Comments on: California’s Proposed Restrictions on Ultrasound Sales may Hurt the Pro-Life Movement More than Rich Actors http://www.independentconservative.com/2006/05/07/ca_ultrasound_ban/ The Independent Conservative saying what needs to be said! Mon, 08 Mar 2010 18:27:23 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9 hourly 1 By: Fire and Hammer http://www.independentconservative.com/2006/05/07/ca_ultrasound_ban/comment-page-1/#comment-1469 Fire and Hammer Tue, 09 May 2006 02:30:08 +0000 http://www.independentconservative.com/?p=637#comment-1469 <strong>Proposed California Ultrasound Law May Hurt Those It Claims to Protect</strong> When I first learned of the California bill, I wrote it off as simply a silly west coast response to something that was not a problem. Then I read a post on Independent Conservative which points out something troubling. Proposed California Ultrasound Law May Hurt Those It Claims to Protect

When I first learned of the California bill, I wrote it off as simply a silly west coast response to something that was not a problem. Then I read a post on Independent Conservative which points out something troubling.

]]> By: Matthew http://www.independentconservative.com/2006/05/07/ca_ultrasound_ban/comment-page-1/#comment-1457 Matthew Sun, 07 May 2006 04:56:42 +0000 http://www.independentconservative.com/?p=637#comment-1457 That's a good point. I know that one of the biggest deterrants to getting an abortion is seeing the baby's ultrasound. A woman simply cannot kill that life when she sees it for herself. I remember about a year ago that Planned Parenthood was actually pushing legislation in another state (not California) to ban ultrasounds -- under the same hypocritical premise of causing harm to the fetus. Of course, they see ultrasounds as bad for business; if a woman has an ultrasound she won't want an abortion and that's less money in their pockets. I sure hope the bill doesn't become law in California. That’s a good point. I know that one of the biggest deterrants to getting an abortion is seeing the baby’s ultrasound. A woman simply cannot kill that life when she sees it for herself.

I remember about a year ago that Planned Parenthood was actually pushing legislation in another state (not California) to ban ultrasounds — under the same hypocritical premise of causing harm to the fetus. Of course, they see ultrasounds as bad for business; if a woman has an ultrasound she won’t want an abortion and that’s less money in their pockets.

I sure hope the bill doesn’t become law in California.

]]>