Rekjalhew

July 9, 2006

Tom Tancredo Says Bush Violating Oath of Office and Bill Clinton did Better on Illegal Immigration Enforcement (Audio)

by @ 1:44 am. Filed under Audio, Illegal Aliens

Congressman Tom Tancredo was on the Jim Bohannon Show recently discussing his new book In Mortal Danger: The Battle for America’s Border and Security. During the discussion he made some very interesting statements. He mentioned that he felt President George W. Bush is:

violating his oath of office

Because of his lax work on defending America’s borders and enforcement of current immigration laws. I agree with him. America’s security is at risk and we know terrorists are crossing the Southern border. Presidents have been failing in this regard for far too long. The latest media leak about the Holland Tunnel bombing plot shows President Bush is doing well in one area of the fight against terrorism (despite media interference), but still leaving the back door wide open.

Congressman Tancredo also said:


Bill Clinton did a better job in terms of actual numbers of people that he put into the border patrol and going after work site enforcement. He had more work site enforcement. More than this President has had since he’s been in office. This is not something I like to tell people, but it is the truth.

Now that’s just sad that after 9/11 the current President is not doing as well as the former one. While Bush’s Administration has been speaking of adding more people to the border patrol, they obviously are not doing as much as former President Bill Clinton did.

Joseph Farah mentions the following in a recent World Net Daily column.

Bush deceives on border


Earlier this month, Bush made reference to “doubling the size of the Border Patrol during my administration.”

There’s just one problem. Not only has the Border Patrol not been doubled during his administration, the White House has fought against significant increases in its budget every year since 2001. Actually, the Border Patrol was growing faster during the Clinton administration – before Sept. 11, 2001 – than it has since 9-11. The Clinton administration increased the Border Patrol from 4,026 in 1993 to 9,078 when they left office in 2001, an increase of 5,052 agents or 125 percent. Bush has increased the manpower from 9,078 to the 11,800 we have today, an increase of 2,722 agents or 30 percent.

Just last year, four full years after 9-11, the White House’s 2006 budget included funds for only 210 new Border Patrol agents, not the 2,000 new agents authorized by Congress in the Intelligence Reform Act of 2004. He still has not adopted the congressional plan to add 2,000 new agents per year for five years.

Once again, earlier this month, Bush reiterated the defamatory statement that illegal aliens are sneaking across the border to “do work Americans aren’t doing.”

There’s just one problem. Of 473 job categories studied by the Center for Immigration Studies for the year 2004, only four – plasters and stucco masons, dressmakers and sewers, agricultural graders and sorters, and miscellaneous personal appearance workers – had a majority of immigrant workers, and only 23 out of 473 job categories (less than 5 percent) had 33 percent or more. More to the point, every single kind of work done by illegal aliens in this country is also performed by Americans.

One of the reasons some jobs are increasingly being taken over by illegals is because they will accept jobs for lower pay. When a construction worker loses a $15 an hour job to an illegal worker who will do it for $8.50, that is not an example of a poor work ethic by Americans.

Bush also said just last month: “We need to hold employers to account for the workers they hire.”

There’s just one problem. During the eight years of the Clinton administration, 5,587 employers were fined for violating the laws against employing illegal workers, an average of 698 per year. During the first four years of the Bush administration, a total of 218 fines were issued – less than 55 per year. In 2004 only four fines were issued.

Again, just last month, Bush claimed about his amnesty program: “Every worker who applies for the [guest worker] program would be required to pass a criminal background check.”

There’s just one problem. The U.S. government does not have the capability of doing this. The U.S. can only check criminal records within the U.S, not crimes illegal aliens may have committed in their home countries. Mexico does not even have a centralized database of criminal warrants. Tens of thousands of child molesters, car thieves and violent criminals who entered our country illegally would be eligible for a legal work permit under both the president’s plan and the Senate bill passed May 25.

Even more recently La Shawn Barber exposed how Bush’s claimed “compromise” for a plan put forth by Congressman Mike Pence really is another amnesty plan.

Hear Congressman Tancredo and Jim Bohannon using the audio link below. The first voice heard is that of Jim Bohannon.
Congressman Tom Tancredo and Jim Bohannon discuss illegal immigration - WMA Audio
(For the sake of bandwidth there will be no other formats made.)



3 Responses to “Tom Tancredo Says Bush Violating Oath of Office and Bill Clinton did Better on Illegal Immigration Enforcement (Audio)”

  1. rightonpeachtree Says:

    This is why there should be an “enforcement only” bill to start with. It should not be comprehensive because we just can’t trust this government to do the enforcement part. We trusted them in 1986 and here we are with a mess 20 years later.

    I would take it even further. I would revoke citizenship of children born here to illegal immigrants. Anchor babies/schmanchor babies. Illegal is illegal. Also, I would put a 50% surcharge on any wires of money to other countries by non-US citizens. That would put a chill on it and it would raise some money for our overburdened schools and hospitals.

    I’m worried, though, that we’re just getting lip service from many pols because of this being an election year. I’m concerned that they will talk tough until the election and then they will all favor amnesty after the election (with the exception of Tancredo and a handful of others).

  2. IndependentConservative Says:

    Hey I think I fixed the problem you were having with the comments area ;) .

    No those anchor babies should not be granted citizenship. Check out this GTB post where that was addressed in some detail.

    I like that 50% surcharge idea. Although a fee too high might prompt them to find other methods to transfer their money. And they will have tons of fake IDs to make it look like they are legal when they visit a Western Union to wire funds.

    We’ve got to lock down the southern border. That will require full militarization of the southern border and starting work on a massive wall.

  3. rightonpeachtree Says:

    The comments do seem to be working just fine now. Nice work.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Independent Conservative - Copyright 2008 - Copyright Notice

[powered by WordPress.]

32 queries. 0.379 seconds