Rekjalhew

November 21, 2005

H RES 571 that was voted down is not much different from Congressman John Murtha’s H. J. RES. 73

by @ 3:29 pm. Filed under The Truth Shall Set you Free!

Democrats are saying that the vote to pull out was not “John Murtha’s bill”. But when you look at the text it is not very different.

Now that I’ve already covered how John Murtha calls for troops to leave whenever the fight is hard. It’s time to look at his latest rants and those of Democrats who claim that the bill the US House of Representatives voted on last Friday night, H RES 571 is not the same as the bill proposed by John Murtha H. J. RES. 73.

Here is the text of H RES 571:

Resolved, that it is the sense of the House of Representatives that the deployment of the United States Forces in Iraq be terminated immediately.

Simple enough, and that was voted down 403 to 3.

Here is what John Murtha proposed. I am putting the real “action words” in bold, because much of it is just B-S Democratic rhetoric!

To redeploy U.S. forces from Iraq. (Introduced in House)

HJ 73 IH

109th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. J. RES. 73

To redeploy U.S. forces from Iraq.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

November 17, 2005

Mr. MURTHA introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

JOINT RESOLUTION

To redeploy U.S. forces from Iraq.

Whereas Congress and the American people have not been shown clear, measurable progress toward establishment of stable and improving security in Iraq or of a stable and improving economy in Iraq, both of which are essential to `promote the emergence of a democratic government’;

Whereas additional stabilization in Iraq by U.S. military forces cannot be achieved without the deployment of hundreds of thousands of additional U.S. troops, which in turn cannot be achieved without a military draft;

Whereas more than $277 billion has been appropriated by the United States Congress to prosecute U.S. military action in Iraq and Afghanistan;

Whereas, as of the drafting of this resolution, 2,079 U.S. troops have been killed in Operation Iraqi Freedom;

Whereas U.S. forces have become the target of the insurgency;

Whereas, according to recent polls, over 80 percent of the Iraqi people want the U.S. forces out of Iraq;

Whereas polls also indicate that 45 percent of the Iraqi people feel that the attacks on U.S. forces are justified; and

Whereas, due to the foregoing, Congress finds it evident that continuing U.S. military action in Iraq is not in the best interests of the United States of America, the people of Iraq, or the Persian Gulf Region, which were cited in Public Law 107-243 as justification for undertaking such action: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That:

SECTION 1. The deployment of United States forces in Iraq, by direction of Congress, is hereby terminated and the forces involved are to be redeployed at the earliest practicable date.

SEC. 2. A quick-reaction U.S. force and an over-the-horizon presence of U.S. Marines shall be deployed in the region.

SEC. 3. The United States of America shall pursue security and stability in Iraq through diplomacy.

So his bill says “earliest practicable date” and what was voted down Friday gave a date, “immediately”! Given Murtha feels no more can be done, there could be no more practicable date than right now, using his logic! I don’t see much difference there. His bill called for a “quick-reaction U.S. force and an over-the-horizon presence of U.S. Marines”. So if the troops were pulled out there would still be troops “over-the-horizon” in other areas. A “quick-reaction” force could have been proposed in a follow-up bill, but let’s be honest here. A “quick-reaction” force would not be able to do much! So the call for such a force at this point is a bit of a waste and foolish! It would not prove effective! His bill mentions that more troops are needed, so how can he contradict himself in calling for a “quick-reaction” force, as if that would be effective?!!! So better to not have that. Still the bill they voted on Friday is not much different from Murtha’s bill, considering section 2 of his bill was a waste anyway! And section 3 of his bill “diplomacy” could continue if all the troops were pulled. So in total I see the bill that they voted on last Friday as a functional equivalent of John Murtha’s bill! But the Democrats for the most part ran from it, because they realized that they were being held to account for their rhetoric!

Murtha’s bill had 13 co-sponsors:

Rep Becerra, Xavier [CA-31] – 11/18/2005
Rep Capuano, Michael E. [MA-8] – 11/18/2005
Rep Doyle, Michael F. [PA-14] – 11/18/2005
Rep Holt, Rush D. [NJ-12] – 11/18/2005
Rep Jackson-Lee, Sheila [TX-18] – 11/18/2005
Rep Lee, Barbara [CA-9] – 11/18/2005
Rep Lofgren, Zoe [CA-16] – 11/18/2005
Rep McGovern, James P. [MA-3] – 11/18/2005
Rep McNulty, Michael R. [NY-21] – 11/18/2005
Rep Moran, James P. [VA-8] – 11/18/2005
Rep Rangel, Charles B. [NY-15] – 11/18/2005
Rep Solis, Hilda L. [CA-32] – 11/18/2005
Rep Weiner, Anthony D. [NY-9] – 11/18/2005

None of them voted for H RES 571!

This just proves that when it was time to put their votes where their big mouths were they shut up real quick!

Troops we love, support and want you to complete the mission! Ignore the nuts that talk smack. As you can see from the vote, they are just playing politics!



One Response to “H RES 571 that was voted down is not much different from Congressman John Murtha’s H. J. RES. 73”

  1. Independent Conservative Says:

    John Murtha’s sudden jump into the media spotlight might be a clever cover!

    Pennsylvania Democratic Congressman John Murtha has some “interesting” connections with companies he is granting government contracts to!

Independent Conservative - Copyright 2008 - Copyright Notice

[powered by WordPress.]

38 queries. 0.261 seconds