The people of Indiana are hoping for a chance to vote on a constitutional amendment to ensure marriage remains a union of one man and one woman. In the mean time they have a law on the books that helps defend marriage until that time. This prevents the perverted Pro-Gay Lobby’s efforts to try and have the state offer special recognition to gays that feel they should be granted a status reserved for one man and one woman that make their union official - married. One of the cornerstones of defending marriage is the fact it is the best environment for raising children. Indiana’s Supreme Court fails to make that connection and has approved of the adoption of children by couples that are not married. They can be unmarried male/female fornicators, they can be a gay couple and the state’s high court feels they are just fine for raising children.

It is harder, but possible for a single person to raise a child. And a single person can keep themselves from exposing a child to sins like fornication. Plus there are plenty of cases where 2 parents have failed in their duties and someone like an older widow might take in the child for care. A married couple adopting is optimal, but other than that a single person that does not expose the child to negative influences is all that should be allowed. Couples that are “shacking up” should not be allowed to adopt children. Adoption is a privilege that should not be granted to straight unmarried or gay couples. The people in the state of Indiana are in the process of rejecting privileges for gay couples and unmarried couples have no privileges either. Therefore they should not be allowed the privilege of adopting a child.

An unmarried heterosexual couple exposes a child to out of wedlock sex, which may have been the conditions the child was conceived in. An adopting family should be able to provide better, not raise the child in an environment of sin that could continue a cycle of out of wedlock sex and children born outside of wedlock. A gay couple simply is a sinful non-productive entity and so children should not be raised in such conditions via state approved adoption.

For Indiana’s Supreme Court to allow such an endorsement of sinful “couples” runs counter to efforts in the state to defend marriage and good social order.

Many states once had laws to prevent fornication and sodomy. Now Liberal judges have removed those laws and turned established social order on its head, by allowing the same people that once would have been charged with a crime to adopt children. These kinds of legal matters like state approved immoral forms of adoption used to never exists, because once upon a time America knew better.