Sure we all hope Bob Woodruff and his cameraman make a full recovery. But why is the story of a newsperson experiencing what troops have experienced so much MORE of a news story than when it happens to a soldier?
Some US troops question Woodruff coverage
|
The article mentions that maybe more people want to hear about Mr. Woodruff’s story because they’ve seen him on TV and feel they know him on a more personal level. No disrespect towards Bob, but I take more interest in the troops that volunteer to put their lives on the line, than the reporter that chooses to cover the story.
Popular radio talk shows speak to injured soldiers from time to time. And there is plenty of interest from listeners and people wish to send tokens of their support. So there is an interest in people other than newspeople being injured in war. But for some reason news directors think that America wants more of Bob’s experience than that of others. There are plenty of injured soldiers that support the effort and have no problem saying that they feel the effort is going well. But often when the MSM covers war casualties and wounded it is done with a spin that implies our troops are losing a war not worth fighting. How many more journalists do these terrorist need to kidnap for the news media to tell stories that show support for the troops and not themselves?
For the news stories that are seldom covered by the MSM, you can always check out Defend America.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Independent Conservative - Copyright 2008 - Copyright Notice
[powered by WordPress.]
32 queries. 0.493 seconds