In the ever growing list of reasonable doubt, it appears the stripper accuser needed at least 6 photo line-ups to name the people she claims raped her.
Lawyers request photo lineup report
|
The attorneys claim they were given photocopies of documents they should have been provided originals of. They say the copies are not fully legible. Also they say they are missing some police notes that could contain other details. The attorneys also would like records from the medical center that saw the accuser.
This case is becoming like an episode of the old TV Show Matlock, where the defense identifies the real criminal. I feel the real criminal is a lying accuser and possibly even a power abusing District Attorney.
Related posts:
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Independent Conservative - Copyright 2008 - Copyright Notice
[powered by WordPress.]
31 queries. 0.430 seconds
June 12th, 2006 at 3:22 pm
When the stripper “eeny meeny miney moed” the boys out of a line up that guaranteed only Duke Lacrosse boys were chosen, to the DNA (or lack of), the boys’ alibis, the 2nd stripper changing her story to profit from this scandal, the cab driver, I didn’t think this case could get any weaker, but then evidence reveals that stripper lied to police about not having sex for a week, then later confessed to having sex with her boyfriend and two other men who drove her to the party, and using a “vibrator” in a performance prior to the Duke party.
And again when you think that this case couldn’t get anymore ridiculous, from Nifong’s own reports we find out that the police omitted important information including that the stripper claimed that the 2nd stripper, Kim Roberts Pittman, helped the boys rape her.
The stripper originally claimed that the second stripper helped with the rape!
Just when you think this case hit rock bottom, there’s about 50 feet of crap, then you find a sub-basement where in the corner Mike Nifong is clutching this case like “Gulum”, from the movie Lord of the Rings, clutches the “ring of power”.
If Mike Nifong doesn’t get disbarred after this, then there really is a corrupt system in Durham that protects rich white guys. In Nifong’s case - stupid rich white guys with transparent political agendas, but maybe I’m wrong. Maybe Nifong can turn a pig’s ear into a silk purse.
June 12th, 2006 at 4:19 pm
I don’t think Nifong gets cover because he’s a “rich white guy”. He gets cover from the system because he plays the emotions of people and they fall for it. Like Cynthia McKinney in her own district, Mike Nifong plays on matters like race for his own advantage. It’s not a skill exclusive to rich white guys. He’s playing people and they are falling for it.
If he’s not removed and gets re-elected it will be because the people in the area wanted it that way. And many of his voters are Blacks.
It is a system that protects stupidity when the majority of people in an area are stupid.