Rekjalhew

March 22, 2006

The Bush Administration Gives a Weak Appeal for Abdul Rahman

by @ 12:46 pm. Filed under Evangelicals Under Attack, Questionable Items

While saying something beats saying nothing at all, this response is pretty weak.

U.S. Backs Afghan Man Who Converted to Christianity


WASHINGTON — The Bush administration issued a subdued appeal Tuesday to Afghanistan to permit a Christian convert on trial for his life to practice his faith in the predominantly Muslim country.

The State Department, however, did not urge the U.S. ally in the war against terrorism to terminate the trial. Officials said the Bush administration did not want to interfere with Afghanistan’s sovereignty.

The Bush administration went to war four years ago, ousting the Taliban rulers in Afghanistan, and then joined with other countries to help steer the nation to constitutional rule. About 18,000 U.S. troops are on duty there, and more than 200 have died.

“Our government is a great supporter of freedom of religion,” Burns said. “As the Afghan constitution affords freedom of religion to all Afghan citizens, we hope very much that those rights, the right of freedom of religion, will be upheld in an Afghan court.”

When Ronald Reagan told the Soviet Union’s Gorbachev “Mr. Gorbachev, Tear Down This Wall!” that may have interfered with sovereignty, but it needed to be said. The Bush Administration needs to say something stronger!

There is one member of Congress who has some guts.


Rep. Tom Lantos, D-Calif., released a letter he said he had sent to Afghan President Hamid Karzai expressing dismay over the case.

“In a country where soldiers from all faiths, including Christianity, are dying in defense of your government, I find it outrageous that Mr. Rahman is being prosecuted and facing the death penalty for converting to Christianity, which he did 16 years ago before your government even existed,” Lantos wrote.

If a Liberal Democrat from California like Tom Lantos can speak up for the life of a Christian, then why are so-called “Christian Conservatives” in Congress so slow to speak? Congressman Lantos is a Jewish survivor of the Holocaust. So he knows a good bit about religious persecution. (Sadly he votes with Planned Parenthood 100% of the time.)

Michelle Malkin has video of Abdul Rahman expressing his belief in God, standing up for the New Testament and Jesus Christ. If our so-called Christian Conservative Congressmen in America are slow to stand for Christ and a persecuted Christian from the comfort of the USA, what would they do if they were in Abdul Rahman’s position?

VIDEO: “I AM NOT AN APOSTATE”


He was questioned, “Do you confess that you have apostacized from Islam?”

He responded, “No, I am not an apostate, I believe in God.”

Question: “Do you believe in the Koran?”

Response: “I believe in the Injil (New Testament) and love Jesus Christ.

The US State Department recently release a Human Rights report about Afghanistan. It mentions religious persecution, but mainly in the context of the Taliban still having power in some areas. The matter of conversion from Islam being illegal is mentioned later in the report.

Afghanistan - Country Reports on Human Rights Practices released March 8, 2006 (emphasis added)


Afghanistan’s human rights record remained poor due to weak central institutions, a deadly insurgency, and the country’s ongoing recovery from two decades of war. While the government struggled to expand its authority over provincial centers, a few areas remained under the control of regional commanders. There continued to be instances in which security and factional forces committed extrajudicial killings and torture. Extensive reporting of human rights abuses led to increased action against abusers. The following human rights problems were reported:

* extrajudicial killings
* torture
* poor prison conditions
* official impunity
* prolonged pretrial detention
* abuse of authority by regional commanders
* restrictions on freedoms of press, religion, movement, and association
* violence and societal discrimination against women and minorities
* trafficking in persons
* abuse of worker rights
* child labor

The law provides for freedom of speech and of the press; however, there were instances of governmental intimidation of journalists to influence their reporting. The law prohibits information that “could mean insult to the sacred religion of Islam and other religions.” The ambiguity over what was consideredoffensive material offered the potential for restricted press freedom.

On December 21, authorities released journalist Ali Mohaqiq Nasab from jail with a suspended six-month sentence. On October 1, police arrested Nasab and on October 22, convicted him for publishing un-Islamic materials, specifically for describing the harsh punishments imposed on individuals accused of adultery and theft, as well as the right of Muslims to convert to other religions (see section 2.c.).

c. Freedom of Religion

The law proclaims that Islam is the “religion of the state,” but provides non-Muslim citizens the freedom to perform their rituals within the limits determined by laws for public decency and peace, although there was harassment of foreign missionaries and others. The law also declares that no law can be contrary to the beliefs and provisions of Islam. The government required all citizens to profess a religious affiliation.

Public school curricula included religious subjects, and religious leaders conducted detailed religious study. Non-Muslims were not required to study Islam, and there was no restriction on parental religious teaching.

There were no known foreign missionaries or other non-Islamicreligiously oriented organizations in the country. Conversion from Islam is punishable by death.

Last last year the US State Department issued a detailed report about religious freedom in Afghanistan.

The licensing and registration of religious groups is not required. Proselytism was practiced but discreetly; there are no laws forbidding the practice even though it is viewed as contrary to the beliefs of Islam. During the period covered by this report, there were no reported incidents involving difficulties of individuals attempting to proselytize. Article 1 of the current, unreformed Penal Code (held over from previous regimes) states that the Code addresses only Tazir (less serious) crimes, and that the more serious categories of Qisas and Hudod crimes fall under Shari’a. Blasphemy and apostasy (converting from Islam to another religion) fall under the latter category, and are–in theory–punishable by death. The Constitution states that any existing laws will remain in place unless either deemed unconstitutional or revised. For the most part, the penal code has not been subjected to review.

So it is illegal to offend Islam (and other religions). Conversion from Islam is illegal. There are no foreign missionary organizations. And there has been harassment of missionaries. It is claimed that killing converts from Islam is part of that faith and no law can be created that goes against Islam. This is now what our troops are defending. And I must say, it’s not freedom. They may be better off than they once were physically, but the Constitution tries to keep Muslims in spiritual bondage.

Now what Presidential candidate running in 2008 is planning to stand against this? Our current President allowed it to be put into place with the protection of our troops. I don’t like seeing our troops putting their lives on the line to protect a nation that is against true freedom when it comes to faith.

Oh yea, but this is a “moderate” Muslim nation and they are our newly “liberated” “ally” in the war on terror :roll: .


update (3/22/2006 12:51PM ET):
Michelle Malkin is reporting that Bush is “deeply troubled”. It’s time for him to say Mr. Karzai, tear up that Constitution.



3 Responses to “The Bush Administration Gives a Weak Appeal for Abdul Rahman”

  1. The Political Pit Bull Says:

    Bush Mentions Rahman Case (Video)

    Click to Download (.wmv) Transcript: I’m troubled when I hear, deeply troubled when I hear, the fact that a person who has converted away from Islam may be held to account. That’s not the universal application of the values…

  2. BIG DOG'S WEBLOG Says:

    Muslims Do Not Tolerate Christians

    It looks like all the blood, sweat, and tears that went into freeing Afghanistan have no bearing on how the Afghanis act toward Christianity. An Afghan man, Abdur Rahman, is on trial for converting from Islam to Christianity and could face the death p…

  3. Tel-Chai Nation Says:

    Abdul Rahman must be freed!

    Still more on Abdul Rahman, on trial in Afghanistan for converting to Christianity. The Political Pitt Bull (via Michelle Malkin) has a video of Dubya finally giving a speech but unfortunately delivering it very weakly. Denmark is showing much better…

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Independent Conservative - Copyright 2008 - Copyright Notice

[powered by WordPress.]

31 queries. 0.352 seconds