<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Harriet Miers did not explicitly support Dallas sanctions against companies working with South Africa during apartheid!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.independentconservative.com/2005/10/20/miers_south_africa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.independentconservative.com/2005/10/20/miers_south_africa/</link>
	<description>The Independent Conservative saying what needs to be said!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 21:35:55 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Independent Conservative &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Harriet Miers, something does not jive!</title>
		<link>http://www.independentconservative.com/2005/10/20/miers_south_africa/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Independent Conservative &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Harriet Miers, something does not jive!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 04:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.independentconservative.com/?p=48#comment-59</guid>
		<description>[...] In a prior post I listed responses Harriet Miers gave to the Dallas Eagle Forum, while making a 1989 run for public office. After giving those responses it seems her view on some of the same issues changed in less than a year. I was reading over this Opinion Journal piece by James Taranto that listed her responses in a 1989 voting-rights case. Her responses do not jive with previous answers! For example, during the court case she mentioned: (A link to the court testimony document is available in the Opinion Journal write-up.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In a prior post I listed responses Harriet Miers gave to the Dallas Eagle Forum, while making a 1989 run for public office. After giving those responses it seems her view on some of the same issues changed in less than a year. I was reading over this Opinion Journal piece by James Taranto that listed her responses in a 1989 voting-rights case. Her responses do not jive with previous answers! For example, during the court case she mentioned: (A link to the court testimony document is available in the Opinion Journal write-up.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

