Rekjalhew

January 4, 2006

More chemicals please, DDT included!

by @ 5:34 pm. Filed under Junk Science

Thanks to John Stossel being the head reporter on ABC New’s 20/20, that program has again been reporting facts, instead of the Liberal spin they used to put out a while back. This past week they featured a list of 10 media fed myths.

Of course the entire list is a great read, but there is one in particular I need to point out here. Because to me the most important myth is the one causing the most people to die. It was ranked #6 on the show. And its all about how Liberal crying about chemicals is literally causing people to die. Today chemicals like DDT can be used safely, but the cries of environmentalist Liberals are allowed by media to drown out any facts and voices of reason. Malaria is killing millions of people, while a simple solution goes ignored.

Excerpt of: MYTH #6 — Chemicals Are Killing Us


Health Minister Jim Muhwezi of Uganda points out that as many as 2 million to 3 million people may die because of DDT. But not because DDT is bad, but because Americans’ fear of it has deprived much of the world of the DDT that could have saved them.

How did this happen? Well, 50 years ago, Americans sprayed tons of DDT everywhere. Farmers used it to repel bugs, and health officials used it to fight mosquitoes that carry malaria. Nobody worried much about chemicals then.

Today DDT is rarely used. America’s demonization of it caused others to shun it. The U.S. government does spend your tax dollars fighting malaria in Africa, but it will not spend a penny on DDT.

The result has been a huge resurgence of malaria. More than 50 people million have died, mostly children.

“If it’s DDT, it must be awful. And that’s fine if you’re a rich, white environmentalist,” says Amir Attaran, a scientist leading a campaign urging the use of DDT to fight malaria. “It’s not so fine if you’re a poor black kid who’s about to lose his life to malaria.”

So we know that millions of people are dying, use of DDT could save them, we know how to use it safely, but still it is not used and people die. Did anyone ever stop to think that the millions that die could have worked to bring food to starving areas on that continent? That would be millions more people that could become soldiers in the African Union, to assist in efforts like the killings in the Sudan. And that’s just a couple potential benefits from actually helping millions of people to live.

This column by Hembree Brandon says exactly what should be said regarding this issue:

Brandon: Pandering to politics costs lives


One million to three million people dead annually, 200 million to 300 chronically ill from malaria, because governments won’t allow the use of the pesticide DDT to kill mosquitoes that carry the disease.

Although there was some questionable evidence that DDT, in large quantities, caused thinning of the shells of the eggs of some bird species (this is still being debated in the scientific community), there was not then — nor now — one scintilla of scientific proof that DDT had caused a single human death or a single human cancer.

As far as the Liberal Nuts go, Mr. Brandon mentions:


But DDT became a cause celèbre for environmental organizations, and their relentless campaigns have been a major influence in it being banned in the U.S. and many other countries.

They could afford to be holier-than-thou; malaria had been eliminated in the U.S. prior to DDT being outlawed. But for much of the rest of the world — especially Third World nations — the loss of DDT saw the number of malaria cases begin skyrocketing. And deaths.

And you have to wonder. Would so many African nations need other aid if they were simply given what they really need to survive? The same way Liberal policies in America keep many of America’s poor in a vice of contentment via government programs and allow the slaughter of millions of Americans in the womb via abortion. Those Liberal efforts are also causing the deaths of millions in the 3rd World. And all the while, they claim to be acting in the best interest of those most in need. When in reality, they are feeding lies and people die, that could have easily been saved.



3 Responses to “More chemicals please, DDT included!”

  1. Independent Conservative Says:

    AIDS Myths

    In my rant about our President’s State of the Union Address, there is one thing that I said nothing about. Because discussing it requires a totally separate post. Hence the reason for this post. Because our President and probably most of you …

  2. Independent Conservative Says:

    It Only Took Millions More Dead Africans, but Now More People Realize DDT Should be Used!

    I’ve made the case here for DDT to be used in the fight against malaria. It was A-OK to use in America and malaria was done away with here, but once it was needed mainly in just Africa, the environementalists suddenly put trees before man and c…

  3. Independent Conservative Says:

    World Health Organization Makes Official DDT Endorsement. Now Other Anti-DDT Regulations Must be Removed.

    Well they’ve finally come around and made it official.

    WHO Calls for More DDT Use Vs. Malaria

    The World Health Organization on Friday called on more developing countries, particularly in Africa, to begin spraying the controversial pestic…

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Independent Conservative - Copyright 2007 - Copyright Notice

[powered by WordPress.]

31 queries. 0.456 seconds