those who convert from Islam to the faith led by the Prince of Peace Jesus Christ are often attacked and killed in Muslim lands. In Bangladesh, not only are converts targets, but also Christians that share news of the true Prince of Peace with others.

How many Muslims peacefully telling people about Islam in mostly Christian or Jewish areas can say they and converts to the cult of Islam are marked for death? Not to mention, some Muslim areas target Christian converts for death BY LAW! Tell me a single mostly Christian or Jewish nation where the state sanctions such against Muslim converts?

Related post: Afghanistan?s Secret Christians

So last night on FoxNews Juan Williams took on Al Sharpton. Juan’s new book Enough: The Phony Leaders, Dead-End Movements, and Culture of Failure That Are Undermining Black America?and What We Can Do About It, has all the poverty pimps crying and moaning. Which is their favorite pastime anyway. They see Juan’s criticism as bad for their business, given their CEO status in the Civil Rights Industry. You can watch the video of Mr. Williams and Sharpton’s debate using this video link. It was on Bill O’Riley’s show.

Bill asked Juan for an example of Al Sharpton taking money from corporations while not working in the best interests of Blacks. (You know, since people like Sharpton claim that they work in the best interests of Blacks and all…) Mr. Williams cited a 2002 WSJ article related to the Word Network shakedown protests. (Race hustlers crying to cable companies to carry an all Black Gospel network or be branded something like “racists”.) While it was self serving for people like Jesse Jackson, who has programs on the Word Network, it was not the best example of something Sharpton was involved in that worked directly against the best interests of those Sharpton claims to protect.

Why didn’t Juan bring up Sharpton’s advertising work with the shady quick loan company LoanMax? A prime example of Sharpton working with a company that has left plenty of people who were not credit worthy in worse shape, by offering them loans with insane, but legal (in some states) terms. Not exactly a nice way to look out for “the little guy” as Sharpton likes to claim. (Not that I feel Blacks should be associated with poverty and bad credit, but it’s what the poverty pimps do. And no I don’t feel people with bad credit should be given loan terms that equal someone who has proven themselves to be more trustworthy. Just the same I’d never endorse a quick loan company, with their terms that really are insane.)

And there are other examples, like Shaprton’s infamous “coke tape” that I also mention in that link above. There is no shortage of examples of Sharpton doing things that have hurt more Blacks than he’s helped. Like his advocacy of the federal government forcing states to allow mothers to kill their own babies in the womb (aka abortion). The blood runs in the abortion mills daily and you’ll never see Al Sharpton outside with a protest sign!

And let’s not forget Shaprton’s efforts to try and convince Blacks that the gay lifestyle should be accepted, instead of being condemned as the sin that it is. Souls following Sharpton’s teachings are sure to be lost in some serious sin!

OK, this is the last example because there are so many I don’t want to waste hours listing more. But Al Sharpton was one of the nuts who was against executing thug Stanley “Tookie” Williams. If George W. Bush started a street gang that resulted in Blacks killing each other, do you think Sharpton would want to “save Bush” because he wrote some children’s books from his jail cell? Of course not! He didn’t even protest the execution of Clarence Ray Allen. One Liberal noted how the race baiters were absent, when the person about to be executed was not Black. So Sharpton has supported people who inspire the murder of Blacks inside and even outside of the womb. Not even a Klansman could do a better job of working against Blacks. In fact, in this regard I think the Klan honestly praises Sharpton’s efforts!

Related post: Are Blacks Capable of Doing Well for Themselves in America Without Being Given Something Special?