It seems the defense keeps finding more to support their side of things, with each new piece of information they get. Now from that stack of 1,300 papers, they have discovered that the stripper accuser mentioned no condoms were used. No condoms and no DNA is not very likely in a rape situation. (Especially with multiple people involved.) Also, it seems the examination that determined she was raped did not show some of the signs of a rape that would be expected.
Defense’s beefs with accuser’s story cited
|
Also slated incoming freshmen for the Duke lacrosse team are starting to look elsewhere.
The residual impact of this rape accusation continues to have a negative ripple effect. It’s not like this accuser is a rich woman and can be sued to somehow compensate those she has injured, with a rape accusation that I feel is a big lie. I don’t anticipate any “bombshells” from Durham District Attorney Mike Nifong, that would change my opinion.
Related post: Duke Lacrosse Rape Accuser Had Sex With 3 Men Near Time of Alleged Rape (Audio)
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Independent Conservative - Copyright 2008 - Copyright Notice
[powered by WordPress.]
45 queries. 0.552 seconds
May 28th, 2006 at 1:51 pm
Officer Notes Show Duke Lacrosse Rape Accuser Said She Was Not Raped. And There Were Multiple Lineups!
If all the other details were not enough to produce reasonable doubt, then the words of the accuser herself should be more than enough. I’ve already decided she’s lying given all the findings by the defense, so nothing shocks me at this …