Rekjalhew

April 25, 2006

Booker T. Washington, Frederick Douglass, W.E.B. Du Bois and A. Philip Randolph on Immigration

by @ 12:13 am. Filed under Illegal Aliens

In the times of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington there was no illegal immigration problem as there is today. But for Blacks at that time there was a very noticeable immigration problem just the same. In the late 1800’s Blacks had to face losing jobs to immigrants from parts of Europe. Although those immigrants arrived to our shores legally, they were getting preference over native born Americans. Some of whom were much closer to being former slaves than Blacks of today that cry about slavery. Just the same, the Blacks of then faced an issue that some Blacks of today are facing. That they are being overlooked for low-wage jobs they used to be doing. Personally I feel Blacks of today have far more opportunities than Blacks of the past. To me it’s a disgrace that some Blacks of today try and associate themselves with a time that they never knew, when done for the sake of a handout. Even in the face of today’s immigration issues, Blacks have far more opportunities than any Black in times past. But for a moment, lets see what these figures of America’s history noticed, given we know Blacks are losing jobs to illegal aliens now.

I’ve found that several others have covered this from various angles. So I’ll just present some of their writings and I think they each speak well for themselves. It would be best to read each in full.

Here is a good commentary from the site U.S. Border Control. It mentions how Conservatives like Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington had a level of agreement with Liberals like W.E.B. Du Bois and A. Philip Randolph regarding immigration. They all agreed that open borders is not a good thing.

Fox comment not news - Frederick Douglass in 1853 described blacks being ?elbowed out? of employment by migrants


“The old avocations, by which colored men obtained a livelihood, are rapidly, unceasingly and inevitably passing into other hands,” Frederick Douglass, the black journalist and former slave, wrote in 1853. “Every hour sees the black man elbowed out of employment by some newly arrived emigrant, whose hunger and whose color are thought to give him a better title to the place; and so we believe it will continue to be until the last prop is leveled beneath us …”

As a new century dawned, black leaders as diverse as the conservative Booker T. Washington, the liberal W.E.B. Du Bois and the labor leader A. Philip Randolph called for curbing the open immigration of that period as long as able-bodied black workers were seeking work here at home.

Liberal professor Nicolaus Mills also realizes the similarities in his LA Times Op-Ed piece.

The black and brown job picture


“Our old employments by which we have been accustomed to gain a livelihood are gradually slipping from our hands: Every hour sees us elbowed out of some employment to make room for some newly arrived emigrant from the Emerald Isle, whose hunger and color entitle him to special favor,” Douglass wrote. “These white men are becoming house servants, cooks, stewards, waiters and flunkies.”

Douglass’ specific fear about newly arrived Irish workers is no longer applicable, but his worry that immigration poses a serious threat to the well-being of black Americans is.

I should note, that I don’t see Blacks as some group that is only capable of doing the lowest skilled jobs, but I do realize there are many Blacks that simply don’t have higher level skills yet. They need some opportunity of employment until they improve their skill set. While I’m against most social programs, I’m also against removing job opportunities that people should be leveraging instead of looking to social programs.

Shay at blog Booker Rising notes how Booker T. Washington was against open borders.

Old-School Black Positions On Immigration: Booker T. Washington

Many folks have slammed Mr. Washington’s Atlanta Compromise speech back in 1895 for accomodationism on civil rights (a critique of which I somewhat agree, by the way). However, what is lost is the conservative, capitalist Republican’s opposition in the very same speech to immigrants getting preferential treatment over native blacks, whose ancestors’ free labor built up America. Mr. Washington targeted business leaders for refusing to hire black Americans in favor of white ans Asian foreigners to fill jobs, and kick black folks off land. ”To those of you who look to the incoming of those of foreign birth,” he pleaded, “cast down your bucket where you are….[If you but do so] we shall stand by you with a devotion that no foreigner can approach, ready to interlace our industrial, commercial, civil and religious life with yours.”

You can read Booker T. Washington’s 1895 Atlanta Compromise Speech speech here. The speech was profound for it’s location and time. What those who criticize the speech don’t often understand, is that Blacks in Georgia had to be even more careful in speech than people like Frederick Douglass, who made his speeches in the North. Booker T. Washington was risking his life even making the speech that he made. A Black man addressing a White crowd and telling them what they should do in 1895 Georgia was not the norm. So he was “on the edge” to even make the address that he made. For it’s location and time, that speech was actual progress, not a regression.

So with all the Black Liberal and Conservatives that recognized the issues with immigration, I am amazed by today’s so-called Black leaders that go soft on illegal immigration. I personally am OK with legal immigration, but given some of the views of Black Conservatives from times past, they might look at me and say I’m Liberal on the issue. While today’s Blacks consider me to be pretty Conservative. Simply amazing!


update 4/28/2006 11:41AM
Shay at Booker Rising has found other similar information.



Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Independent Conservative - Copyright 2008 - Copyright Notice

[powered by WordPress.]

31 queries. 0.268 seconds