Here are some cases Samuel Alito was involved in that are Civil Rights related. They are cases that show he does protect Civil Rights as guaranteed by our Constitution. It is important for Conservatives to let the world know this man is a defender of Constitutionally guaranteed Civil Rights, not a defeater of them!
SCOTUSblog has this write-up about Samuel Alito, which includes a couple of noteworthy cases that he was involved in:
A majority opinion in Shore Regional High School Board of Education v. P.S., 381 F.3d 194 (3d Cir. 2004), holding that a school district did not provide a high school student with a free and appropriate public education, as required by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, when it failed to protect the student from bullying by fellow students who taunted the student based on his lack of athleticism and his perceived sexual orientation.
A majority opinion in Williams v. Price, 343 F.3d 223 (3d Cir. 2003), granting a writ of habeas corpus to an African-American state prisoner after state courts had refused to consider the testimony of a witness who stated that a juror had uttered derogatory remarks about African Americans during an encounter in the courthouse after the conclusion of the trial.
|
Protected a kid from being bullied and also helped a Black person on trial, when a juror was found to be a racist. I wonder if the Liberals will mention this when speaking about his work in regards to Civil Rights? I say good for him regarding his work on these cases!
Related post: Bush picks Samuel Alito for the US Supreme Court! Good job! No more swing vote!
update (10/31/2005 4:21PM ET): Here are some details from the case involving a Black man that was on trial:
During voir dire proceedings in the Williamses’ 1985 trial, the trial court asked two questions regarding racial bias:
Do you personally believe that blacks as a group are more likely to commit crimes of a violent nature involving firearms?
Can you listen to and judge the testimony of a black person in the same fashion as the testimony of a white person, giving each its deserved credibility?
All the jurors who were selected to serve answered “no” to the first question and “yes” to the second. The jury convicted both Williams and his brother and sentenced them to death.
…
In 1994, Ronald Williams, represented by new counsel, filed a state Post-Conviction Relief Act (“PCRA”) petition in which he contended that members of the jury had lied during voir dire when they answered the questions about racial prejudice. In support of this motion, Williams relied on a new affidavit by Montgomery and another affidavit by Jewel Hayes, who had testified at trial.
Montgomery’s affidavit stated:
[W]hen I was Juror No. 9 in the trial of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania vs. Ronald Williams and Raymond Williams . . . I was called “a nigger lover” and other derogatory names by other members of the jury. Remarks were made to me such as “I hope your daughter marries one of them” . . . . The jurors were given information by an alternate juror who was told by [the] Sheriff . . . that the “men were wanted in other states and if we don’t get them another state would” and “that Raymond [Williams, Appellant’s brother and co-defendant] was going to die anyway as he shot and crippled a man for life in Michigan. The man lived and was able and willing to testify against Raymond, so his black ass was cooked anyway.”
App. 6a.
Hayes’s affidavit averred:
Subsequent to the proceedings in this case . . . I ran into Juror Number Two (2) in the lobby of the Courthouse. . . . Upon seeing me he stated “All niggers do is cause trouble” I am not sure whether this was stated directly to me but it was stated for my benefit and loudly enough for me to hear and to get a rise out of me. During our confrontation he also stated “I should go back where I came from.”
App. 7a.
|
I’m all for killers getting the death penalty, but if the jurors harbor racial hatred as some of them in this case obviously did, they lied during voir dire proceedings and could not honestly be objective in their review of the case.
February 2nd, 2006 at 6:48 pm
Michael Anthony Taylor Deserves Worse Than an Injection!
So Samuel Alito took the more Liberal side of a death penalty case. Looking at a report of the case, I feel he got this one wrong.
Execution suspense builds, then wanes
…
Victim was 15
Taylor was convicted of killing 15-year-old Ann Ha…