This is just a disturbing fact. We Conservatives are always talking about how Liberal policies endanger America and how Islamic Radicals must love their efforts. We now have solid confirmation. Islamic Radical shooter Naveed Afzal Haq walked into the Jewish Federation of Greater Seattle and said:

I’m a Muslim American; I’m angry at Israel,

Then he let the shots fly! Given he used the hyphenated American title of Muslim-American, should have been a sure give away that he’s Liberal. But we have further confirmation. Today Michael Medved revealed more facts about Naveed Afzal Haq on his show.

It turns out Haq has a page on Friendster.com. And there in the “About Me” section he says:

Being opinionated is not me but I lean on the liberal side.

Mr. Medved says that someone who knew him said he didn’t like living in Conservative areas and preferred Seattle. I don’t think there is any dispute the man was a Liberal and loved being around Liberals. You don’t think the fact that many Liberals berate Israel had anything to do with it do you? (I do.)

So Naveed Afzal Haq is an Islamic Radical Unhinged Liberal to be exact!

It’s pretty obvious why he had a page on Friendster.com. This guy could not even keep a woman in an arranged marriage! (Notice the Liberal headline in the article below.)

Yup the Liberal “insanity” defense is already coming out! As you know, I’m totally in favor of the death penalty regardless of the killer’s supposed mental state. Because whatever state a murderer has their mind in has proven to be bad for society and so they should be removed from it.

Haq is also an engineer like his father. He is an electrical engineer to be exact. I’m sure there are many who work in IT that raised their eyes on that one!

Michael Medved agrees that Haq should be given the death penalty and even points out why “hate crimes” laws are not necessary for this or any other case. If a Jew did the shooting would it be any less a deadly act of hate?

Hear Michael Medved reveal the disturbing truth using the audio link below. This one is small enough that I made an MP3 version. So hopefully everyone can hear it.
Michael Medved on Naveed Afzal Haq being a Liberal - MP3 Audio

What can I a Christian say when a fellow Christian makes a total ass of himself? Mel’s an idiot! That’s all I can say. I love the man’s movies. But I’m not going to make excuses for him and I don’t know if/when I’ll see another. If he ONLY had a drinking problem, this would not be such a big deal. He’s always had a drinking problem and as I’ve mentioned, that is a fight he and others with such an issue will have to endure. In his own public apology he has said that he’s fighting the issue. He was caught doing a “DUI” and tried to evade police (like Patrick Kennedy), but he made matters worse by mouthing off to officers and trashing Jews. His apology included statements about how he was sorry about mouthing off to officers. I’m not sure what sadistic pleasure some people get out of trashing Jews, but Gibson seems to have that obsession and did not directly address it in his apology.

The police report mentions how he let out a “barrage” of anti-Semitic statements. I don’t think the police report was able to capture them all. He even asked an officer if they were a Jew. I guess he would have called his arrest a “Jewish conspiracy” if he found officers involved were Jewish. There was an attempt to cover up Gibson’s behavior and he’s been stopped by police before on more than one occasion and let go, despite the fact he may have been drunk. The police in that area are going to have to do better. Gibson should not receive special treatment and should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. I really would not have been upset if one of the cops gave him a whack for his smart mouth!

Sadly, Mel Gibson seems to have the very same issues his father has and I suspect in terms of race those issues probably go beyond just Jews. Some are saying people should go easy on Gibson. I heard Michael Medved today saying something along those lines. Michelle Malkin says this is very awful “if” the reports are true. It seems some Conservatives are being awfully cordial about this issue or choosing some hedged words. No Liberal would be given an “if” and they would be dismissed harshly. Now that Gibson has apologized there is no “if” to consider. But it’s interesting to see a fellow Conservative hedge a police report with “if”. Since when did we start putting an “if” on the words of a police officer? I thought we Conservatives were the ones who back claims made by an officer in a police report? And I don’t know if Medved has been so nice towards Liberals who have said stupid things. Keep in mind I have much respect for both Medved and Malkin.

Gibson is an idiot. He has avoided saying a word directly about his attacks against Jews. And if not for the bad publicity, who knows if he would have even apologized to the cops. I offer no excuses for Mr. Gibson and I’ve lost a great deal of respect for him.

I’ve often heard people ask when considering their own personal issues, that they feel are a part of who they are, if God can make a mistake? They wonder how they could possibly have an issue within themselves that is not Godly, while knowing that the Lord formed them in their mother’s womb. They question how God could be involved in their creation, but they have issues with their own bodies that are not Godly. It could be a desire for drugs (including alcohol and cigarettes), sex (homosexual, heterosexual fornication and/or adultery), violent nature or whatever else.

The true answer to this question evades many, but I pray someone reads this and learns the truth. Let’s start with the fact God forms life in the womb. Regardless of the means of conception, once conceived God has his hands in the creation process. God is the creator of all and forms all new human life himself.

God Formed Each Of Us In The Womb

David recognized this when he said:

The prophet Isaiah said:

Jeremiah was told by God about his being formed and even sanctified in the womb:

If the baby was conceived in fornication, adultery or rape, God does not approve of the sinful act, but forms the life just the same. He does not inspire the sin, but may still grant a life. God is the creator and he creates life based on his plan for the given life. This is why stopping the sin of baby murdering (abortion) is so important. Man should not condone the murder of innocent children in the womb. They are creations of God the Father. They are innocent and so we have no cause to try and prevent their being born.

Man Failed God, God Never Fails Man

So how can a perfect God create a life that has an issue? Because we made the choice to make it that way. Since the original sin of Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden, Man has been out of step with God. God gave man free will. He did not create Earth as a planet to be run by robots. We decided to disobey God on our own. We decided to listen to one who God cast from Heaven for disobedience. God allowed the evil one, Satan to speak to Man and although God told man to follow His (God’s) Word, we made the choice to follow Satan for a moment. This is how we failed God. God allows a means of redemption via salvation in Jesus Christ. God has put this plan in motion to ultimately do 2 things. One is to shame Satan aka Lucifer, showing Satan that Jesus is Lord and Satan erred in trying to put himself above God. Second is to establish a kingdom that includes only those who made the choice to follow God when given the option of Jesus (life) and Satan (death).

So man failed God and because of that, although we are given a means of salvation we must endure the issues associated with our own failure. Our sin and continued sins cause issues for generations throughout the existence of mankind. I think Paul best describes this when he says.

Because of Man’s failure we invoked a sin nature in our flesh. God’s rules over man mean that he will grant to us based on our own actions. So when he creates new life, that new life embodies the fleshly desires of Man. Desires that are sinful, desires that are not right. Blame Adam and Eve, but we are no better than them. We know the truth just as they did and still allow temptation to sometimes get the best of us too. So we all have desires within us that are of the flesh, sinful and not right. We broke the relationship with God, and we should be eternally thankful that God did not destroy us on the spot for failing him.

God Has Given Man the Truth, Now it’s Man’s Job to Fight the Good Fight!

After Paul explained how man reaps what he sows, he mentioned something else.

As Paul best explained, we must keep up the fight to do what is right. We must always continue to fight the sinful nature within our flesh. We must strive to do things the way the Lord commanded. Even if we feel that we want to do something that is out of the will of the Lord, we must fight that feeling. If we have a desire to do something that is out of the will of the Lord we must fight that desire. That means drugs, sex out of wedlock which includes both gay and straight sex since Jesus commands that only one man and one woman marry to make one flesh, adultery, lust of the eye, mean spiritedness, gluttony and the list goes on. Anything out of the will of God is sin. So we must continue the fight.

No Man Wins The Fight Via Suicide

Some people hate the sinful nature within themselves so much that they allow anger to consume them and take their own lives. This does not win the fight. It allows sin to have won and the fight ends there for that person. To win the fight, we must each continue the battle within ourselves to do what is right. To live our lives as Jesus, the Word of God commands. Jesus is the Word who came in flesh to sacrifice himself for the sins of man. Suicide is the sin of murder against one’s self. God brings life, Satan brings death. So to give into the temptation to kill one’s self is to give Satan a victory. We must live and continue to resist him and any temptations within us that are not like God. We are not perfect and striving towards perfection. But we must never give up the fight!

As a brother in Christ once told me, it’s not how you start this race, but how you finish.

This Week’s GTB Blogburst. Of course you know I have no concern about American labor Unions, that are part the reason we have companies running outside the USA for laborers. But I feel this should be read because of the issues involving security and the fact this is another deal where the USA gets the least benefit and assumes the highest risks.

The North American Union, SPP, and NASCO: Erasing America’s Borders
By Heidi at Euphoric Reality

Our government has undertaken some monumental legislation that fully impacts the American way of life, our freedom, and our sovereignty. The purpose of such legislation is to homogenize Canada, Mexico, and the United States into a North American Union - and we’re all going to sleep through it.

Have you heard of a little-known program called the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America? This tri-lateral partnership was signed by President Bush last year without Congressional oversight or public approval. Opponents of the SPP have called it NAFTA on steroids - and we all know how disastrous NAFTA has been for everyone except Mexico. It also appears to be modeled on the ineffective and highly unpopular European Union (unpopular with the people, that is).

I went to the website, www.spp.gov, to begin my research. There are, indeed, no boundaries between Mexico, Canada, and the U.S. when it comes to the cooperation of financial, trade, and foreign affair departments. Though some of the PR language on the website sounds fairly benign, the commissions are picking up momentum. And you know what happens when bureaucrats start grasping at influence and power! Except that now we don’t have to just worry about our own greedy bureaucrats - but Canada’s and Mexico’s too.

This is not some weird and obscure conspiracy website, it is our government’s plan to literally give away or sell our national sovereignty. What is most galling is that we will share responsibility for security across North America. It is very conceivable that we could see our troops deployed to secure the southern border of Mexico. Yes, you read that right - not OUR unsecured warzone of a southern border - but Mexico’s border with Belize and Guatemala. That is the conclusion of an investigative report done by Lou Dobbs on CNN:

Robert B. Murray notes:

President George W. Bush, President Vicente Fox of Mexico, and former Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin agreed in March 2005 to create this union by executive regulations and agreements rather than by treaty to bypass Congress. Twenty working groups were formed and are well on their way to establishing a super-government for North America that will not be bound by our Constitution. The web site for this new bureaucracy—located at www.spp.gov—provides a look at their plans and accomplishments thus far. The plan is to have this arrangement implemented by 2010.

Behind its innocuous title, the “Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America,” the United States will surrender its Constitution. According to Jerome R. Corsi, an author and political commentator, our nation-state prerogatives would be superseded by the authority of a North American court and parliamentary body and our dollar would become the “Amero.”

Possibly the strongest leg of the SPP is NASCO - North America’s SuperCorridor Coalition - otherwise known as the NAFTA Superhighway. Airily dismissed by some public officials as internet rumors and hype and completely unaffordable, NASCO has quietly been amassing funding and already begun preliminary construction in Texas.

…already underway is the plan for a NAFTA Superhighway: 1,200 feet wide, stretching from Lazaro Cardenas on the west coast of Mexico, entering the United States at Laredo, Texas, and continuing straight north to Winnipeg, Canada, with another route to Kansas City thence north easterly to Detroit and Montreal.

Containerized goods from Asia will be offloaded onto Mexican trucks, with Mexican drivers, and distributed throughout the economic system. Go to www.nascocorridor.com to view the plan and progress. There will be no internal boundaries to restrict the flow of people, goods or services.

In fact, the first customs stop on the Superhighway will be in the heart of America - Kansas City! Along the way, primary U.S. labor unions will be by-passed in favor of Mexican labor, including the Longshoremen’s Union, the railroad United Transportation Union, and the Teamsters.

How will such a massive flow of goods and foreign traffic be monitored? According to author Jerome Corsi,

“Across the NAFTA Super-Highways will flow millions more Mexicans, now armed with North American border passes and biometric identification, as defined by the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America working groups organized within the Department of Commerce.”

Similar toll systems snaking their way from the southern and northern borders cutting through major American cities will force American citizens to submit to having RFID enabled identification cards which contain an ever-increasing array of information about their personal lives.

Illegal aliens with cloned RFID transponders will enjoy streamlined access to the US while Americans labor under the financial burden of tolls that go directly to foreign corporations and restrictions that take the right of free travel out of their hands. This and more is occurring without Congressional oversight, but is naturally funded with our state and federal tax dollars.

But our public officials are saying this could never happen, if only because it’s completely unaffordable! Not so, since foreign investment will cover any gaps that taxing the American people leaves. Additionally, the Bush administration has embarked on a policy of selling off key US infrastructure to the highest bidder - in most cases foreign owned corporations.

[K]ey players, including the investment bankers and the worldwide capital investment funds, have a plan to address these fiscal shortcomings with their own resources. On April 30, 1992, President George H.W. Bush signed Executive Order No. 12803 on infrastructure privatization, a move that cleared the way for private capital to invest in U.S. infrastructure projects, including highways.

For instance, the Indiana Toll Road, Virginia’s Pocahontas Parkway, a Texas toll road from Austin to Sequin and The Chicago Skyway have all been sold or leased for 99 years to foreign companies who will all enjoy billions in profits from American citizens forced to pay the tolls. And now the New Jersey Turnpike and the Ohio Turnpike are also under the hammer with foreign interests at the forefront of the negotiations.

An earlier Corsi article cites government websites which carry full planning details of the Super Highway. Its construction has already begun in Texas with no congressional oversight whatsoever. The Trans-Texas Corridor is being overseen by The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) and the contract is owned by the Cintra corporation which in turn is owned by the King of Spain Juan Carlos. The project is being financed by the implementation of a toll that will be collected by means of GPS tracking devices installed in all vehicles and also envelops many connecting roads to the highway. (Toll road info summarized by Paul Watson)

Watson further adds this dire prediction, “To even be allowed to use major roads and highways, US citizens will be subject to a criminal background check and the government will have the ability to pinpoint their particular RFID signal and remotely block it from central computer mainframes - effectively abolishing freedom of mobility in America.”

President Ronald Reagan once said, “A nation without borders is not a nation.” While we’ve been looking elsewhere, our own government has implemented a comprehensive plan to erase our borders with Canada and Mexico. The NAFTA Superhighway will allow vehicles, people and goods to travel from Mexico, into the American heartland, and up to Canada with little impediment, making America’s borders obsolete. Coupled with Bush’s blanket amnesty program, the new North American Union and the NAFTA Superhighway (NASCO) will fully expedite the wholesale dismantling of American sovereignty. It would seem that the while the rest of the world is already lining up to get their piece of the American pie, Americans will be the last to know. It is happening quietly and behind our backs, while our attention is fully engaged by the War on Terror, the upcoming elections, and our personal lives.

This has been a production of the Guard the Borders Blogburst. It was started by Euphoric Reality, and serves to keep immigration issues in the forefront of our minds as we’re going about our daily lives and continuing to fight the war on terror. If you are concerned with the trend of illegal immigration facing our country, join our Blogburst! Just send an email with your blog name and url to euphoricrealitynet at gmail dot com.

Every time I hear a news story about Christian parts of Lebanon being hit with Israeli bombs I fully understand that Israel is trying to do away with their enemy. Which of course is not the Christians, who are not Muslim Radicals like the members of Hezbollah. But because Hezbollah is running into Christian areas to launch their rockets, it puts Christians in danger.

To me it seems the news media has been trying to imply that Israel is attacking Christians or that Christians in the West should be against the IDF (Israeli Defense Forces) because of attacks in Christian parts of Lebanon. When we know Israel is attacking their enemy and I fully support Israel doing so. Given their enemy has always attacked them and groups like the United Nations have never been able to stop it.

Until now I had not seen a news outlet report the truth about the situation with Christians in Lebanon. And I am surprised that some truth is finally being told by of all papers…the New York Times. (I still feel the NYT is a traitor publication and people involved in publishing classified information should be charged.)

Why won’t media outlets speaking about bombings by IDF in Christians parts of Lebanon say more about this angle of the story?

How come we always hear about the affects of bombing in Lebanon, but I’ve never seen an extensive media report about the 3 Israeli soldiers killed by Hezbollah, before Israel decided to fight back and try to save the 2 kidnapped soldiers?

How come I live in the USA, but I see media reports that favor the same enemy that bombed barracks in Beirut in 1983 and killed US soldiers? (Syria and Iran were backing Hezbollah then and still do today.)

Reports like the one noted above are rare.

Hat tip Michael Savage.

update 7/31/2006 12:17PM: More at Tel-Chai Nation and Dhimmi Watch. And Dhimmi Watch noticed something I also saw myself when reading the article.

Note that the New Duranty Times provides no supporting evidence for its assertion that these Lebanese Christians are outraged by the Israeli strikes as much as they are by Hizballah — unless you count the statements by a Muslim they quote at the end of the article.

All the quotes from Christians are about how Hezbollah has put their lives in danger and how Hezbollah’s radicals are shooting them when they try to leave.

Dr. Michael Welner is not the only psychiatrist that found Andrea Yates to be sane when she murdered her 5 children. Remember Park Dietz? He also felt she was sane and his mistake about mentioning an episode of the TV show “Law & Order” resulted in Andrea Yates being taken off a life in prison sentence.

Park Dietz was a consultant for the show and made an honest error, that he did all he could to correct. Which is why Andrea Yates’ defense attorney’s request for a mistrial was denied back in 2005. But her defense was able to swindle the court of appeals and now we have a situation where a convicted murder has had their sentence overturned to “not guilty by reason of insanity”, because the defense was able to manipulate the courts.

Related post:

• Baby Killer Andrea Yates Gets Off on Insanity Defense
• Did Jury in Andrea Yates Case Get Half the Story? Psychiatrist Didn’t Believe Yates’ Story.

See the details in her post at her blog via this link.

I’ve mentioned the group Choose Black America in this past post, where I was focusing my attention on some nonsense said by former President Jimmy Carter. What I did not note and I’m glad La Shawn raised the issue, is that the group should not be using a racially exclusive name.

It is hypocritical to create an organization that is trying to fight the racial exclusion of Blacks, while having a name that is racially exclusive. Similar applies to the group formed to stop racial exclusion of Blacks in the Black hair care industry. That group is mentioned in a documentary I noted in this other prior post.

On another note, I saw a T-shirt yesterday that I’ve seen before years ago, but I never thought of how racist it is until more recently. The T-Shirt said:

The Blacker the college the sweeter the knowledge

Having attended a college that was once for “Blacks only”, I was fully desensitized to the racism embodied in such a statement when I was younger. Now that I’m older and saw that shirt again for the first time in many years, I realized if it said “The Whiter the college the sweeter the knowledge”, we would see mobs of Blacks having a White T-Shirt burning! It’s time to stop such racist statements and it’s time to stop using bigoted titles. I’m not saying that there is no such thing as Black culture. There are some things that are culturally Black and deserve the title. There are styles of music, food and other things that are distinctively Black by culture. But that does not mean the title “Black” should be used to promote “Black” as being a superior education or “Black” as a superior worker. That goes beyond the simpler facets of culture into preference of certain of humans over others on the basis of skin tone. Lets try to be Americans and embrace being part of a nation of laws that should be respected.

update 7/28/2006 12:10PM: LBC herself has chimed in to say:

Thanks for the trackback, D. but I didn’t say race-based titles are wrong per se. I just don’t like them, and I think they’re unnecessarily and unintentionally exclusive and divisive.

OK, then I feel they are wrong when used in the manner I mentioned . I don’t make much room in my own little world for gray areas .

People have been shocked by the actions of the nutcases of the Westboro Baptist Church of Topeka Kansas. And various legislative bodies have appropriately passed laws to try and stop them from spewing their garbage in the presence of grieving families, attending the funerals of fallen soldiers. The ACLU has found that this “church” of insanity is something they wanted to help out in court, to try and do away with some of the new laws.

Let’s face it, the nuts of the Westboro Baptist Church have the media’s attention and there is always some Liberal group willing to ride a media wave. So in comes the ACLU, to ride the wave most would never dare touch. Which shows they are by far the most despicable legal group in America.

Sean Hannity hosted a debate between Shirley Phelps-Roper’s ACLU attorney Anthony “Tony” Rothert and ACLJ attorney Jay Sekulow.
(The ACLJ is a group that often kicks the ACLU’s butt in court and stands for the rights of real churches, not cults.

The Phelps do not represent primitive Baptist churches at all, although they claim to follow those teachings. It is horrible that the Phelps even try to associate themselves with primitive Baptists. I love primitive Baptists and was even in worship at a primitive Baptist church this past Sunday.)

The ACLU attorney (Tony Rothert) said he disagrees with the Phelps’ actions, but does not find their acts to be “despicable”, when asked directly.

Hannity was really trying to figure out how anyone in their right mind would defend the Phelps clowns. And it resulted in this telling exchange.

Hannity: On a human level, why do you want to be a part of a case that brings suffering to military families?

ACLU Attorney Tony Rothert: I think the best way we can honor brave soldiers, especially the ones who’ve died is to honor the first amendment and not cheapen it.

The ACLU is so twisted, that they attempt to claim that defending the most disrespectful of nuts, that spew hatred at dead soldiers and their families is somehow a way to show those soldiers “honor”. Which proves you can’t be in your right mind and work for the ACLU.
(And for the record I think Republican and sometimes ACLU attorney Bob Barr is an idiot. I never liked him!)

At one point Rothert attempted to bring up an instance where the ACLU supposedly defended Sean Hannity, but Hannity quickly squashed that by mentioning how the ACLU stabbed him in the back.

Jay Sekulow focused on the fact people outside with bullhorns might be heard inside the funeral service and therefore cause a disruption.

This was a very interesting debate.

Hear it all using the audio links below. (2 parts)
Sean Hannity host ACLU - ACLJ debate part 1 - ASF Audio

Sean Hannity host ACLU - ACLJ debate part 2 - ASF Audio
(For the sake of bandwidth there will be no other formats made.)

Related post: ACLU Stands Behind The Westboro Baptist Church of Topeka Kansas

Dhimmitude being paid at a Catholic University. Just when you thought you’d seen it all! I’m not sure why the word “suspended” is being used, when he’s lost his position and benefits. It sounds like a form of firing under different a different term.

Professor Thomas Klocek stood up to some Israel hating Muslims outside of the class time at DePaul University. The Catholic professor’s reward from the Catholic university for his actions was a “suspension”. At the request of the anti-Israel groups, that had CAIR backing them up.

Of course if he trashed America or Israel he’d still have his job.

Hat tip Michael Savage.

We all know female child molesters often get lighter sentences than male child molesters. A common reason given by people who speak in defense of female molesters, is that female molesters don’t “continually prey on children”. As if female molesters go after one young boy for some sort of romantic relationship and never prey on other young boys. This is not true. The sick mentality that causes some men to abuse children also resides in some women. Which is why the gender of the molester should not matter. Put them all under the jail.

Here in Tennessee, a female teacher that was previously reprimanded and investigated has now been arrested for soliciting a young boy for sex.

If found guilty I recommend my usual life in prison with hard labor sentence.

It’s about time young boys molested by women receive equal protection under the law.