Rekjalhew

May 7, 2006

California’s Proposed Restrictions on Ultrasound Sales may Hurt the Pro-Life Movement More than Rich Actors

by @ 12:10 am. Filed under Business, Evangelicals Under Attack, Questionable Items

Plenty of news is being made about Scientology nut Tom Cruise buying an ultrasound machine, using it himself on Katie Holmes and her later giving birth to a healthy baby girl. The state of California is now trying to ban anyone it has not licensed from being sold an ultrasound machine.

Calif. law would ban Cruise ultrasound copycats

The California Assembly has voted to restrict the use of ultrasound machines for personal use, approving a bill that would allow them to be sold only to licensed professionals.

Democratic Assemblyman Ted Lieu introduced the bill after ?Mission: Impossible III? star Tom Cruise bought an ultrasound machine to see images of his unborn child. The actor?s fiancee, Katie Holmes, gave birth to the couple?s daughter, Suri, last month in Los Angeles.

The bill prohibits a manufacturer or person from selling, leasing or distributing an ultrasound machine to any person other than a licensed practitioner.

Blog Fresh Tasty Ideas points out that this is oxymoronic. Given lawmakers are claiming they don’t want a baby in the womb to be unintentionally damaged, while they do all they can to allow people to kill their babies in the womb.

I am surprised that more people who are pro-life have not spoken up about this legislation. Given ultrasounds have been one of the greatest tools in the modern pro-life movement.

Bonding with baby – Why Ultrasound is turning women

Ebony Smith was once only a street corner away from getting an abortion. Last October, Ebony, 17, was walking to her local Planned Parenthood clinic in the South Bronx. “I was scared and I was just about to finish high school and I didn?t really know what to do,” she says, recalling how she was vomiting nearly every day and how she feared her parents? reaction to the pregnancy. “I thought that [abortion] was my only option.”

On her way to the clinic, she eyed a large billboard on the side of a building; it read, “Free Pregnancy Tests.” She decided to check it out and went inside Expectant Mother Care, a crisis pregnancy center. The tests confirmed that she was six weeks pregnant. A counselor told her about abortion?how a doctor vacuums the embryo or fetus out of the mother?s womb as you would a stray piece of popcorn on the carpet, and the guilt and bleeding that can ensue. That was one reason she decided not to abort.

The other was later seeing images of the fetus on the center?s 3-D ultrasound machine. The tiny black-and-white images amazed her.

“I didn?t realize that?s something inside of you,” she says excitedly. “That?s when I decided I was not going to have an abortion. I could see the hands and the feet, and I could hear the heartbeat. It sounded like horses galloping?da-dum-da-dum-da-dum,” she laughs.

Many pro-lifers are hoping that government will provide more money for ultrasound equipment, but if this equipment is allowed to be freely sold its cost will lower over time. Given if they are more freely marketed, the manufacturers will have the incentive to make them better and cheaper. If ultrasound equipment sales are more regulated by government, then the manufacturer will keep the price high, knowing they will sell less. Any regulation on the sale of ultrasound equipment will not hurt the Hollywood elite. Given they have the means to go literally anywhere to get what they want. It will hurt those who are already on tight budgets and are already accused of using unlicensed personnel.

Here is what the abortion advocates have to say about pregnancy crisis centers, that have been using ultrasounds to save babies.

Beware of Anti-abortion Crisis Pregnancy Centers


Nearly all of these centers are operated by churches or religious organizations. They refer to themselves as a “ministry” to save women’s souls.

Some of these centers offer ultrasound (also known as sonograms). But that does not mean the personnel operating the equipment are medically trained.

What the proposed legislation in California might more likely end up doing is keeping a pregnancy crisis center from helping to save lives. I have never heard of a pregnancy crisis center giving someone so many ultrasounds that it hurt or killed the baby. But we know the pro-abortion groups that slam pregnancy crisis centers are killing thousands of babies daily. It is ironic that they would want a safe ultrasound, when the abortions they support are proven killers.

Make no mistake, if this passes in CA the pro-abortion crowd will leverage it to try and pass similar legislation everywhere. In the process they may prevent some pregnancy crisis centers from helping mothers to see their child.

While the keepsake ultrasounds are not approved by the medical community, there is no proof it has killed a baby. And while efforts are being made to stop unlicensed ultrasound use to keep a baby from harm, a mother can still “choose” to kill her baby via abortion, or get drunk one day which might damage the baby. The lobby against mass ultrasound use is trying to play on extreme cases of a mother possibly using it daily to see their baby or possibly mishandling the equipment, when the high costs has prevented that from happening. If the equipment is continually mass marketed it will become cheaper and safer. It will also become easier to use. Once upon a time people had to see a doctor to get a pregnancy test. Now the test has become so cheap and safe that anyone can do it and do it safely on a daily basis.

Regarding ultrasound equipment, the market should be allowed to work freely without government restriction. Those restrictions will not hurt Tom Cruise one bit. But it will hurt centers designed to save lives. Pro lifers must step up now and be vocal against restrictions in ultrasound sales.


update 5/8/2006 11:33PM
Fire & Hammer has a link to a ministry helping pregnancy crisis centers purchase ultrasound machines. They accept donations if you are willing to help in their ministry.



2 Responses to “California’s Proposed Restrictions on Ultrasound Sales may Hurt the Pro-Life Movement More than Rich Actors”

  1. Matthew Says:

    That’s a good point. I know that one of the biggest deterrants to getting an abortion is seeing the baby’s ultrasound. A woman simply cannot kill that life when she sees it for herself.

    I remember about a year ago that Planned Parenthood was actually pushing legislation in another state (not California) to ban ultrasounds — under the same hypocritical premise of causing harm to the fetus. Of course, they see ultrasounds as bad for business; if a woman has an ultrasound she won’t want an abortion and that’s less money in their pockets.

    I sure hope the bill doesn’t become law in California.

  2. Fire and Hammer Says:

    Proposed California Ultrasound Law May Hurt Those It Claims to Protect

    When I first learned of the California bill, I wrote it off as simply a silly west coast response to something that was not a problem. Then I read a post on Independent Conservative which points out something troubling.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Independent Conservative - Copyright 2008 - Copyright Notice

[powered by WordPress.]

43 queries. 0.476 seconds