Rekjalhew

July 28, 2006

Flashback (January 2005 ABCNews): Controversial Psychiatrist in Yates Case Speaks Out

by @ 1:52 pm. Filed under The Truth Shall Set you Free!

Dr. Michael Welner is not the only psychiatrist that found Andrea Yates to be sane when she murdered her 5 children. Remember Park Dietz? He also felt she was sane and his mistake about mentioning an episode of the TV show “Law & Order” resulted in Andrea Yates being taken off a life in prison sentence.

Controversial Psychiatrist in Yates Case Speaks Out

Park Dietz, Whose ‘Law & Order’ Testimony Led to the Court Action, Insists Yates Was Sane

Jan. 7, 2005 ? The psychiatrist whose testimony helped convict Andrea Yates in the slayings of three of her children ? and was the basis for an appeals court’s decision to overturn the convictions ? says he made a mistake, but still believes the Texas mother was sane when she killed her children.

“I don’t think there’s any question about that [Yates' sanity],” Dietz said in an interview on “Good Morning America” today. “The evidence that she knew right from wrong is what she said. She says in recorded statements, including my interviews, that as she killed her children, she knew that it was wrong to do it. She knew God would disapprove. And she knew society would disapprove. That’s the evidence. With that kind of smoking gun evidence that she knew it was wrong, it would be silly to make up something else.”

On Thursday, a three-judge panel of the First Court of Appeals in Houston overturned Yates’ capital murder convictions for the 2001 slayings of three of her five children and ordered a new trial. (Yates had confessed and pleaded guilty to killing her other two children.) In its ruling, the panel cited the false testimony by Dietz.

Dietz said he based his conclusion that Yates was sane in part on Yates’ belief that Satan, not God, had ordered the murders. But Dietz incorrectly testified that an episode of “Law & Order” dealing with postpartum depression aired just before the killings, inferring that Yates was inspired by the show. Dietz, a consultant for “Law & Order” at the time, told jurors the episode portrayed a woman who drowned her children and was later found not guilty by reason of insanity.

An Honest Mistake

Producers from “Law & Order” called Yates’ attorney and said such an episode didn’t exist. Yates’ attorney called for a mistrial but his petition was denied and Yates was convicted. Prosecutors admitted the “Law & Order” mistake, saying it was unintentional, and a grand jury later cleared Dietz of perjury allegations.

Today, Dietz said he made an honest mistake when he referred to the nonexistent “Law & Order” episode and tried to correct his error immediately.

“I made an honest mistake about the television show during cross-examination, and a week later I learned that I might be mistaken,” Dietz said. “I immediately researched it and that same day offered to fly back to Houston during the trial and correct the error. I was told just to put it in writing, and I wrote a detailed letter, sent it to the prosecution. They gave it to the defense, and unfortunately it wasn’t put into the record. So the three-judge panel didn’t have access to the full story.”

Park Dietz was a consultant for the show and made an honest error, that he did all he could to correct. Which is why Andrea Yates’ defense attorney’s request for a mistrial was denied back in 2005. But her defense was able to swindle the court of appeals and now we have a situation where a convicted murder has had their sentence overturned to “not guilty by reason of insanity”, because the defense was able to manipulate the courts.


Related post:

OK La Shawn is Right. Race Exclusive Titles are Wrong.

by @ 11:53 am. Filed under Illegal Aliens, The Truth Shall Set you Free!

See the details in her post at her blog via this link.

I’ve mentioned the group Choose Black America in this past post, where I was focusing my attention on some nonsense said by former President Jimmy Carter. What I did not note and I’m glad La Shawn raised the issue, is that the group should not be using a racially exclusive name.

It is hypocritical to create an organization that is trying to fight the racial exclusion of Blacks, while having a name that is racially exclusive. Similar applies to the group formed to stop racial exclusion of Blacks in the Black hair care industry. That group is mentioned in a documentary I noted in this other prior post.

On another note, I saw a T-shirt yesterday that I’ve seen before years ago, but I never thought of how racist it is until more recently. The T-Shirt said:

The Blacker the college the sweeter the knowledge

Having attended a college that was once for “Blacks only”, I was fully desensitized to the racism embodied in such a statement when I was younger. Now that I’m older and saw that shirt again for the first time in many years, I realized if it said “The Whiter the college the sweeter the knowledge”, we would see mobs of Blacks having a White T-Shirt burning! It’s time to stop such racist statements and it’s time to stop using bigoted titles. I’m not saying that there is no such thing as Black culture. There are some things that are culturally Black and deserve the title. There are styles of music, food and other things that are distinctively Black by culture. But that does not mean the title “Black” should be used to promote “Black” as being a superior education or “Black” as a superior worker. That goes beyond the simpler facets of culture into preference of certain of humans over others on the basis of skin tone. Lets try to be Americans and embrace being part of a nation of laws that should be respected.


update 7/28/2006 12:10PM:
LBC herself has chimed in to say:

Thanks for the trackback, D. but I didn?t say race-based titles are wrong per se. I just don?t like them, and I think they?re unnecessarily and unintentionally exclusive and divisive.

OK, then I feel they are wrong when used in the manner I mentioned :D . I don’t make much room in my own little world for gray areas :D .

Westboro Baptist Church Debate! ACLU versus ACLJ on Sean Hannity Show. (Audio)

by @ 12:13 am. Filed under Audio, Nuts on Parade

People have been shocked by the actions of the nutcases of the Westboro Baptist Church of Topeka Kansas. And various legislative bodies have appropriately passed laws to try and stop them from spewing their garbage in the presence of grieving families, attending the funerals of fallen soldiers. The ACLU has found that this “church” of insanity is something they wanted to help out in court, to try and do away with some of the new laws.

Let’s face it, the nuts of the Westboro Baptist Church have the media’s attention and there is always some Liberal group willing to ride a media wave. So in comes the ACLU, to ride the wave most would never dare touch. Which shows they are by far the most despicable legal group in America.

Sean Hannity hosted a debate between Shirley Phelps-Roper’s ACLU attorney Anthony “Tony” Rothert and ACLJ attorney Jay Sekulow.
(The ACLJ is a group that often kicks the ACLU’s butt in court and stands for the rights of real churches, not cults.

The Phelps do not represent primitive Baptist churches at all, although they claim to follow those teachings. It is horrible that the Phelps even try to associate themselves with primitive Baptists. I love primitive Baptists and was even in worship at a primitive Baptist church this past Sunday.)

The ACLU attorney (Tony Rothert) said he disagrees with the Phelps’ actions, but does not find their acts to be “despicable”, when asked directly.

Hannity was really trying to figure out how anyone in their right mind would defend the Phelps clowns. And it resulted in this telling exchange.

Hannity: On a human level, why do you want to be a part of a case that brings suffering to military families?

ACLU Attorney Tony Rothert: I think the best way we can honor brave soldiers, especially the ones who’ve died is to honor the first amendment and not cheapen it.

The ACLU is so twisted, that they attempt to claim that defending the most disrespectful of nuts, that spew hatred at dead soldiers and their families is somehow a way to show those soldiers “honor”. Which proves you can’t be in your right mind and work for the ACLU.
(And for the record I think Republican and sometimes ACLU attorney Bob Barr is an idiot. I never liked him!)

At one point Rothert attempted to bring up an instance where the ACLU supposedly defended Sean Hannity, but Hannity quickly squashed that by mentioning how the ACLU stabbed him in the back.

Jay Sekulow focused on the fact people outside with bullhorns might be heard inside the funeral service and therefore cause a disruption.

This was a very interesting debate.

Hear it all using the audio links below. (2 parts)
Sean Hannity host ACLU – ACLJ debate part 1 – ASF Audio

Sean Hannity host ACLU – ACLJ debate part 2 – ASF Audio
(For the sake of bandwidth there will be no other formats made.)


Related post:
ACLU Stands Behind The Westboro Baptist Church of Topeka Kansas

July 27, 2006

Catholic Professor “suspended” from Catholic University for Standing with Israel

by @ 5:04 pm. Filed under Evangelicals Under Attack

Dhimmitude being paid at a Catholic University. Just when you thought you’d seen it all! I’m not sure why the word “suspended” is being used, when he’s lost his position and benefits. It sounds like a form of firing under different a different term.

Professor Thomas Klocek stood up to some Israel hating Muslims outside of the class time at DePaul University. The Catholic professor’s reward from the Catholic university for his actions was a “suspension”. At the request of the anti-Israel groups, that had CAIR backing them up.

CAIR Gets DePaul Professor Suspended For “Offending” Muslim Students (Commentary by Jim Kouri.)


Klocek was suspended from the university following a campaign launched by pro-Palestinian student groups and the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR). Klocek believes in Israel’s right to exist as a sovereign Jewish state within safe and secure borders.

CAIR and Muslim student groups told University officials that Klocek offended Muslim students when discussing Christian interests in Israel, disputing that Israeli treatment of Palestinians was akin to the Nazi treatment of the Jews, and then terminating the discussion when it appeared that the students were more interested in Israel-bashing than discussing the issues.

In an interview with Walking Eagle Productions, a documentary film company covering the DePaul controversy, Klocek said that he was suspended by DePaul administration, and ultimately lost his position and teaching benefits, after engaging in an out-of-class argument with pro-Palestinian students at a student activities fair on campus.

Klocek shared that he served 14 years a part-time adjunct professor in DePaul’s School of New Learning and that he was considered a popular professor, with large class enrollments and received excellent student reviews, with no prior complaints about Klocek’s behavior.

But after engaging in heated discussion with two Muslim student groups at a Student Involvement Fair on DePaul’s campus, the student groups Students for Justice in Palestine (SPJ) and United Muslims Moving Ahead (UMMA) went to the administration to call for Klocek’s firing. Both groups were backed by CAIR’s Chicago office, and other local Muslim advocate groups, some of whom called for even harsher punishment.

Of course if he trashed America or Israel he’d still have his job.

Hat tip Michael Savage.

Yes Female Child Molesters Repeat Offend Too! Teacher Arrested After Previous Reprimands.

by @ 4:09 pm. Filed under Nuts on Parade

We all know female child molesters often get lighter sentences than male child molesters. A common reason given by people who speak in defense of female molesters, is that female molesters don’t “continually prey on children”. As if female molesters go after one young boy for some sort of romantic relationship and never prey on other young boys. This is not true. The sick mentality that causes some men to abuse children also resides in some women. Which is why the gender of the molester should not matter. Put them all under the jail.

Here in Tennessee, a female teacher that was previously reprimanded and investigated has now been arrested for soliciting a young boy for sex.

Teacher Resigns, Accused Of Soliciting A Minor (video report included, but best to read the text report for additional details)

SANTA FE, Tenn. — A former sixth-grade teacher is accused of soliciting a 14-year-old male student for sex.

Andrea Jill Rail, 27, resigned from her position at the Santa Fe Unit School on Monday and was arrested on Tuesday. She was released on $10,000 bond, but faces two counts of soliciting a minor.

Teacher Was Previously Reprimanded

A reprimand letter in Rail’s personnel file reveals the principal of the school wrote a complaint about her relationship with the student in August 2005. At this time, Rail was instructed not to have contact with the boy.

However, in November during a middle school lock-in, the letter reads that Rail’s actions were particularly disturbing because she was told to stay away from the student.

The letter does not get into detail about what allegedly happened, but Rail was once again ordered not to have contact with the student and forbidden to conduct school fundraisers.

The Director of Schools said they immediately informed Maury County detectives of this incident, but Rail was not fired because the school was told investigators could find no evidence of a crime.

If found guilty I recommend my usual life in prison with hard labor sentence.

It’s about time young boys molested by women receive equal protection under the law.

Independent Conservative - Copyright 2008 - Copyright Notice

[powered by WordPress.]

32 queries. 0.335 seconds