A study that seems to indicate that gays are doing a better job raising children really indicates the conclusion is faulty. But if you only read the headline you might be fooled into thinking man has found a better way to raise children than God’s recommended family unit. After all Jesus said:

Now during that exchange with the Pharisees Jesus was talking about matters of divorce. Even the Pharisees would not have been crazy enough to consider condoning homosexual activity. But just the same Jesus explains how it has been since the start of creation it’s self. That there were men and women and one man leaves his father (male) and mother (female) to marry a woman that he should stay with.

Only a man and woman have the “equipment” to join themselves and create children. Seems God’s way makes perfect sense.

Despite this teaching we know God gives everyone the choice to live as they wish. (Not saying a town has to condone every configuration as “legal”, but God allows every man to choose between good and evil.) He’ll judge everyone himself in the end. So a report on WebMD seems to suggest maybe God’s way is not the best way:

Well that leads you to think maybe it’s time for everybody to gay-up and do something they claim might offer advantages. But one must delve deeper into the report and you find find who they claim to be doing better than really might not be who you are thinking about. And it depends on what you call “normal” and “advantages”…

At this point you must be thinking (at least I was) “wait a second”!!! I thought this study would show how a gay couple could do a better job than a traditional family unit, with a father (male) and mother (female) in the home! This study is doing comparisons of one non-traditional configuration to another non-traditional configuration. To compare gays with single parents is like tying one arm behind the back of “normal” for a fight! This is an attempt to infer a conclusion using totally wacked out structures! Using everything but what God ordained!

OK, well given what they claim, let’s see what they find to be “normal” and “advantages”.

WHAT?!!!! This is what “normal” is? This is an “advantage”? It seems to me that the children are less inclined to understand the role of men and women, plus more accepting of “diversity” obviously includes feeling that relationships outside of God’s design are OK. Given the environment they grew up in.

Feel free to read the full article linked above for yourself. But this is a totally flawed study that leaves one wondering when did “normal” include boys wanting to play with girls’ toys and vice-versa ? Not my view of “normal” at all!

It’s enough to make you say beam me up Jesus, I’m ready when you are!