It seems her “boyfriend” left some fresh genetic material in her.
Nifong could seek third indictment
|
If this is true, so much for all that talk of semen staying inside a woman for up to 6 days.
I’ve offered a theory regarding her true sexual relations. Maybe I’m right, maybe I’m only partially right. But the one piece of solid genetic evidence shows she was having sexual relations with somebody other than a Duke lacrosse player that night. This case is nothing but reasonable or total doubt at this point.
Here’s my theory on why she made this lie up. I think the strippers did have words with the players as they left and some of the players probably tossed out some racist statements. Stripper Kim Roberts called police about it. But I suspect the strippers felt that would not be much in the way of payback. Plus they were having an argument about payment. So the stripper accuser floated the “rape” accusation, hoping that would teach them a lesson. I’m not sure if she did it on her own or if Kim Roberts had any part in that plan, but I think that’s why she decided to make it up. She left the house without her money. They had an argument involving payment and the stripper accuser probably thought she would get back at the players by claiming there was a “rape”. At least that’s how I see it at this point, based on available information about the case.
If a stripper is stiffed on payment and does not have someone that can play the role of strong arm, what’s she going to do? It’s not the sort of thing that goes over well in small claims court 
. She left some money in their house and probably did not get paid what she expected. So, she cries rape and says they took her money. Makes more sense at this point than actually believing she was raped, based on the known evidence. She was given a photo line-up with nothing but team players in it, but she picked 2 people with “100% certainty” that appear to have tight alibis.
So in my opinion I once again feel the accuser made a false claim of rape and should be put in jail.
Related post: End the Duke Lacrosse Rape Case Now!
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Independent Conservative - Copyright 2008 - Copyright Notice
[powered by WordPress.]
31 queries. 0.288 seconds
May 18th, 2006 at 12:41 am
Yeah, The DNA from her boyfriend. Now we know where the vaginal and anal trauma came from.
District Attorney Mike Nifong is a disgrace to his job:
1) A responsible DA would have stated at the beginning that “there is an investigation, and we don’t have enough to make a statement right now. I’m responsible not only to the accuser, but to the accused. Please wait and let our investigators do their jobs”, but Mr. Mike “all-of-these-privileged-white-boys-are-rapists” Nifong at the beginning of the investigation he will prove the entire lacrosse team is guilty for aiding and abetting a gang rape inside a small enclosed bathroom. Nifong stirred up racial woes and put the lives of Duke and Durham at risk for gang threats and the racist groups like NAACP and the New Black Panthers. Nifong encouraged sexists groups to paste these boys pictures with hate slogans all over their school. Daily hate protests by women’s groups claiming these boys are rapists.
2) DA Mike Nifong cares nothing of guilt, innocence, or destroying innocent boys’ lives.
a. The first batch of DNA came back with conclusive for no match to any of the lacrosse boys.
b. The crime scene was completely void of any DNA evidence of any gang rape.
c. The boy’s that Nifong charged has an air-tight alibi and wasn’t at the party at the time the stripper claimed a rape occurred, and he refused to see this evidence before destroying his life.
d. The second batch of DNA came back with no conclusive match to any of the lacrosse boys.
e. DNA couldn’t rule out partial material found on top of a fake finger nail, inside a waste basket full of DNA material from the boys who lived in that house.
f. The third boy indicted went down to the police department for questioning without counsel, helped with the investigation by identifying all the other boys at the party, offered to take a lie detector test, willingly volunteered a DNA sample, and past a lie detector given by a top senior experienced FBI agent. The stripper said is 90% sure if he had his mustache, but he has never had a mustache, which makes it 0% sure. DA Mike Nifong refused to see this evidence and instead decided to destroy another innocent boy’s life.
g. The stripper’s body was completely void of any sign of a sexual assault (except for signs of recent vaginal and anal from her boyfriend). The alleged crime scene was completely devoid of DNA. It is impossible that a crime scene with three drunk men in a small enclosed room with a fighting and clawing woman being orally, virginally, and anally penetrated not leave any DNA evidence of urine, blood, vaginal fluid, sweat, fecal matter, scat smears, saliva, tears, or semen… especially if condoms were used. How would they take off the condoms during all this chaos without spilling, smearing, or touching the content inside or outside of the condom?
3) Investigator Mark Furman reviewed the lie detector test completed by the FBI on the 3rd boy unfairly indicted for a rape that never occurred. Mr. Furman stated that the boy not only passed the lie detector test, he passed with flying colors, but even without the test, this boy’s resume of helping the police with the investigation is impeccable.
4) DA Mike Nifong stated that all of these boys are hiding the truth and covering up for one anther. Nifong claims the boys are “stone walling”, but when the accusation was made, the police questioned the three boys who lived in the house for over six hours, not one asked for a lawyer. When the entire team was told they had to submit DNA samples, they didn’t call their parents or fight the warrant. The boys cooperated completely. These aren’t the actions of guilty boys. Only when their parents witnessed the circus-like atmosphere created by District Attorney Mike Nifong, the boys were advised to remain quiet.
5) DA Mike Nifong gave the second stripper a deal to change her story to support the false accusation of rape, and he wouldn’t revoke her probation from a previous conviction of embezzling $25,000 from her empolyer.
Mike Nifong got re elected by pandering to black voters more interested in convicting white boys than guilt or innocence.
May 18th, 2006 at 1:27 pm
More With This Duke Lacrosse Rape Accuser Just Does Not Add Up
It seems she does some pretty nasty crimes and gets off easy. Also, she seems to have a habit of being “passed out” when cops come around her.
Lawyers question dancer’s plea deal in ‘02
DURHAM — Defense lawyers …